Author Topic: Judge's Personal Life Debated After Gay Ruling  (Read 6107 times)

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Judge's Personal Life Debated After Gay Ruling
« Reply #125 on: August 11, 2010, 07:15:05 PM »
Apparently the rest of us are not as fluent in stupid as Tony is.

Hence the conversation with himself.
LOL you plan on elaborating or just using ad homenim attacks to distract from the issue?

we were at the reasoning for seperating by gender is for "sexuality reasons" please elaborate on that for me...

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33690
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Judge's Personal Life Debated After Gay Ruling
« Reply #126 on: August 12, 2010, 06:04:16 AM »
You are asking me to explain your own failing logic? 

Another sign you are out of material. 

Are you "legally" retarded?

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Judge's Personal Life Debated After Gay Ruling
« Reply #127 on: August 12, 2010, 06:56:00 AM »
You are asking me to explain your own failing logic? 

Another sign you are out of material. 

Are you "legally" retarded?
LOL wow...

lets review

you said that men and women are seperated in locker rooms b/c of gender...which is true

when asked the reasonig behind seperating by gender you said it was for sexuality reasons...

I asked you to elaborate on YOUR POINT...and I cant explain my own logic?

LMAO

just please elaborate on YOUR OWN POINT that we seperate by gender b/c of sexuality...

Im waiting...

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33690
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Judge's Personal Life Debated After Gay Ruling
« Reply #128 on: August 12, 2010, 08:20:59 AM »
LOL wow...

lets review

you said that men and women are seperated in locker rooms b/c of gender...which is true

when asked the reasonig behind seperating by gender you said it was for sexuality reasons...

I asked you to elaborate on YOUR POINT...and I cant explain my own logic?

LMAO

just please elaborate on YOUR OWN POINT that we seperate by gender b/c of sexuality...

Im waiting...

Again, you spin your wheels in circles simply because you have nowhere to take this conversation anymore since you have FAILED.

I bolded the parts above which is yet one more contradiction that you have uttered on here.

If you don't understand the difference between gender and sexuality, then I can't help you there.  Just like no one else could help you with your original whinefest about it resulting in "legal harassment" which you made the cornerstone of your (failing) argument.  Neither gender nor sexuality equates, contributes, or causes "legal harassment"  Now you want to play a little baiting game and split the conversation down into arguing juvenile semantics in hopes that someone else will explain your own logic to you.

No wonder you are still waiting.  Childish games like this is above the rest of us.



tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: Judge's Personal Life Debated After Gay Ruling
« Reply #129 on: August 12, 2010, 09:34:52 AM »
Again, you spin your wheels in circles simply because you have nowhere to take this conversation anymore since you have FAILED.

I bolded the parts above which is yet one more contradiction that you have uttered on here.

If you don't understand the difference between gender and sexuality, then I can't help you there.  Just like no one else could help you with your original whinefest about it resulting in "legal harassment" which you made the cornerstone of your (failing) argument.  Neither gender nor sexuality equates, contributes, or causes "legal harassment"  Now you want to play a little baiting game and split the conversation down into arguing juvenile semantics in hopes that someone else will explain your own logic to you.

No wonder you are still waiting.  Childish games like this is above the rest of us.
LOL lurker I apologize I misread your statement,

you say its b/c of gender...you can agree on that?

what is the reasoning behind using gender