The funniest thing is that his 0.0035% calculation for black people would be a fair "non-discriminatory" figure anyway.
Black people only represent 12% of the population to begin with. A completely non-partisan event would only have 12 out of every 100 individuals.
But, this event wasn't exactly non-partisan. It wasn't necessarily a "republican" event, but liberals aren't going to be showing up to an event with a conservative talk show host is there to talk about God....
Given the fact that somewhere around 95%-97% of voting blacks voted for Obama, you can assume that only about 1 in 40 blacks would have any interest in attending a Glenn Beck rally. If you take into account the religious nature of this event, and realize that of those 3% of blacks who are politically conservative are fiscal conservatives and not necessarily part of the religious right.....you could say that only about 3 out of every 5 of those 3% of black conservatives are also religious conservatives.
So, of the 12 out of every 100 Americans who are black, only about 3 of 5 of the 1 in 40 conservative blacks would be at the event if it was 100% non-discriminatory in any way to blacks who would ever think of attending an event such as this.
In other words, only about 0.00216% of black people should be there if there were NO discrimination at all.
The fuckface showed that a HIGHER percentage of black people were at the event compared to the specific religious right subset of the black population! Maybe he can show that there didn't seem to be any British born Australian citizens of bi-racial parents with physical disabilities too!
