Author Topic: Dorian said "Ronnie would probably win, I don't know"  (Read 136255 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #825 on: August 05, 2010, 02:00:20 PM »
you're the homo who didn't get the "Total Eclipse of the Heart" reference and then projected his thirst for Dorian Approved Protein Milkshakes onto me



I got the reference and it's still fucking queer  :-X




NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #826 on: August 05, 2010, 02:03:02 PM »
I got the reference and it's still fucking queer

Oooohh, but telling a man you drink his milkshake isn't? Go up to a random guy and tell him that. See what happens.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #827 on: August 05, 2010, 02:40:59 PM »
Oooohh, but telling a man you drink his milkshake isn't? Go up to a random guy and tell him that. See what happens.

I'm sure you've done that many times but I'll pass

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #828 on: August 05, 2010, 02:49:59 PM »
I'm sure you've done that many times but I'll pass

so you concede it's gay? Gotcha

in before ND contradicts himself by saying "I never conceded anything" yet won't tell a stranger "I drink your milkshake" b/c he knows it's gay

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #829 on: August 05, 2010, 02:59:50 PM »
so you concede it's gay? Gotcha

in before ND contradicts himself by saying "I never conceded anything" yet won't tell a stranger "I drink your milkshake" b/c he knows it's gay

No you still turned it into something gay , it wasn't the clip was about someone getting owned badly and that was you and then you switched it to " ND swallows my milkshake " now that's gay

you didn't get the reference and then I posted the clip you knew it wasn't about anything gay yet you continue change it for some reason you WANT it to be gay , more power to you  :-X

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #830 on: August 06, 2010, 12:32:22 AM »
no different than you posting the same B&W front lat spread over and over from the 95 pre-contest Kevin Horton shoot. Let's see how he looks in the other poses before we start proclaiming that's his best physique ever

if we're going to judge physiques based on 1 or 2 pre-contest pics, then Dennis James beats Dorian





nobody is hating on Dorian's pre-contest pics. The problem is when you argue Dorian had contest-ready conditioning with pre-contest size and fullness at 6 weeks out to create a super megazord version of Dorian that never existed. Either pick the smaller, more conditioned Dorian that stepped onstage or the bigger but less conditioned Dorian at 6 weeks pre-contest

Good point well made. James himself and his photographer said he was losing "pure muscle" leading up to the show, therefor these pics can be used to prove he's the best ever right?

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #831 on: August 06, 2010, 12:39:14 AM »
The difference being stupid.................. ............ there's only one from the 1995 photoshoot  :D I didn't start proclaiming it was his best physique ever Kevin Horton did and seeing he took the 1993 pics I have no reason to doubt him

Hehehehehehehehe Dennis James beats Dorian , funny guy  ;D

the difference in condition is negligible , he said himself he was in near enough contest shape in those pics , he said he had to lose a tad bit of water , even the less than 100% condition still kills Ronnies in this area it's not debatable

that version of Dorian YOU fear existed and we have plenty of pics to confirm it

Black and white stills "confirm" it, but the colour video is "of the poorest fucking quality , trying to ascertain an accurate representation of his conditioning based off of that is impossible"?

I don't like getting all accusative and calling people stupid but maybe time to take stock of what you're saying?

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #832 on: August 06, 2010, 12:55:24 AM »
No easy to prove wrong Dennis James has shit for balance & proportion , very high lats , long torso , short legs , calves are to high and to small for his quads, has never really been able to find the right balance between size & conditioning looks good in the most muscular and side chest he doesn't look good in many other poses , to many flaws

well it means something but it's not proof he's right , it's very interesting how Ronnie views Dorian , he has a lot of respect for him and obviously thinks that Dorian would beat him after all Dorian beat him for years and he's the one guy Ronnie thought was good enough , I love how people go on and on about how Dorian shouldn't even be mentioned in the same breathe as Ronnie and there is no debate and then just to have Ronnie crush their opinion by conceding Dorian would beat him is just such a blow to their fanboy rantings it's great  ;D Ronnie's opinion on the subject carries more weight than anyone on here that's for sure

