Author Topic: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)  (Read 11378 times)

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« on: September 16, 2010, 08:50:21 PM »

G_Thang

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19757
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies!
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2010, 09:03:25 PM »
 ::)

Great posing routine.


SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49828
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2010, 09:26:55 PM »


That front double bi at 3:20 is damn impressive. Great arms. Were people using synthol back then?
X

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2010, 10:02:20 PM »
when i met him he said to someone near 'hang on this big fukker is gonna snap my arm'.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2010, 10:24:31 PM »
when i met him he said to someone near 'hang on this big fukker is gonna snap my arm'.

not sure if you matching up to him but actually bigger!

cant tell with the angle, but you may be wider?

 :o

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2010, 10:54:37 PM »
not sure if you matching up to him but actually bigger!

cant tell with the angle, but you may be wider?

 :o

from the pros i've met i think my measurements were similar, my muscles just didnt' 'pop' like the pros. my arms were big in the insertions, so i didn't have that difference in size at the joints. i always trained super heavy and i'm pretty sure it caused alot of connective tissue growth, which turned out to be a bad thing. the pros have super tiny joints, making the muscle look more dramatic.

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2010, 11:24:47 PM »
I've got some pics of me and Mike stashed somewhere. I gotta go look. Mike has that tiny head, which in turn makes his body look even bigger.

It's hard not to just keep staring at his insane calves when you are around him. These days? Not so much. His calves are still huge, but he is a LOT smaller.


As far as Synthol, I'm pretty sure it was more of a site-injection thingy. It looked like he used the same spot over and over. I actually have some pics that show big-azz purple welts on both biceps and triceps that look like nasty spider bites. Either way, he injected deep enough into the muscle that he didn't have that bulbous (like that word?)- swollen, blurry red look that so many guys have from only tapping the surface.


It's pretty scary shit. I think a few of the "smarter"(?) Pro BB's would have someone who was knowledgeable (like a doctor-ish type) of person do the deep injections. That way you could push the muscle up from deep inside and NOT hit any arteries (whatever) or nerves.


For awhile there, some of the Amateur shows were getting pretty stupid with the Synthol surface delt injections. I mean, these guys would literally walk out on stage with sharp points on the lateral heads of their delts. It was so obvious it was almost embarrassing.


Then there's the monthly pics of Greg the Dipshit Valvolino posting up every month in MD as if that type of thing is cool...


Whatevah.

Luolamies

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2520
  • Getbig!
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2010, 03:27:26 AM »
Too bad what happened to Mike seems like a really cool guy and he truly was a mass monster.
I don't think synthol use was wide spread, but esiclene use sure was...
TEST+DECA+DBOL=BIG

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2010, 05:26:15 AM »
he also had very good delts and at times, crazy conditioning.

surely he was using seo's, not necessarily synthol, though. great arms nevertheless!

is the peanut butter thing true, dyslexic?

doison

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3448
  • Rum Ham
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2010, 05:30:15 AM »
That front double bi at 3:20 is damn impressive. Great arms. Were people using synthol back then?

Mike was one of the early pioneers of site injections in the arms.  You can see an injection site bruise on his right biceps and a lump from a day-or-two old injection site on the same biceps.  You can see the scar tissue build up on the left triceps too.  Those are visible all around the 3:00-3:30 time range.
Y

littleguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2010, 12:25:23 PM »
Back in these days Esiclene was the choice. It was a short lasting swell, I had friends that used it to compete, put it in their calves and bi's....swelling was nice and back to normal in 3-4 days.....no residual effects..

Not sure why it became defunct. I heard Flex would use dozens of esiclene shots in his back to make it pop.

Synthol wasnt around then and if it was, it was only a posing oil

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2010, 12:31:18 PM »
when i met him he said to someone near 'hang on this big fukker is gonna snap my arm'.
You do have some brutal looking forarms in that pic! Did you ever compete?
Mike M was a cool guy, and  one of my favorite all time pros.

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2010, 12:43:04 PM »
You do have some brutal looking forarms in that pic! Did you ever compete?
Mike M was a cool guy, and  one of my favorite all time pros.

these old things?

