« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11   Go Down

Author Topic: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??  (Read 30133 times)

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16160
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« on: July 18, 2010, 06:38:34 PM »
I got the impression that even at the 3rd tier shows you can find backs right up there with Colemans these days.

Logged

kevinf

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 971
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2010, 06:51:17 PM »
coleman was the g.o.a.t.
Logged

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2010, 06:52:17 PM »
in real life coleman was taller, so I say yes
Logged

~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2010, 07:00:26 PM »
right now hulkster is violently sifting through every picture of ronnie coleman in every last corner of the internet to show you how wrong you are
Logged

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2010, 07:04:36 PM »
you are comparing Ben White with Ronnie Coleman? lol

Hulkster will not be pleased
Logged

clued-up

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4374
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2010, 07:07:08 PM »


Quote from: Hulkster on July 18, 2010, 07:09:38 PM
oh, and that Dorian pic is morphed.

You are right.. here is the unaltered pic -

Logged

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2010, 07:09:11 PM »


this sets the bar pretty high
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2010, 07:09:38 PM »
Quote from: ~UN_$ung~ on July 18, 2010, 07:00:26 PM
right now hulkster is violently sifting through every picture of ronnie coleman in every last corner of the internet to show you how wrong you are

don't need to. Coleman is already destroying the two backs in the pics in the first post.

odd choice of pics to prove a point when the choice of pics disproves the very point you are trying to prove in the first place.

oh, and that Dorian pic is morphed.

Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

clued-up

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4374
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2010, 07:10:10 PM »
Logged

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2010, 07:12:22 PM »
r u weetahded ??

Logged

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2010, 07:12:48 PM »
dorian had the width and thickness to match ronnie, but the ronster had those crazy black people genetics with a superior BDB

Logged

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2010, 07:15:30 PM »
Quote from: tbombz on July 18, 2010, 07:12:22 PM
r u weetahded ??


I'm sofa king we todd did
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #12 on: July 18, 2010, 07:16:36 PM »
Quote from: james001 on July 18, 2010, 07:07:08 PM


You are right.. here is the unaltered pic -



I am always right. people should know that by now..
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16949
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #13 on: July 18, 2010, 07:18:18 PM »
Dorian: still best back ever
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #14 on: July 18, 2010, 07:19:39 PM »
you won't see this at a third tier show: 8)
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49697
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #15 on: July 18, 2010, 07:24:41 PM »
Colemans back PWNS White's back.
Logged
X

~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #16 on: July 18, 2010, 07:29:47 PM »
Quote from: SF1900 on July 18, 2010, 07:24:41 PM
Colemans back PWNS White's back.


yes, not even comparable

been has a good genetic shape to his back, and a good musculature

but ronnies back was SO developed, the muscles were SO deep and seperated you could hide change between the cuts in his back...........whites back is not even remotely as deep
Logged

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11680
  • Getbig!
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2010, 08:21:07 PM »
Quote from: SF1900 on July 18, 2010, 07:24:41 PM
Colemans back PWNS White's back.
Correct. Post a pic of Bens lat spread from this show and you will see.
Logged

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2010, 09:43:34 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 18, 2010, 07:19:39 PM
you won't see this at a third tier show: 8)
but you will see those calves at a 3rd tier show 8)
Logged

The_Hammer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4423
  • President Barack Obama -- 2 Term U.S. President
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2010, 10:00:43 PM »
The great back of all time.

Logged

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #20 on: July 18, 2010, 10:12:15 PM »
Quote from: The_Hammer on July 18, 2010, 10:00:43 PM
The great back of all time.


yes, period.
Logged

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49697
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #21 on: July 18, 2010, 10:18:15 PM »
Quote from: ~UN_$ung~ on July 18, 2010, 07:29:47 PM

yes, not even comparable

been has a good genetic shape to his back, and a good musculature

but ronnies back was SO developed, the muscles were SO deep and seperated you could hide change between the cuts in his back...........whites back is not even remotely as deep

This is what I was thinking but couldn't articulate. I don't know how to explain it, but the muscles in ronnies back look like they are indented. Like they are so deep and separated--like a damn road map. Ben Whites back is big and thick, but lacks that deep separation.

I don't know, I really can't explain it, but I think most people know what Im talking about.  :D
Logged
X

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49697
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #22 on: July 18, 2010, 10:23:56 PM »

Logged
X

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #23 on: July 18, 2010, 10:33:46 PM »
If Ben White improves, you maybe looking at a Ronnie-lite.
Logged

claymore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2916
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #24 on: July 19, 2010, 02:10:50 AM »
The three best backs of all time in no particular order (JMO):

1. Coleman
2. Yates
3. Stubbs


Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11   Go Up
« previous next »