Author Topic: Paco vs Atwood  (Read 8276 times)

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Paco vs Atwood
« on: July 23, 2010, 04:38:56 PM »
Who has/had the worst structure ?
















SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49679
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2010, 04:40:48 PM »
Definitely Paco.  Look how long his torso is. Plus, he is a perfect square. At least Atwood has some shape to him, not much, but still better than Paco.
X

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2010, 04:43:27 PM »
Add that Greek dude Mike Kilifoclo-whatever his name is.
People say Art had a big chest, I don't see it, I mean, it may be big, but on his stucture it is not. They both look odd as hell, like some blind muscle schmoe just sewed together bodyparts

oldman

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 882
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2010, 04:46:53 PM »
then u better add Dennis James in that mix...

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17201
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2010, 04:47:20 PM »
Who has/had the worst structure ?



Atwood looks horrible in this pic. Droopy chest (and also a bump on his left pec, wth), small forearms plus the ridiculous thong (looks like he was going to a G4P session) and brutal baldness.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2010, 04:48:57 PM »
Definitely Paco.  Look how long his torso is. Plus, he is a perfect square. At least Atwood has some shape to him, not much, but still better than Paco.
I agree

Add that Greek dude Mike Kilifoclo-whatever his name is.
People say Art had a big chest, I don't see it, I mean, it may be big, but on his stucture it is not. They both look odd as hell, like some blind muscle schmoe just sewed together bodyparts
Big chest in the side tri



Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2010, 04:53:57 PM »
Atwood actually has wide lats and some sort of taper. Paco has nothing, hes a box. I dont know why people called Cutler the fridge when Paco is competeing.
Seriously, gotta hand it to Paco that he did the best with what hes got. But hes flat out the worst structure and aesthetics ive ever seen on a BB. What a waste of muscle.  :-\

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49679
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2010, 04:59:36 PM »
I agree
 Big chest in the side tri




His the first pic photoshopped? His hamstrings look unreal  :o :o
X

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2010, 05:03:04 PM »
No its not, Atwoods muscle literally hung off his bone, his muscle was odd looking too, very pumped up looking, like his chest and traps. The man was a monster.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2010, 05:03:25 PM »
I agree
 Big chest in the side tri



Artwood's hams look odd in that shot, like they are lower than his quads, look at Paco's versus his. Even though Artwood's pop out, they (the hams) should be exactly opposite of the quads

and whoever said Dennis James, DJ has a excellent structure, he looked his best when he turned pro back in 1998.

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2010, 05:08:56 PM »
Paco wins.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2010, 05:20:22 PM »
They both have structures adapted for lifting heavy objects. I can imagine Paco as some sort of 14th century stonemason or woodsman.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16145
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2010, 05:25:36 PM »
That conditioning is just unbelieveable. Seriously, I think that guy has surpassed Munzer when it comes to being shredded and dry.


BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19678
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2010, 06:19:09 PM »
Bay likey!  :P

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2010, 12:32:26 AM »
That conditioning is just unbelieveable. Seriously, I think that guy has surpassed Munzer when it comes to being shredded and dry.




nah.

no one is more ripped than mr. ripped.

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2010, 12:46:38 AM »
Bay likey!  :P
For a gay black man, you like the most unsymmetrical, unbalance white men. I swear you ARE like a stereotypical straight black man who likes ugly white women.

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2010, 01:49:23 AM »
For a gay black man, you like the most unsymmetrical, unbalance white men. I swear you ARE like a stereotypical straight black man who likes ugly white women.
;D

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2010, 02:01:32 AM »
;D
For real, man. Dude likes those genetically handicapped men, the ones borne from a cesspool of discarded genes. A hodgepodge of misfit bodyparts and extra chromosomes.

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2010, 02:09:28 AM »
For real, man. Dude likes those genetically handicapped men, the ones borne from a cesspool of discarded genes. A hodgepodge of misfit bodyparts and extra chromosomes.
Yes Bays taste does seem rather odd no homo  ;D

Silverback Gorilla

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #19 on: July 24, 2010, 02:14:31 AM »
For real, man. Dude likes those genetically handicapped men, the ones borne from a cesspool of discarded genes. A hodgepodge of misfit bodyparts and extra chromosomes.
Damn bruh', that's cold  :D
I'm goin' in...

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #20 on: July 24, 2010, 02:47:51 AM »
Damn bruh', that's cold  :D
Have you seen the dudes, i mean I think Bay fantasizes about a muscular Elephant Man..."Ohhh the lump on the side of his head....if only he had trunk."

Yes Bays taste does seem rather odd no homo  ;D
Bay is cool dude no doubt, intellectually engaging, i just wish he'd engaged the aesthetic side of his brain. it might be a good thing that he was never a judge. Otherwise, Flex Wheeler, Shawn Ray, Milos, Richard Jones, Kev Levrone, Vince Taylor would never have won a contest. Instead  Greg Kovac, Fux, and the current melted iteration of Ronnie Coleman would be winning.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #21 on: July 24, 2010, 05:24:53 AM »
PACO ALL DAY.

oldman

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 882
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #22 on: July 24, 2010, 07:13:27 AM »
They took their physiques to the limit, good or bad structure.

What is Atwood up to these days...I bet he is smaller...hint hint

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #23 on: July 24, 2010, 07:19:21 AM »
For a gay black man, you like the most unsymmetrical, unbalance white men. I swear you ARE like a stereotypical straight black man who likes ugly white women.

LMAOOOOOO

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19678
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #24 on: July 24, 2010, 08:14:35 AM »
That conditioning is just unbelieveable. Seriously, I think that guy has surpassed Munzer when it comes to being shredded and dry.



No one can be like Munzer (unless you want to be dead).  But you are right: this is unbelievable conditioning!