A strong argument from whom?  ??? what's funny is anyone hates the precontest shots of Dorian but now love precontest shots of Ronnie , he's impressive , huge and in pretty good shape , still looks like shit compared to contests where he's totally dried out and hard as nails , it's pretty much established the heavier Ronnie became the worse his conditioning got , so the same thing applies he's bigger , not as hard as Dorian not as dry and he's still lagging behind in balance & proportion , I said this for years before I posted this quote anyone with half a brain can see for themselves

Wayne Demilla " I've said to Ronnie , " What you've got to realize is that in 98-99 you were probably in the best proportion you could be for your frame . Those muscles have gotten bigger. Just cos you're bigger , doesn't make you better . "

Haney wouldn't make the top 10? oh I beg to differ by virtue of being an 8 time Olympia he's most assured in the top 10 , would his physique wins contests today? probably not but times changed if Haney was born in 1980 you're damn right he's be winning today. anyway to get to your point obviously he was paying lip service to past champions the difference with Dorian is subsequent to this quote , he's said a couple of times Dorian would beat him , that's the difference and Haney & Arnold never faced Ronnie and beat him Dorian did


I think Dorian 1993/1995 Mr Olympia would beat any version of Ronnie! all of his strength are still there as well as his advantages on a tad smaller scale , I thing precontest is his best because his frame looks almost perfect , he's not oversized for it like Ronnie , I agree with Peter McGough when he said when Dorian dropped weight he lost some ' roundness ' in his physique. I think Dorian carried his size extremely well and looks better heavier

The color video is of the poorest fucking quality , trying to ascertain an accurate representation of his conditioning based off of that is impossible. Dorian and others have said he was in near-enough contest condition to win the Olympia that year , I believe Dorian said he could have lost a little more water and that's it. let's say his conditioning is 98% of what it was that year at the Olympia , it's certainly better than anything Ronnie has shown at a similar weight , case in point the 2000 Mr Olympia where Ronnie was 264lbs

Ronnie's conditioning does NOT improve with extra weight , Dorian could maintain his while carrying more size. and Dorian's conditioning is NOT his own advantage over Ronnie , he has a clear advantage in balance & proportion , and posing


I think the best physique Ronnie ever displayed was on stage and the best one Dorian displayed was off , Dorian's onstage still has advantages over Ronnie on-stage and off , I really don't have to concede that conditioning is equal but for the sake of argument lets say it is , it would ONLY be at his lightest , then he still has to contend with a Yates carrying more muscular bulk , having better balance & proportion and being a better poser

Dorian's didn't have ' one arm ' in 1995 he has one bicep shorter than the other , Ronnie had TWO missing calves his entire career even at his best contest showing. but for sake of argument we'll say 1993 is his better year just based on the tear. you can claim his chest & quads would look small next to Ronnie because parts don't win contests poses do , the judges scan & look at the calves in the side-chest just as much as they do pecs , same with the front double biceps pose , the assess EVERYTHING in EVERY pose , they look for who has more muscular bulk , who has more balanced development , who is denser , who is drier , who is more complete , who is hitting the pose correctly ALL AT THE SAME TIME all of the criteria is assessed at once , so while the judges might look at Ronnie in the ab-thigh and say " wow awesome taper , huge quads , great symmetry " , they will be comparing him to Dorian and they'll be saying " not as hard or as dry , not carrying as much dense muscle , calves dominated by oversized quads , midsection not that great , not as complete "

they look at everything and while Ronnie does have some clear advantages over Dorian when we start to tally them ALL up Dorian satisfies ALL of the criteria better

1993 Olympia Dorian might look small next to a heavier Ronnie but Ronnie would look soft and out of shape , incomplete and unbalanced , Ronnie's extra weight ( which isn't even pure dense muscle ) does NOT compensate for his deficiencies in just about ALL of the other criteria

It seems like you and all these other guys can't get it through your heads there is a very good reason 2003 is NOT his best showing ever , it pales in comparison to 2001 in terms if balance & proportion , in terms of density & dryness , he's light but looks huge because of the sharp conditioning , and his posing always sucked

Dorian 1993 Mr Olympia vs Ronnie 2001 in my opinion would be real close and this is the only version I think that would give Dorian a real run for his money and this would be real close but I think Dorian still has em if not by a lot than a little.





