Well, you said that Flava Flav was sucessful and then said Boom! afterwards when Billy called Fox successful.
I just wanted to get an idea of what the appropriate measuring stick was, so I took the opposite of Fox News and the opposite of Flava Flav.
If being successful is Fox News and Flava Flav and being unsuccessful is MSNBC and _______ , could we also then reach the conclusion that comparing a cable news network to a drug addicted hype man from an early 90's rap group who briefly stared on a reality TV show is probably closer to apples and bowling balls?
Why not include Oprah, Bill Gates, Facebook, DELL, Warren Buffet, Drew Brees, Lucy Liu, Shogun Rua, Kobe Bryant, or 1000000 other successful people or entities?
If your point is that people are stupid, then what would your explanation be if a cable news network that was more in sync with your personal political views was # 1, instead of #234? What if instead of conservative talk show hosts dominating the airwaves, Al Franken had stayed relevant and not bankrupted the only self proclaimed "liberal" radio station?