"yes, but the majority of them....."
6 billion people on the planet but folks can proudly claim to know, "the majority of them"

Betty Frieden (an American feminist) claims that ALL men are potential rapists. Assuming that Betty has personally met 10,000 men in her lifetime and that half of people on the planet are men, Betty is making these conclusions based on less that .00001% of information.
Assume that Hitler met 1000 Jews in his early formative years. There are roughly 300 million Jewish peopke in the world. So he based his conclusions of inferiority off of .0003% of information.
Roughly 1.4 Billion "African" people. How many have you personally met to make claims about the whole?
Roughly 1.4 Billion "Chinese" people. How many have you personally met to make claims about the whole?
Roughly 900 Million "Indian" people. How many have you personally met to make claims about the whole?
Roughly 325 Million "American" people. How many have you personally met to make claims about the whole?
Roughly 1.5 Billion "Muslim" people. How many have you personally met to make claims about the whole?
Roughly 250 Million "Eastern European" people. How many have you personally met to make claims about the whole?
do you understand yet?
It is an
unscientific mind that generalizes to such an extent, and a particulary weak one that infuses that generalization with as an amorphic quality as 'hate'.
Change your language and you change your life. Use 'seems to me' instead of 'is' when describing your world. For example,
1. 'Blacks seem to me to be inferior' versus 'Blacks are inferior'.
2. 'Jews seem to me to control everything' versus 'Jews control everything'.
3. 'Women seem like sluts to me' versus 'Women are sluts'.
3. 'Terrorists hate our freedoms' versus 'Terrorists seem to hate our freedoms to me'
4. 'Jesus is the truth' versus 'Jesus seems to be the truth to me'
5. 'Liberals are communists' versus 'Liberals seem like communists to me'
6. 'The fetus is a baby' versus 'The fetus seems lke a baby to me'
7. Insert your own predjudice here____________________
____________
It's difficult for humans to talk in abstractions. Our central nervous systems seem to "need" to encode a static based reality where we can say this 'is' or 'isnt'. The nature of our universe appears to be quite different though. We appear to be in constant change or flux even on a sub-atomic level. To say something 'is' or 'isn't' appears relative
only to the known information
at the time.
be smarter than this men...and remember that reality
to start with is constantly perceived through your optic nerves 'upside down'...it's our brains that then re-configure the image!