There is a lot of half-truth and hyperbole in your answer. You begin by CONTINUING at great length to cling to that stupid quote and pretend when Ronnie says "Arnold, Haney and Dorian" that he secretly means "Arnold, Haney but actually not Dorian". Who's presuming to speak for who? Ridiculous.

You pooh-pooh my Dennis James comparison because of what Kevin Horton said. In any one judging panel the judges often massively disagree, so this can only paint a 10th of the picture at best, assuming Kevin Horton is a judge.

Then you use some unsubstantiated generalisations like "ronnie looked worse bigger", "Dorian looked better bigger". Now I know many industry folk prefer Ronnie's 98 look, but my argument has always been Ronnie's big ugly insanely vascular 287 look is the most dominant he's brought to the stage. No he wasn't his absolute hardest, but he still ticked every box so many times they'd be forced to give him it over 257lb Dorian. Body parts may mean nothing but when every single thing is more developed and separated then the judges have little choice. Ronnie actually had big calves that year *this does not mean #1 best of all time*, and beat Dexter in the ab and thigh because, as Flex put it, he had 3 times more thigh.

"I believe Dorian said he could have lost a little more water and that's it. let's say his conditioning is 98% of what it was that year at the Olympia , it's certainly better than anything Ronnie has shown at a similar weight , case in point the 2000 Mr Olympia where Ronnie was 264lbs"

The water point was indeed exactly the point I was making. If you want to take the words "a little more" and equate them with "little enough so that he'd basically look his best ever on stage" then I can't stop you, but that's where the Dorian argument becomes speculative and the reality of the Ronnie argument begins to shine.

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #833 on: August 06, 2010, 01:04:52 AM »
Good post. I pretty much agree with this. Dorian '93 was his best in terms of proportions and balance. In '95, tears already had their impact but his conditionong was better. So you can only guess what the mix of the two could have been. I feel that Ronnie's best (O' 98 closely followed by the 2001 ASC) would have had both '93 and '95 Dorian beat. Pictures are just pictures, otherwise Vic Richards would be the greatest ever. But also you have to take into account what people who saw them in the flesh said. And at least, when it comes to conditioning, seems that pretty much everyone gives it to Dorian.

Cheers, well I mean I wasn't there, but I'd give conditioning alone to Dorian too. I think we should also remember Dorian was much bigger than many of his contemporaries, but 287lb Ronnie would make him look small whatever ND says. Dillet and Nasser had no backs so there was never a comparison there.

Good point about Vic Richards, there are many pictures and quotes to suggest he's the best ever, yet we know those studio photos tell us nothing of what he'd look like on a stage and conditioning from the back etc.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #834 on: August 06, 2010, 02:00:42 AM »
There is a lot of half-truth and hyperbole in your answer. You begin by CONTINUING at great length to cling to that stupid quote and pretend when Ronnie says "Arnold, Haney and Dorian" that he secretly means "Arnold, Haney but actually not Dorian". Who's presuming to speak for who? Ridiculous.

You pooh-pooh my Dennis James comparison because of what Kevin Horton said. In any one judging panel the judges often massively disagree, so this can only paint a 10th of the picture at best, assuming Kevin Horton is a judge.

Then you use some unsubstantiated generalisations like "ronnie looked worse bigger", "Dorian looked better bigger". Now I know many industry folk prefer Ronnie's 98 look, but my argument has always been Ronnie's big ugly insanely vascular 287 look is the most dominant he's brought to the stage. No he wasn't his absolute hardest, but he still ticked every box so many times they'd be forced to give him it over 257lb Dorian. Body parts may mean nothing but when every single thing is more developed and separated then the judges have little choice. Ronnie actually had big calves that year *this does not mean #1 best of all time*, and beat Dexter in the ab and thigh because, as Flex put it, he had 3 times more thigh.

"I believe Dorian said he could have lost a little more water and that's it. let's say his conditioning is 98% of what it was that year at the Olympia , it's certainly better than anything Ronnie has shown at a similar weight , case in point the 2000 Mr Olympia where Ronnie was 264lbs"

The water point was indeed exactly the point I was making. If you want to take the words "a little more" and equate them with "little enough so that he'd basically look his best ever on stage" then I can't stop you, but that's where the Dorian argument becomes speculative and the reality of the Ronnie argument begins to shine.