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2010, 02:05:58 PM »
these old things?

fukn hell mate, thats an arm

did u never compete?

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2010, 02:07:33 PM »
fukn hell mate, thats an arm

did u never compete?

yeah, quite a few times

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #15 on: September 17, 2010, 02:20:14 PM »
yeah, quite a few times

u american i take it?

many years at the nationals then?

what age are u?

u must have competed with some names ?

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #16 on: September 17, 2010, 02:22:56 PM »
u american i take it?

many years at the nationals then?

what age are u?

u must have competed with some names ?

actually from Canada. did the nationals several times from 1991 to 2007. always lost.

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #17 on: September 17, 2010, 02:35:15 PM »
actually from Canada. did the nationals several times from 1991 to 2007. always lost.

woow

u musta competed with a bunch of names onstage at the same show(s)

ur not the blow yer own trumpet kinda guy then?... most people who have actually done the deed, dont feel the need to shout about it...

im not familiar with the american/canadian amateur bb history at all.....

however iam a bit of a pro bb and nabba amateur historian of sorts.

forgive me if i should know ur name.

which years did u make a splash etc?..u posted ur contest history ?

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #18 on: September 17, 2010, 02:43:39 PM »
he also had very good delts and at times, crazy conditioning.

surely he was using seo's, not necessarily synthol, though. great arms nevertheless!

is the peanut butter thing true, dyslexic?
His conditioning was so-so, I have the 93 Mr. O, and he was a crowd favorite, but he lacked a good chest, back, okay abs, decent leg detail, he was arms and calves, and even his arms were not all that. They lacked detail, they were of the "sasauge arm" variety...when he did a double Biceps shot, he clacked the detail split between bis and tris, and his arms lacked that real "pop" to them...bis were big, just lacked detail, that Pro contest award winning detail, he was good for getting the crowd involved, that was it.

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #19 on: September 17, 2010, 02:51:26 PM »
actually from Canada. did the nationals several times from 1991 to 2007. always lost.
You look big and impressive but perhaps you don't pop when on stage. I always had to suck down under 200 to get that really ripped look and then was not as thick at 5'10".  No matter, you impressed us here at get big with that massive formarm

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #20 on: September 17, 2010, 03:49:36 PM »
my biggest problems were - i  never competed two years in a row, they don't see you if they aren't looking for you, and i always missed my peak.
here's me in 1991 weighing 240 (5'9.5")  and again in 2007 weighing 234.5 onstage


Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2010, 04:57:59 AM »
His conditioning was so-so, I have the 93 Mr. O, and he was a crowd favorite, but he lacked a good chest, back, okay abs, decent leg detail, he was arms and calves, and even his arms were not all that. They lacked detail, they were of the "sasauge arm" variety...when he did a double Biceps shot, he clacked the detail split between bis and tris, and his arms lacked that real "pop" to them...bis were big, just lacked detail, that Pro contest award winning detail, he was good for getting the crowd involved, that was it.
yes, great arms and calves, but mismatched physique, did a lot of guest posing with de mayo, both were huge fan favorites

he had poor upper pecs, back, long torso, and not the best shaped thighs, did come in great shape at the usa and couple of shows. he almost died the one time he came in looking like a muscled cadaver(you know what I mean ::))


Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #22 on: September 19, 2010, 04:58:58 AM »
my biggest problems were - i  never competed two years in a row, they don't see you if they aren't looking for you, and i always missed my peak.
here's me in 1991 weighing 240 (5'9.5")  and again in 2007 weighing 234.5 onstage



wow!

what future pros did you compete with, hazbin?

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #23 on: September 19, 2010, 09:28:48 AM »
That front double bi at 3:20 is damn impressive. Great arms. Were people using synthol back then?

Yeah he's really blurry around the tris and rear delts, kind of fishy looking ?!?!?!?!

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Mike Matarazzo... then a bunch of twinks (including Jay)
« Reply #24 on: September 19, 2010, 09:42:49 AM »
my biggest problems were - i  never competed two years in a row, they don't see you if they aren't looking for you, and i always missed my peak.
here's me in 1991 weighing 240 (5'9.5")  and again in 2007 weighing 234.5 onstage



What was your cycle like?  ???