Author Topic: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman  (Read 14444 times)

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #25 on: July 16, 2010, 03:50:49 PM »
haha That's what I call brutally destroyed ;D



Yates had better calves but his feet are pointed out twice as much.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #26 on: July 16, 2010, 03:53:28 PM »

Yates had better calves but his feet are pointed out twice as much.
Lulz.
People either love or hate Dorian. Ive never seen an in between.  :-\

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #27 on: July 16, 2010, 03:56:54 PM »
Lulz.
People either love or hate Dorian. Ive never seen an in between.  :-\

A slight twist here and there can make you look inches bigger in photos. Too bad Dorian couldn't pull that off with his shitty biceps.


Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #28 on: July 16, 2010, 04:02:05 PM »
A slight twist here and there can make you look inches bigger in photos. Too bad Dorian couldn't pull that off with his shitty biceps.


Yeah, well the problem with your assumption here is that Dorians calves really ARE inches bigger than Ronnies.
Cmon man, youre seriously trying to defend Ronnies CALVES?
Ronnie fans are seriously some of the most blind people to his flaws...
Hell I dont think youll find a single one of the Dorian supporters trying to defend his biceps. They were acceptable for his frame at best in 93, other than that we ALL know theyre his weak point.  :-\

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #29 on: July 16, 2010, 04:10:05 PM »
Yeah, well the problem with your assumption here is that Dorians calves really ARE inches bigger than Ronnies.
Cmon man, youre seriously trying to defend Ronnies CALVES?
Ronnie fans are seriously some of the most blind people to his flaws...
Hell I dont think youll find a single one of the Dorian supporters trying to defend his biceps. They were acceptable for his frame at best in 93, other than that we ALL know theyre his weak point.  :-\

 Not the best calves, but I've seen plenty of stage pics were he holds his own in that department. And to argue your biceps point, Ronnie's calves were just as acceptable in winning 8 sandows.

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #30 on: July 17, 2010, 12:14:07 AM »
may be one of the worst threads/posts of the year.

yates wins easily - against any version of coleman.
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #31 on: July 17, 2010, 02:58:42 AM »
Not true since Coleman is about 40lb off his most dominant, and way off the crazy glutes conditioning he'd later develop, and still isn't being totally dwarfed by yates, although he is clearly losing.

The main thing I notice is Dorian's calves looking utterly insane!

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #32 on: July 17, 2010, 03:10:03 AM »
Do you people have eyes? Ronnie making dorian look like he hasnt benched in his life. Arms pawning, quads pawning. Even conditioning. LOL at your bias

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #33 on: July 17, 2010, 03:11:07 AM »
Somehow dorian makes up this with his calves and width. Oh boy

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #34 on: July 17, 2010, 05:31:07 AM »
dorian's calves are probably the best ever.

his arms? among the worst ever.

and his chest/quads are awful compared to a peak (no, not 1996) Ronnie:

much like the truce thread, this thread should have been over before it started:

Flower Boy Ran Away

French

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1879
  • Solana @ 2000$
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #35 on: July 17, 2010, 06:10:11 AM »
may be one of the worst threads/posts of the year.

yates wins easily - against any version of coleman.

too much density and conditionning for YATES. Ronny can't be ahead.
$

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #36 on: July 17, 2010, 08:42:46 AM »
think again:

not only is in contest ronnie far better, so is precontest too:

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #37 on: July 17, 2010, 08:44:06 AM »
LOL look at dorian's left arm in that lat spread.

even though its 93, the development is so poor it looks post tear, but it isn't LOL.

and the nuthuggers say dorian is ahead LMAO..
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83605
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #38 on: July 17, 2010, 10:34:51 AM »
lol at another fan-boy backfire thread , these Ronnie nutt-huggers love to contradict history.

lots of fan-boys getting bitch-slapped in this thread.  ;)

Dorian owns Ronnie for life

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #39 on: July 17, 2010, 11:43:41 AM »
Do you people have eyes? Ronnie making dorian look like he hasnt benched in his life. Arms pawning, quads pawning. Even conditioning. LOL at your bias
Hahahah. Even the diehard Ronnie fans arent trying to defend 96.
Ever think that maybe, just maybe, if the diehards arent defending him, than, JUST MAYBE, its YOU thats blind? Bwahahahah brutal self ownage.
"TRIX" (hahaha oh brother what a name) wont recover.

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #40 on: July 17, 2010, 01:02:14 PM »





Ain't nothing to it.

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49715
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #41 on: July 17, 2010, 02:08:05 PM »
In terms of size and separation, Ronnie definitely wins. However, Dorian has achieved a very dense and grainy look to his physique, which Ronnie did not have. Heck, most bodybuilders have not been able to achieve that look.

Interestingly enough, although ronnie is more separated and ripped than Dorian, he still looks soft compared to dorian.
X

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83605
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #42 on: July 17, 2010, 02:14:21 PM »


Ain't nothing to it.

hahahahahaha yeah nothing to it , Dorian has smaller joints , hips & waist compared to Ronnie in those ' comparisons ' as well as smaller calves , only in fantasy ' comparisons ' does Ronnie beat Dorian because in reality Dorian owned him for years  ;)

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #43 on: July 17, 2010, 02:16:43 PM »
lol at another fan-boy backfire thread , these Ronnie nutt-huggers love to contradict history.

lots of fan-boys getting bitch-slapped in this thread.  ;)

Dorian owns Ronnie for life

So true.

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #44 on: July 17, 2010, 02:57:15 PM »
96 ronnie was an infant compared to the physique he displayed in 1999:

THIS is destruction:

The main difference in 1999 is better lighting....

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Dorian Yates getting brutally destroyed by a 1996 ronnie coleman
« Reply #45 on: July 17, 2010, 03:02:40 PM »
LOL look at dorian's left arm in that lat spread.

even though its 93, the development is so poor it looks post tear, but it isn't LOL.

and the nuthuggers say dorian is ahead LMAO..

And the CURRENT MR. Olympia's biceps are even worse (Gay Gutler)...

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #46 on: July 17, 2010, 03:49:56 PM »
hahahahahaha yeah nothing to it , Dorian has smaller joints , hips & waist compared to Ronnie in those ' comparisons ' as well as smaller calves , only in fantasy ' comparisons ' does Ronnie beat Dorian because in reality Dorian owned him for years  ;)
dorian is also better because he has: more hair, white skin, black posing trunks, and better clipped toenails.

is their any other important points I missed on?


FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #47 on: July 17, 2010, 03:50:31 PM »
In terms of size and separation, Ronnie definitely wins. However, Dorian has achieved a very dense and grainy look to his physique, which Ronnie did not have. Heck, most bodybuilders have not been able to achieve that look.

Interestingly enough, although ronnie is more separated and ripped than Dorian, he still looks soft compared to dorian.

only softer in the back pose. legs and front are just as hard.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #48 on: July 17, 2010, 03:53:25 PM »
only softer in the back pose. legs and front are just as hard.
In general Ronnie tends to hold more water than Dorian, depending on the contest. Ronnies dryest was 98, Dorians IMO was 95, but his best showing was 93... 93 Dorian was still dryer and had better conditioning than 98 Ronnie.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83605
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian Yates destroyed by a 1996 Ronnie Coleman
« Reply #49 on: July 17, 2010, 04:13:51 PM »
dorian is also better because he has: more hair, white skin, black posing trunks, and better clipped toenails.

is their any other important points I missed on?



You missed a lot those comparisons are laughable and if that's what you're going by God help you.