Quote
There is a lot of half-truth and hyperbole in your answer. You begin by CONTINUING at great length to cling to that stupid quote and pretend when Ronnie says "Arnold, Haney and Dorian" that he secretly means "Arnold, Haney but actually not Dorian". Who's presuming to speak for who? Ridiculous.

I could care less about that quote it's the subsequent two that pretty much render that one useless. and we know that Ronnie meant Arnold & Haney but not Dorian because he said twice after that he wouldn't beat Dorian , so I'm not speaking for him only repeating what he said. and again Dorian beat Ronnie for years the other two never did

Quote
You pooh-pooh my Dennis James comparison because of what Kevin Horton said. In any one judging panel the judges often massively disagree, so this can only paint a 10th of the picture at best, assuming Kevin Horton is a judge.

no not because of what Kevin Horton said it's because of what Dorian said , Dennis James is NO Dorian Yates the main difference is when Dorian dropped size he still fucking destroyed everyone , Horton is NOT a judge but Yates is. And judges often massively disagree? says who? no quite the opposite judges often agree who the winner is if they didn't how would a contest ever get judged if there was such a discrepancy? judges are hand-picked for their consistency

Quote
Then you use some unsubstantiated generalisations like "ronnie looked worse bigger", "Dorian looked better bigger". Now I know many industry folk prefer Ronnie's 98 look, but my argument has always been Ronnie's big ugly insanely vascular 287 look is the most dominant he's brought to the stage. No he wasn't his absolute hardest, but he still ticked every box so many times they'd be forced to give him it over 257lb Dorian. Body parts may mean nothing but when every single thing is more developed and separated then the judges have little choice. Ronnie actually had big calves that year *this does not mean #1 best of all time*, and beat Dexter in the ab and thigh because, as Flex put it, he had 3 times more thigh.

You bitch about Horton not being a judge and then try and use Flex as one  ::) and how is my claim ' unsubstantiated? how? Ronnie himself said it , as well as dozens of other people , compared to his lightest he looks worse bigger and here is the part where it become substantiated , his density & dryness are worse , his balance & proportion are worse this is proof he looks worse heavier you compare any pics of the two from 2001/2003 it's painfully obvious to anyone who knows what to look for that he's clearly better lighter

03 his most dominate? I could argue 2001ASC is but that's a matter of semantics because exactly who did he dominate over? NOT Dorian Yates and you keep insisting on cherry picking the criteria and mistakenly thinking more unconditioned size trumps all the other criteria and it doesn't , that's not how it works.

Ronnie had big calves that year? AND? they still lacked diamond shape , proportion in relation to his quads and development , stop mistaken size for quality , and another thing to keep doing is well Ronnie beat Dex and he's lighter more conditioned so he would therefore beat Dorian , Dorian is NOT Dexter Jackson , Ronnie may have a easy time with the ho-hum competition he faced , he never faced anyone in Dorian's league

Quote
The water point was indeed exactly the point I was making. If you want to take the words "a little more" and equate them with "little enough so that he'd basically look his best ever on stage" then I can't stop you, but that's where the Dorian argument becomes speculative and the reality of the Ronnie argument begins to shine.

The Ronnie argument shines? what argument? he down in density & dryness and balance & proportion but he's ' huge ' so he'll win? he beat Dexter so he'll win? really shines boy  ::)

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #835 on: August 06, 2010, 09:32:30 AM »
Wow ....I did this nonsense for a week, and I was tired of going around in circles over the same dumb shit. Its beyond pointless. 

You must have a screw loose to keep doing this for years. Isn't that the definition of insanity. ...keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. ??

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #836 on: August 06, 2010, 09:48:36 AM »
Wow ....I did this nonsense for a week, and I was tired of going around in circles over the same dumb shit. Its beyond pointless. 

You must have a screw loose to keep doing this for years. Isn't that the definition of insanity. ...keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. ??

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #837 on: August 06, 2010, 02:28:22 PM »
 

You must have a screw loose to keep doing this for years. Isn't that the definition of insanity. ...keep doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. ??


