Author Topic: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been  (Read 3813 times)

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« on: September 26, 2010, 05:51:02 AM »
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007


choice is an illusion

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2010, 05:54:40 AM »
thats why this whole "sport" is a joke.

~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2010, 05:57:15 AM »
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007






as i said to another guy, lucky for us........competent judges who understand the criteria by which bodybuilding contests are judged were responsible for the results tonight



and not you, who didnt want jay to win cause the other guy looked "prettier" :-\

G_Thang

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19757
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies!
Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2010, 06:02:33 AM »
branch didnt get marked down for a torn lat vs a complete dex.  politics and someone hates dex.

i have no problem jay winning #4 vs a better phil but he needs to call it a day.  odds are kai doesnt f##k up with weight next yr, phil can put on another 5-7lbs and i'm sure vic has an idea he needs to bring his physique up to 2010 standards.

jay is a hard worker but he isnt a bber who should be a 6-time O like yates.  sorry.  

~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2010, 06:07:01 AM »
branch didnt get marked down for a torn lat vs a complete dex.  politics and someone hates dex.

i have no problem jay winning #4 vs a better phil but he needs to call it a day.  odds are kai doesnt f##k up with weight next yr, phil can put on another 5-7lbs and i'm sure vic has an idea he needs to bring his physique up to 2010 standards.

jay is a hard worker but he isnt a bber who should be a 6-time O like yates.  sorry.  


what does that even mean, they gave jay one freebie in 07


but probably 3 of yates 6 were freebies ..........and im a fan of dorian



mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2010, 06:42:32 AM »


as i said to another guy, lucky for us........competent judges who understand the criteria by which bodybuilding contests are judged were responsible for the results tonight



and not you, who didnt want jay to win cause the other guy looked "prettier" :-\

don't get it twisted I like jay I just think he looked better last year...
Bodybuilding is about size conditioning AND SHAPE  phil and dex had all 3 relativley speaking
if the jay of last yr showed up then yes he should have won... This yrs jay
no way
choice is an illusion

~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2010, 06:44:32 AM »
don't get it twisted I like jay I just think he looked better last year...
Bodybuilding is about size conditioning AND SHAPE  phil and dex had all 3 relativley speaking
if the jay of last yr showed up then yes he should have won... This yrs jay
no way


he was not 100% of what he was last year


but he wasnt that far off either


that compared with his sure size, thickness, width, and completeness pushed him over the edge




_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23833
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2010, 06:48:52 AM »
1. Rockel
2. Branch
3. Threeman
4. Rusty Jefferson(with Dave Henry on his shoulders)
5., 6., and so on... who cares.

Over 100 years class winner: MuscleCenter

.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2010, 09:16:59 AM »
I think he was a lot off from last yeah his upperbody looked flat...  Arms shrunk waiste wider back not as conditioned.
Like I said jay last year overwhelmed everyone   Not this year 
Phil now sports a better chest than jau more rounded delts
vastly superior arms and I do mean vastly.... And better balance and shape
simple
choice is an illusion

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2010, 10:14:56 AM »
rusty didnt compete

MB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2312
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2010, 11:53:24 AM »
Jay was way off from last year.  He was fidgety and nervous on stage and lacked the confidence he had last year.  This was probably the result of his dehydration problem on Friday.  Also, he was struggling with his right quad.  The imbalance is more noticeable than ever now.   

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41320
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2010, 12:13:32 PM »
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007





1.  Dexter = extremely flat and smaller than usual but shredded as fuck.  First place.....Hell no.
2.  Please provide pics of big waist.....Phil = Mr. Olympia....He was pretty much perfect...He no longer looks narrow....He's the real deal.
3.  Cutler was off by about 5%...Phil looks better then him from every angle except rear lat spread.
4.  Agreed about Branch....He's got everyone by the balls with this blue collar Texas Rattlesnake bullshit....Hard as fuck though Never a top 2 in a big show when the elites i.e. Jay, Phil, Kai compete.
5.  Wolf is better but he'll never be Mr. O
7

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2010, 12:49:53 PM »

