Author Topic: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?  (Read 46891 times)

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Layne will be making his pro debut this weekend at the IFPA Pro International in Kansas City, Kansas.

Between 2002-2006 I think the majority opinion was that he was natural.  Since then I feel that the majority opinion is that he uses.  Discuss.
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Master Blaster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6610
  • Not sure if getbig full of trolls or trolls getbig
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2010, 09:12:26 PM »
I just pm'd gh15.

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2010, 09:16:29 PM »
I just pm'd gh15.

Hey thanks man!!

Never mind, the picture is old.  From Layne:

Quote
thanks so much everyone. actually the picture posted in the first page is 11 weeks out. my avatar is 8 weeks out. I will post pics the morning of the show in this thread for you guys

Regardless, a thread I had been meaning to post recently was with the question of what the consensus was regarding Layne.  From what I gather reading the boards I would say the consensus is that Layne is not natural.  Is that accurate?
Bodybuilding Pro.com

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2010, 09:17:23 PM »
he looks incredibly mediocre

titusisback

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5433
  • Team Ban Mom Lostabet
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2010, 09:18:34 PM »
pro debut

pro debut?  ???

what's the prize money?

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2010, 09:29:44 PM »
he looks incredibly mediocre

Really?  He would literally be one of the top five best built men in the city I am in.  He must be a lean 200+ at 5'10 and 1/2.

pro debut?  ???

what's the prize money?

They will be throwing a 0 onto his paycheck!
Bodybuilding Pro.com

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2010, 09:30:42 PM »
looks natural to me

benchmstr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12476
  • Raging drunk
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2010, 09:33:34 PM »
Really?  He would literally be one of the top five best built men in the city I am in.  He must be a lean 200+ at 5'10 and 1/2.
he just doesnt seem like anything special to me......i dont really think he is on anything other than OTC stuff to be honest....he isnt really impressive...

bench

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2010, 09:39:58 PM »
he just doesnt seem like anything special to me......i dont really think he is on anything other than OTC stuff to be honest....he isnt really impressive...

bench

Maybe I'm easily impressed but I think he's huge.  Although given I am smaller than usual right now I guess he looks more impressive to me than he usually does.  Once I get my website updated with the new Joomla content management system in place, I will focus on bodybuilding.  For now, that is my priority but I still want to exercise between now and then for good health.
Bodybuilding Pro.com

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2010, 09:42:54 PM »
Really?  He would literally be one of the top five best built men in the city I am in.  He must be a lean 200+ at 5'10 and 1/2.

They will be throwing a 0 onto his paycheck!

so hed be one of the top 5 in a podunk town in nowhere canada?  :D

benchmstr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12476
  • Raging drunk
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #10 on: September 16, 2010, 09:43:37 PM »
Maybe I'm easily impressed but I think he's huge.  Although given I am smaller than usual right now I guess he looks more impressive to me than he usually does.  Once I get my website updated with the new Joomla content management system in place, I will focus on bodybuilding.  For now, that is my priority but I still want to exercise between now and then for good health.
something else you have to consider is the photo above makes him look a lot bigger than he is...the guy has size, im not saying he doesnt....but he doesnt really have the thickness....if he was standing sideways in that pic i think a lot of people would lean toward natural...

bench

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #11 on: September 16, 2010, 10:12:33 PM »
Once again, you look at that picture right there and all i see is a mediocre physique.  The ONLY reason his name gets mentioned is cause hes a big mouth who claims natural status. 
Leafy Bug has built a better body than this, mostly just due to structure.

HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2010, 10:14:30 PM »
Very natural gym body there.
A

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2010, 11:13:13 PM »
so hed be one of the top 5 in a podunk town in nowhere canada?  :D

Maybe so, but there are still 110,000 people here.  There are lots of juicers around here and only a few are bigger than him, at least when his condition is considered.

something else you have to consider is the photo above makes him look a lot bigger than he is...the guy has size, im not saying he doesnt....but he doesnt really have the thickness....if he was standing sideways in that pic i think a lot of people would lean toward natural...

bench

That's true.
Bodybuilding Pro.com

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2010, 11:16:03 PM »
This topic is so endlessly funny. I know lots of big, fat fucks who juice to the gills that don't even look like bodybuilders. I also know little twinks that take everything under the sun.


You would be amazed at what you can do.... if you just do it right. If your gonna juice, do it right and get your $$$$$$'s worth.

ygbodybuilder10

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 308
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #15 on: September 17, 2010, 12:23:14 AM »
layne is natural, he has helped me alot when i was younger.
Team SCI-FIT

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #16 on: September 17, 2010, 12:40:30 AM »
This topic is so endlessly funny. I know lots of big, fat fucks who juice to the gills that don't even look like bodybuilders. I also know little twinks that take everything under the sun.


You would be amazed at what you can do.... if you just do it right. If your gonna juice, do it right and get your $$$$$$'s worth.

I think you might be right.  If I my deadlift was closing in on 500 at 170 and eating fuck all, I could only imagine it would be a lot higher if I just tried.  For a guy with Layne's dedication and limb length advantage, 600 is believable to me.  But the thing is, now he is deadlifting 700 or more, so I admit I do have my doubts about him at times.  What is the highest deadlift?
Bodybuilding Pro.com

blackpele

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 464
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #17 on: September 17, 2010, 02:48:22 AM »
He is natural , his muscles doesn't have the chemical look and I guess at 6 foot height he is under 225 pounds, so it is unlikely that he uses.

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #18 on: September 17, 2010, 04:32:33 AM »

buffdnet

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 840
  • fuck the pope
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #19 on: September 17, 2010, 04:37:01 AM »
not this shit again.

Red Hook

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4403
Re: Layne Norton - September 2010.
« Reply #20 on: September 17, 2010, 04:56:03 AM »
Maybe I'm easily impressed but I think he's huge.  Although given I am smaller than usual right now I guess he looks more impressive to me than he usually does.  Once I get my website updated with the new Joomla content management system in place, I will focus on bodybuilding.  For now, that is my priority but I still want to exercise between now and then for good health.

you should look into Drupal instead of Joomla.

also you are comparing him to every day "normal" people while these guys are comparing him to other bodybuilders.

for every day walking around the city, hitting the social scene and picking up chicks his builld is ideal

in the BB world he is "meh" or "blah"..and for the record he is not natty..deal with it
I

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17035
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #21 on: September 17, 2010, 05:13:42 AM »
Discuss.

What is the status of you coming out of the 'anabolics user' closet?

Discuss Matt's anabolics usage. When did he start using?

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #22 on: September 17, 2010, 05:18:16 AM »
If he told me he was natty I would believe him. Maybe you guys think I am niave.

doison

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3448
  • Rum Ham
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #23 on: September 17, 2010, 05:32:56 AM »
Layne will be making his pro debut this weekend at the IFPA Pro International in Kansas City, Kansas.

Between 2002-2006 I think the majority opinion was that he was natural.  Since then I feel that the majority opinion is that he uses.  Discuss.

Why?  He's only added a few lbs at most since 2006.  He's continued to train the entire time, I would expect any serious lifter (enhanced or not) to gain at least a lb or two every 4-8 years. 
Is averaging a lb of muscle gain every 2-3 years enough to cast suspicion now?
Y

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Layne Norton - What is the consensus on his status [natural/enhanced]?
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2010, 05:33:49 AM »
synthol