Key post
choice is an illusion

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #838 on: August 06, 2010, 02:39:25 PM »
You're all complicit , you're all part of the problem.  ;D

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Could Dorian beat this?
« Reply #839 on: August 07, 2010, 02:53:31 AM »
Ronnie > Dorian  ;D

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
I could care less about that quote it's the subsequent two that pretty much render that one useless. and we know that Ronnie meant Arnold & Haney but not Dorian because he said twice after that he wouldn't beat Dorian , so I'm not speaking for him only repeating what he said. and again Dorian beat Ronnie for years the other two never did

no not because of what Kevin Horton said it's because of what Dorian said , Dennis James is NO Dorian Yates the main difference is when Dorian dropped size he still fucking destroyed everyone , Horton is NOT a judge but Yates is. And judges often massively disagree? says who? no quite the opposite judges often agree who the winner is if they didn't how would a contest ever get judged if there was such a discrepancy? judges are hand-picked for their consistency

You bitch about Horton not being a judge and then try and use Flex as one  ::) and how is my claim ' unsubstantiated? how? Ronnie himself said it , as well as dozens of other people , compared to his lightest he looks worse bigger and here is the part where it become substantiated , his density & dryness are worse , his balance & proportion are worse this is proof he looks worse heavier you compare any pics of the two from 2001/2003 it's painfully obvious to anyone who knows what to look for that he's clearly better lighter

03 his most dominate? I could argue 2001ASC is but that's a matter of semantics because exactly who did he dominate over? NOT Dorian Yates and you keep insisting on cherry picking the criteria and mistakenly thinking more unconditioned size trumps all the other criteria and it doesn't , that's not how it works.

Ronnie had big calves that year? AND? they still lacked diamond shape , proportion in relation to his quads and development , stop mistaken size for quality , and another thing to keep doing is well Ronnie beat Dex and he's lighter more conditioned so he would therefore beat Dorian , Dorian is NOT Dexter Jackson , Ronnie may have a easy time with the ho-hum competition he faced , he never faced anyone in Dorian's league

The Ronnie argument shines? what argument? he down in density & dryness and balance & proportion but he's ' huge ' so he'll win? he beat Dexter so he'll win? really shines boy  ::)

When Flex wrote that Ronnie won the ab and thigh because he has 3 times more thigh than Dexter they were simply backing up what the judges decreed. So I wasn't using Flex as a judge I was using the judges as a judge. You are using Dorian as a judge of himself ::) The guy knows his onions but then he said "Ronnie would probably win, I don't know", so he clearly thinks it'd be close. He must realise thighs are important in the ab and thigh and that Ronnie's 2003/2004 thighs were quite insane next to Dorian's of 93.

You keep calling 2003 R0nnie "unconditioned". Whilst I'll happily concede it's not Dorian level he's pretty dialled in.

In 2002 one judge had Ernie Taylor in 5th, another in 14th. He had himself 5th, as did the guy photographing him a couple of weeks before the show. Oldest scenario in bodybuilding that everything looks better a few weeks before the show, that what's so hard about competing!







If you watch the Ronnie one first Dorian almost has a Labrada-esque look of smallness when you watch the 93 vid.




NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
When Flex wrote that Ronnie won the ab and thigh because he has 3 times more thigh than Dexter they were simply backing up what the judges decreed. So I wasn't using Flex as a judge I was using the judges as a judge. You are using Dorian as a judge of himself ::) The guy knows his onions but then he said "Ronnie would probably win, I don't know", so he clearly thinks it'd be close. He must realise thighs are important in the ab and thigh and that Ronnie's 2003/2004 thighs were quite insane next to Dorian's of 93.

You keep calling 2003 R0nnie "unconditioned". Whilst I'll happily concede it's not Dorian level he's pretty dialled in.

In 2002 one judge had Ernie Taylor in 5th, another in 14th. He had himself 5th, as did the guy photographing him a couple of weeks before the show. Oldest scenario in bodybuilding that everything looks better a few weeks before the show, that what's so hard about competing!




If you watch the Ronnie one first Dorian almost has a Labrada-esque look of smallness when you watch the 93 vid.