1.  Dexter = extremely flat and smaller than usual but shredded as fuck.  First place.....Hell no.
2.  Please provide pics of big waist.....Phil = Mr. Olympia....He was pretty much perfect...He no longer looks narrow....He's the real deal.
3.  Cutler was off by about 5%...Phil looks better then him from every angle except rear lat spread.
4.  Agreed about Branch....He's got everyone by the balls with this blue collar Texas Rattlesnake bullshit....Hard as fuck though Never a top 2 in a big show when the elites i.e. Jay, Phil, Kai compete.
5.  Wolf is better but he'll never be Mr. O

I said phil waiste is BIGGER than what is was... Which is understandable as he has put on size

I think jay was a lot more off than 5% check his arms ... Looks quite a bit smaller than last yr
his waiste is wider

Dex was the most complete athlete on stage IMO crisp great muscle shape no missing bodyparts
waiste and abs amazing...

I had it between him a d Heath for the o
very dissapointing they just gave it to jay..... Just because he is big and conditioned and wider than Heath and dex if that's the case kovacs and mr I should be multiple mr o winners
choice is an illusion

flexfan

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3989
  • Venice Versmilitude
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2010, 02:03:55 PM »
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007




I agree with you. However, I'd go a step further- Dex, Heath, and Wolf all should have been ahead of Cutler. Oh well, par for the course at the O- usually very predictable because rep is usually more important than anything
Sultan

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2010, 02:19:42 PM »
I think Jay looked better on Saturday and he looked similar to last year, that being said, I prefer Phil's physique.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2010, 03:12:27 PM »
I think the judging needs to change how on earth can branch ever place in front of dexter...
That never should be
choice is an illusion

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2010, 03:13:40 PM »
1 dexter most complete athlete on stage

2 Heath most improved but waiste getting big.. Improved chest

3 culter - nowhere as good as last year nothing new smaller arms wider waiste very blocky the only positive is his condition was good should have never won though

4 branch - good condition... That's it horrible back tiny t Rex arms attached to a huge barrel torso should never in his wildest dreams beat dexter even if dex is 75% conditioned.

5 wolf good shape but his back let's him down. Looked miles better in 2007




i'd have rockel at 4 and branch at 5, but other than that i agree.
175lbs by 31st July

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #17 on: September 26, 2010, 04:45:39 PM »
Forgot about him yeah he looked good better than branch
but he will never get his dues
bb judging sucks
choice is an illusion

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19404
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #18 on: September 26, 2010, 04:56:15 PM »
The only placing that matters is first everything else sucks.

ThaRealist

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3393
  • Team REal LiFe
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #19 on: September 26, 2010, 05:04:55 PM »
Come on....The only placings that could have been swapped was Cutler and Phil and definitely Branch and Dexter...Dexter deserved 3rd solid, Jay and Phil could have been swapped places and I wouldn't have argued
You Can't Do It!!!

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #20 on: September 26, 2010, 05:05:32 PM »
This is how demented fan boys work:

-X, Y and Z should have been top 3.
-What about A, B and C?
-Oh yeah they too definately deserved to place in the top 3.

Doug_Steele

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10873
  • I'm totally Brolic, bro!
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #21 on: September 26, 2010, 05:08:33 PM »
This is how demented fan boys work:

-X, Y and Z should have been top 3.
-What about A, B and C?
-Oh yeah they too definately deserved to place in the top 3.

Where is Dorian at?  :D
D

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #22 on: September 26, 2010, 05:13:50 PM »
The contest was between Jay and Phil, and they both had very different types of physiques, each with their own flaws. Jay was the defending champ and wasn't off enough for Phil to knock him down. Nor did Phil outmuscle Jay. Also, Jay improved from Fri - Sat, while Phil went the other way, although not by that much.

Dex has been sharper and fuller, and is not really complete. He has poor calves and looked smaller than he's ever been, which is what cost him 3rd place over Branch, who had too much muscle and conditioning.

No way did Dex deserve the title this year, sorry mes.

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #23 on: September 26, 2010, 05:40:39 PM »
Where is Dorian at?  :D

Disqualified because of the barrel waist.  ;D

Doug_Steele

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10873
  • I'm totally Brolic, bro!
Re: 2010 Olympia - The mr o top 5 how it should have been
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2010, 05:44:01 PM »
Disqualified because of the barrel waist.  ;D

So, Ronnie won?  :D
D