Apology to Goodrum (no joke)

[Vince B]

My position re gays is that there are more women for us men. Lesbians are another matter but that is the way it goes.

Goodrum has used his wit to calculate the advantages of his lifestyle. There might be some shit associated with it but think of all the money he saves!

[Mr Nobody]

While I do have a few contributors to the new site, the majority of the articles are and will be written by me.  You do seem angry and its prob because you realize that my web skills are better than yours.  Of course, you haven't seen nothing yet. 

Tune in to more stuff at Muscle World Order at www.muscleworldorder.com.  Phase 2 of the site is coming soon!!!   

Looks pretty decent Vince will phase 2 sell sex toys as well?

[che]

While I do have a few contributors to the new site, the majority of the articles are and will be written by me.  You do seem angry and its prob because you realize that my web skills are better than yours.  Of course, you haven't seen nothing yet. 

Tune in to more stuff at Muscle World Order at www.muscleworldorder.com.  Phase 2 of the site is coming soon!!!   

Where are your pics Vince?

[kiwiol]

Everthing in life is a choice whether you're straight or not.  To say otherwise is to belive that that there are forces out there greater than your free will.  Maybe that's good enough for the religious and beta males in society...but not for real men.

 

That is true, but only in regards to your actions, not your emotions or your feelings (which are the end result of your value judgement system).

So you have the choice of not acting upon your emotions / cravings, but not the choice of how an external influence (be it a person or a situation or a product or whatever) affects the way you feel about it. If you're straight, then you don't choose whether or not you are attracted to someone of the opposite sex that you think is attractive, but you you can choose whether or not to act upon it, or even to acknowledge it to yourself.

I'd say homosexuality is definitely biological in origin for some percentage of the gay population. But there are also those who probably belong to that group triggered solely by external influences.

It's no different than eating meat as opposed to being a vegetarian - you don't choose whether you like the taste of meat or not, but you can choose to eat it or not. Some people naturally like the taste of meat, others don't, while others get an acquired taste for it just like some others develop a distaste for it over time and so on.

[Coach is Back!]

Very scientific finding Vince, you're brilliant (geez)!

[WillGrant]

v

[Vince B]

Homosexuality is a mystery to evolutionary theorists. All characteristics of humans are inherited and evolved because of natural selection. So how did homosexuality get passed on? What advantage to the species is it? The only thing that makes partial sense is that perhaps homosexuals have genes that don't benefit the species directly. Maybe they are destined to be like worker ants and not pass on their genes. If so, how come there are still gays and lesbians today and no shortage of them, either? I haven't read a satisfactory account of why homosexuality has evolved to be something like 4 to 10% of the population.

[disturbia]

Homosexuality is a mystery to evolutionary theorists. All characteristics of humans are inherited and evolved because of natural selection. So how did homosexuality get passed on? What advantage to the species is it? The only thing that makes partial sense is that perhaps homosexuals have genes that don't benefit the species directly. Maybe they are destined to be like worker ants and not pass on their genes. If so, how come there are still gays and lesbians today and no shortage of them, either? I haven't read a satisfactory account of why homosexuality has evolved to be something like 4 to 10% of the population.

shut
the
fuk
up

[Vince B]

Josh, even Borderlines can't kill everyone!

[drkaje]

Homosexuality is a mystery to evolutionary theorists. All characteristics of humans are inherited and evolved because of natural selection. So how did homosexuality get passed on? What advantage to the species is it? The only thing that makes partial sense is that perhaps homosexuals have genes that don't benefit the species directly. Maybe they are destined to be like worker ants and not pass on their genes. If so, how come there are still gays and lesbians today and no shortage of them, either? I haven't read a satisfactory account of why homosexuality has evolved to be something like 4 to 10% of the population.

Maybe it's a form of mental disease, genetic defect or something like that.

[disturbia]

i dont care if a guy is with a guy

just dont call him a wife---its a guy, not a girl--a woman is a wife--a guy in no way shape or form can be awife

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

Looks pretty decent Vince will phase 2 sell sex toys as well?

 

You'll see. 

[drkaje]

i dont care if a guy is with a guy

just dont call him a wife---its a guy, not a girl--a woman is a wife--a guy in no way shape or form can be awife

What if he puts on tons of pancake makeup and a brightly colored scarf?!?

[Mr Nobody]

LMAO 

[SF1900]

Homosexuality is a mystery to evolutionary theorists. All characteristics of humans are inherited and evolved because of natural selection. So how did homosexuality get passed on? What advantage to the species is it? The only thing that makes partial sense is that perhaps homosexuals have genes that don't benefit the species directly. Maybe they are destined to be like worker ants and not pass on their genes. If so, how come there are still gays and lesbians today and no shortage of them, either? I haven't read a satisfactory account of why homosexuality has evolved to be something like 4 to 10% of the population.

Basile, I destroyed your last statement about homosexuality not being an option. You failed to respond.

Now, you start spewing this. Actually, evolutionary theorists have proposed why homosexuality might be beneficial. Here is one opinion:

The kin selection hypothesis, introduced in the 1970s, proposed a possible advantage homosexuality would have for humans. The hypothesis says that while homosexual individuals do not directly pass on their genes to successive generations by having children, they indirectly spread their genes through their families.

By devoting their energy to raise their nieces and nephews instead of having children of their own, homosexuals would allow their siblings to have more children and ensure that these offspring live to have children of their own. Thus, homosexual individuals would promote greater reproductive and survival rates of the relatives who share many identical genes with them — including those that may contribute to homosexuality — guaranteeing these genes are passed on to future family members.

On top of that. E.O. Wilson of Harvard University discusses in great length the evolutionary advantage to bisexuality. Obviously, not homosexuality, but you get my drift.

Vince, you are not a scientist. Stop spewing bullshit. Go read an empirical journal article.

[chaos]

What if he puts on tons of pancake makeup and a brightly colored scarf?!?

Oh god, you're just asking for it.

[disturbia]

Oh god, you're just asking for it.

Im naming my new dog chaos von avidan

[Coach is Back!]

In laymens terms it isn't natural for a penis to squeez into a spincter. Its an exit only orafice in case some people (gay people) are still confused.

[che]

In laymens terms it isn't natural for a penis to squeez into a spincter. Its an exit only orafice in case some people (gay people) are still confused.

Have you ever fucked your wife(ex wives ) in the ass ?

[drkaje]

Oh god, you're just asking for it.

Mi Mi (from the Drew Carey show) had on less makeup, FFS!!

[chaos]

Im naming my new dog chaos von avidan

[benchmstr]

Homosexuality is a mystery to evolutionary theorists. All characteristics of humans are inherited and evolved because of natural selection. So how did homosexuality get passed on? What advantage to the species is it? The only thing that makes partial sense is that perhaps homosexuals have genes that don't benefit the species directly. Maybe they are destined to be like worker ants and not pass on their genes. If so, how come there are still gays and lesbians today and no shortage of them, either? I haven't read a satisfactory account of why homosexuality has evolved to be something like 4 to 10% of the population.

its not a hard theory to crack....its just another extreme sexual perversion......just like people who moleste children, fuck animals, or dress up in cartoon animal costumes and have orgy's.....its the same shit.....but turned into a almost acceptable life style...

bench

[Coach is Back!]

Che, no!

[benchmstr]

Che, no!

its ok...really overated though...

bench

[drkaje]

Che, no!

Anal neglect is a sin, Coach.