Quote
When Flex wrote that Ronnie won the ab and thigh because he has 3 times more thigh than Dexter they were simply backing up what the judges decreed. So I wasn't using Flex as a judge I was using the judges as a judge. You are using Dorian as a judge of himself ::) The guy knows his onions but then he said "Ronnie would probably win, I don't know", so he clearly thinks it'd be close. He must realise thighs are important in the ab and thigh and that Ronnie's 2003/2004 thighs were quite insane next to Dorian's of 93.

No he wasn't backing up the judges decree , the judges decree isn't to have the biggest parts while neglecting proportion & balance so he's wrong and your interpretation on what he was ' backing up ' is wrong and NO you weren't using the judges as a judge you haven't and still only harp on one part of the criteria as an advantage over the rest ( muscular size )  and yes I'm using Dorian as a judge and he does know his opinions especially when he said outright he is better conditioned than Ronnie and has better balance , he also said it was a very hard question for him to answer he said a lot but you see what you liked

NOT one thing is more important in a pose than everything , the judges look for balance throughout the entire physique , proportion , they look for quads CALVES how well they compliment each other , they look for abs , serattus , intercostals , obliques , pecs , lats , they look for who is carrying more muscular bulk , if that muscular bulk is dense hard muscle , who is the driest they look at EVERYTHING at once and determine who meets it better , this is how it works commit this to memory and stop harping on the importance of bigger parts

Quote
You keep calling 2003 R0nnie "unconditioned". Whilst I'll happily concede it's not Dorian level he's pretty dialled in.
I didn't say ' unconditioned ' I said his conditioning pales in comparison to Dorian and it sucks even compared to 1998/2001 that pic proves my point

Quote
In 2002 one judge had Ernie Taylor in 5th, another in 14th. He had himself 5th, as did the guy photographing him a couple of weeks before the show. Oldest scenario in bodybuilding that everything looks better a few weeks before the show, that what's so hard about competing!

This proves what? judges are inconsistent ? just to let you know both the high & low scores are tossed out so a guy could lose poses and still finish with straight firsts this doesn't prove judges are inconsistent , and you keep trying to work in other examples and apply them to Dorian , Dorian isn't Ernie , Dennis James , or Kamali , the difference is while all these guys look ' good ' six weeks out NONE of the tied it all together the day of the show , Dorian did , he looked outstanding precontest 1993 and he looked just as outstanding the day of the contest albeit lighter

Quote
If you watch the Ronnie one first Dorian almost has a Labrada-esque look of smallness when you watch the 93 vid.

LMFAO Labraesque look , oh boy ...these guys create these fantasy comparisons where Ronnie is like Paul Bunyan where Dorian's hips & waist and joints are all smaller than Ronnie ( which would never be the case ) where Ronnie's calves are bigger than Dorian ( which would never be the case ) and believe them like mindless children , you stand Dorian 1993 next to Ronnie 2003 side-by-side a lot of fan-boys would be disappointed that Ronnie isn't making him look like a featherweight

Ronnie 2003 would be noticeably bigger but NOT fantasy big like you guys wish where Dorian looks like Labrada next to him LMFAO lots of things would be obvious , like Ronnie 2003 pales in comparison in density & dryness and balance & proportion and despite being down on ' size ' he would beat Ronnie 03 the same way Shawn Ray beat a 285 pound Nasser , better conditioning , better posing , and better overall package


Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
No he wasn't backing up the judges decree , the judges decree isn't to have the biggest parts while neglecting proportion & balance so he's wrong and your interpretation on what he was ' backing up ' is wrong and NO you weren't using the judges as a judge you haven't and still only harp on one part of the criteria as an advantage over the rest ( muscular size )  and yes I'm using Dorian as a judge and he does know his opinions especially when he said outright he is better conditioned than Ronnie and has better balance , he also said it was a very hard question for him to answer he said a lot but you see what you liked

NOT one thing is more important in a pose than everything , the judges look for balance throughout the entire physique , proportion , they look for quads CALVES how well they compliment each other , they look for abs , serattus , intercostals , obliques , pecs , lats , they look for who is carrying more muscular bulk , if that muscular bulk is dense hard muscle , who is the driest they look at EVERYTHING at once and determine who meets it better , this is how it works commit this to memory and stop harping on the importance of bigger parts
I didn't say ' unconditioned ' I said his conditioning pales in comparison to Dorian and it sucks even compared to 1998/2001 that pic proves my point

