Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)

[Matt C]

This pic is circa 94?

back then wouldve thought, bananas, healthy.

now, its a big guy with muscles, wearing daisy duke cut-offs, holding a plate of phalic fruit...

It's interesting how reality changes perception.

[brent2741]

looks better in gym shot overall

most people do

[Palpatine Q]

idiot............for the 100th millionth time


you cannot compare post-workout pump photos ..............TO STAGE SHOTS






the "pump" you have after doing a chest and shoulder workout...particularly a pro bodybuilder, who probably just injected 20 units of humalog and drank a carbo force




is nothing like standing around  in posing trunks for a couple of hours backstage waiting to go on the standing for 15 minutes under lights in a cold room......then being shuffeled around, sent backstage for an hour.........then back out

you flatten out,





thats why those pictures you see of bodybuilders in magazines, with the sick bulging veins crazy pump...........is NEVER replicated on stage, the conditions are different





no bodybuilder looks they do in gym photos on stage

take for example, the most famous "gym-pump-pic-mr. olympia" dennis james.......have you EVER saw dennis james look on stage like he does in this photo??




NO, if he did , he would have been a multiple time mr O

Since when have you become an authority on.....well, everything.... apparently

[donrhummy]

idiot............for the 100th millionth time

Well, since you asked so nicely...

[hench]

from these you can see the forearms are smaller, bi's are smaller as are the calves, thighs dont look as dense

Well, since you asked so nicely...

[affeman]

He really was better in 2001, way better. And even last year. Everyone who says this year he was just as good as last year is out of his mind.

[Deicide]

In 2001 his pecs were way thicker! What the hell happened?!

[G_Thang]

jay has the coolest crib vids and is money earning but he is winning O titles with leg cuts.  what happen to mr o and the GREAT back ala yates, haney and ronnie?  dex's yr dont matter.

[Lion666]

2001 - 2nd place
2009 - 1st place

What progress!

2001 jay = cool build

[~UN_$ung~]

Well, since you asked so nicely...

lol

[dyslexic]

Lighting is everything...


more than most here will ever begin to fathom.

[~UN_$ung~]

Since when have you become an authority on.....well, everything.... apparently

authority..........??


thats whats knows as "common knowledge"



like if i said that the earth is the third planet from our sun, or that there are 12 months in the Gregorian calander.........what i said was the bodybuilding equivalent if this kind of simple information

[_bruce_]

Shocking how his arms shrunk.

[~UN_$ung~]

Shocking how his arms shrunk.

where do you see his arms shrunk exactly?

[Wee Laddy]

The photo of 2010 is misleading.  The lighting is darker and his shadows blend into the background.

[~UN_$ung~]

The photo of 2010 is misleading.  The lighting is darker and his shadows blend into the background.

good work, that puts it into a good perspective

[phyxsius]

Jay got bigger but less cuts

[The Ugly]

Well, since you asked so nicely...

So much for muscle maturity.

[donrhummy]

The photo of 2010 is misleading.  The lighting is darker and his shadows blend into the background.

Three things:

1. Look at his left hand, the 2010 is slightly too large (assuming you didn't alter the images other than birghtness/contrast, that's my fault, I guess i made the 2010 too big)

2. I notice you lifted the 2010 picture up! The bottom shows his knees are too high as well as his head! This makes him appear bigger.

3. The reason the lighting is that way is I put completely untouched photos together. You altered them.

[donrhummy]

Here's a more accurate gif using your image but not lifted up higher. You can see the accuracy if you look at the inner tricep of his right arm (on the left side of the pic) where it matches perfectly in towards his pec between the two pics.