This proves what? judges are inconsistent ? just to let you know both the high & low scores are tossed out so a guy could lose poses and still finish with straight firsts this doesn't prove judges are inconsistent , and you keep trying to work in other examples and apply them to Dorian , Dorian isn't Ernie , Dennis James , or Kamali , the difference is while all these guys look ' good ' six weeks out NONE of the tied it all together the day of the show , Dorian did , he looked outstanding precontest 1993 and he looked just as outstanding the day of the contest albeit lighter

LMFAO Labraesque look , oh boy ...these guys create these fantasy comparisons where Ronnie is like Paul Bunyan where Dorian's hips & waist and joints are all smaller than Ronnie ( which would never be the case ) where Ronnie's calves are bigger than Dorian ( which would never be the case ) and believe them like mindless children , you stand Dorian 1993 next to Ronnie 2003 side-by-side a lot of fan-boys would be disappointed that Ronnie isn't making him look like a featherweight

Ronnie 2003 would be noticeably bigger but NOT fantasy big like you guys wish where Dorian looks like Labrada next to him LMFAO lots of things would be obvious , like Ronnie 2003 pales in comparison in density & dryness and balance & proportion and despite being down on ' size ' he would beat Ronnie 03 the same way Shawn Ray beat a 285 pound Nasser , better conditioning , better posing , and better overall package



I don't get your first paragraph, you know in the challenge round 2004 Ronnie actually beat Dexter in the ab and thigh? So all your judges waffle is superfluous cos Dexter destroys Ronnie on intercostals etc but it didn't mean dick. I know what Dorian said, I know it was hard question to answer etc, you say I'm picking the bits that suit my argument yet omit the part where he says Ronnie would probably win? Bwaha

You said I "keep insisting on cherry picking the criteria and mistakenly thinking more unconditioned size trumps all the other criteria and it doesn't , that's not how it works." So I said Ronnie's not unconditioned. Then you replied just now "I didn't say ' unconditioned". I can't keep up.

Earlier you said judges often massively disagree? says who? no quite the opposite judges often agree who the winner is if they didn't how would a contest ever get judged if there was such a discrepancy? judges are hand-picked for their consistency , so I gave an example where judges did disagree. Then you got very irritated.

Shawn Ray beating Nasser no-back was great. Had Nasser had possibly the best back of all time like Ronnie you might have a point. Sorry this is not the case.

Never said Ronnie had better calves or any of that rubbish, maybe you are arguing with somebody else.

The Labrada comparison was an exaggeration but it got under your skin didn't it cos although he dwarfs Labrada really he's still that much smaller than Ronnie's now not-unconditioned 2003 incarnation.


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
The Labrada comparison was an exaggeration but it got under your skin didn't it cos although he dwarfs Labrada really he's still that much smaller than Ronnie's now not-unconditioned 2003 incarnation.

the judges at the Mr. Olympia set a precedent that favors size. Thus 03 Ronnie (287 lbs) would beat 93 Dorian (257 lbs) for the same reason Lee Haney beat the smaller, more conditioned, more balanced Gaspari

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Ronnie's advantage in size > Dorian's advantage in conditioning

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
the judges at the Mr. Olympia set a precedent that favors size. Thus 03 Ronnie (287 lbs) would beat 93 Dorian (257 lbs) for the same reason Lee Haney beat the smaller, more conditioned, more balanced Gaspari

yeah apparently they forgot in 2008 and in 2006  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Ronnie's advantage in size > Dorian's advantage in conditioning

spoken exactly like someone who doesn't know how contests are judged  ;D you forgot his advantage in balance & proportion and posing & presentation as well

wow he's bigger so he must be bigger textbook fanboy logic

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
yeah apparently they forgot in 2008 and in 2006  ;)

lol, poor ND

how long was Lee Haney's reign? How long was Dorian's reign? How long was Ronnie's reign?

you think pointing out 2 yrs in the last 25 changes what I said? lmao

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
spoken exactly like someone who doesn't know how contests are judged you forgot his advantage in balance & proportion and posing & presentation as well

spoken like a novice who doesn't know how bodybuilding contests are judged. You forgot about Ronnie's advantage in muscular bulk, size, mass, weight, shape, fullness, geometry, definition, detail, separations, striations, and charisma

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83384
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
I don't get your first paragraph, you know in the challenge round 2004 Ronnie actually beat Dexter in the ab and thigh? So all your judges waffle is superfluous cos Dexter destroys Ronnie on intercostals etc but it didn't mean dick. I know what Dorian said, I know it was hard question to answer etc, you say I'm picking the bits that suit my argument yet omit the part where he says Ronnie would probably win? Bwaha

You said I "keep insisting on cherry picking the criteria and mistakenly thinking more unconditioned size trumps all the other criteria and it doesn't , that's not how it works." So I said Ronnie's not unconditioned. Then you replied just now "I didn't say ' unconditioned". I can't keep up.

Earlier you said judges often massively disagree? says who? no quite the opposite judges often agree who the winner is if they didn't how would a contest ever get judged if there was such a discrepancy? judges are hand-picked for their consistency , so I gave an example where judges did disagree. Then you got very irritated.

Shawn Ray beating Nasser no-back was great. Had Nasser had possibly the best back of all time like Ronnie you might have a point. Sorry this is not the case.

Never said Ronnie had better calves or any of that rubbish, maybe you are arguing with somebody else.

The Labrada comparison was an exaggeration but it got under your skin didn't it cos although he dwarfs Labrada really he's still that much smaller than Ronnie's now not-unconditioned 2003 incarnation.



Quote
I don't get your first paragraph, you know in the challenge round 2004 Ronnie actually beat Dexter in the ab and thigh? So all your judges waffle is superfluous cos Dexter destroys Ronnie on intercostals etc but it didn't mean dick. I know what Dorian said, I know it was hard question to answer etc, you say I'm picking the bits that suit my argument yet omit the part where he says Ronnie would probably win? Bwaha

there's a lot you don't get. Ronnie beat Dexter in the ab-thigh for multiple reasons you're attempting to connect the dots claiming if Ronnie beat Dex a smaller more conditioned guy he would beat Yates , not how it works. keep cherry picking it hasn't worked for you yet and it's not how contests work at all.

Quote
You said I "keep insisting on cherry picking the criteria and mistakenly thinking more unconditioned size trumps all the other criteria and it doesn't , that's not how it works." So I said Ronnie's not unconditioned. Then you replied just now "I didn't say ' unconditioned". I can't keep up.

you get lost easily , don't put words in quotations as if it's my statement, it's all semantics there is NO debate on who is better conditioned of the two or even between Ronnie compared to himself when he was lighter

Quote
Earlier you said judges often massively disagree? says who? no quite the opposite judges often agree who the winner is if they didn't how would a contest ever get judged if there was such a discrepancy? judges are hand-picked for their consistency , so I gave an example where judges did disagree. Then you got very irritated.

you gave me an example which wasn't accurate or even correct they often massively disagree that's a generalized statement and your ' proof ' was on example which didn't even take into account the drop the high & low scores

Quote
Shawn Ray beating Nasser no-back was great. Had Nasser had possibly the best back of all time like Ronnie you might have a point. Sorry this is not the case.

oh boy I knew you would harp on the back when ignoring the fact that he was heavier and softer and wasn't as good of a poser , a better back wouldn't have saved Nasser when he's lacking much more

Quote
Never said Ronnie had better calves or any of that rubbish, maybe you are arguing with somebody else.

I don't believe I said you claimed that

Quote
The Labrada comparison was an exaggeration but it got under your skin didn't it cos although he dwarfs Labrada really he's still that much smaller than Ronnie's now not-unconditioned 2003 incarnation.


It didn't get under my skin it's just foolish , just like when Hulkster claimed Ronnie had more detailed calves it's so far out of the realm of reality the absurdity isn't even worth taken seriously , it's laughable

Ronnie 2003 would be noticeably bigger at the expense of density , dryness , detail , balance & proportion the bigger softer size does not and would not account for his deficit in these areas this is how contests are judged , this is what you and Neo have a hard time grasping , whatever worked against Jay and Dexter and Gunther in 2003 does NOT apply to Dorian Yates