Author Topic: Is this a diet myth: gradual fat loss over long period better than rapid in  (Read 2339 times)

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
short bursts and/or time?

 ???
I hate the State.

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Good to have you back

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
With fast weight loss comes inevitable muscle loss.

Do things in moderation and you can limit the loss I believe.

Butterbean

  • Special Guests
  • Getbig V
  • ******
  • Posts: 19324
With fast weight loss comes inevitable muscle loss.


And loose skin
R

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Yes it's better although not in a linear way. At a certain rate of weight loss (dependent on genetics, current body fat, etc.), the ratio of fat vs. muscle loss will start to get worse.

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Yes it's better although not in a linear way. At a certain rate of weight loss (dependent on genetics, current body fat, etc.), the ratio of fat vs. muscle loss will start to get worse.

I always read .5kg/1lbs a week is best...seems so little.
I hate the State.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
I always read .5kg/1lbs a week is best...seems so little.

IMO the best indicator of muscle loss is loss of strength. So as long as stength in the gym is OK, a greater rate of weight loss should be no problem.

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
IMO the best indicator of muscle loss is loss of strength. So as long as stength in the gym is OK, a greater rate of weight loss should be no problem.

In my experience that is a hard thing to measure unless over an extended period of time. I mean, with mean, I have super off days when I running on 2 hours of sleep or have pains in my back or whatever. I guess you would have to keep track over a long period of time. Also, I never try to set records when on a diet so it is also hard to tell for me.
I hate the State.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
In my experience that is a hard thing to measure unless over an extended period of time. I mean, with mean, I have super off days when I running on 2 hours of sleep or have pains in my back or whatever. I guess you would have to keep track over a long period of time. Also, I never try to set records when on a diet so it is also hard to tell for me.

The period is not that long. At least not as long as it would make any significant difference.

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23815
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
I've lost around 20 pounds so far and it took me around 4 months.
I improved on all of my lifts, though I have never been strong.
If a person is around it's maximum strength and muscle wise, it may be a very different situation.
.

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
I've lost around 20 pounds so far and it took me around 4 months.
I improved on all of my lifts, though I have never been strong.
If a person is around it's maximum strength and muscle wise, it may be a very different situation.

You are the Austrian Oak though...
I hate the State.

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
As long as protein requirements are met and you are inolved in a resistance program it doesn't matter how fast you lose.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
I've lost around 20 pounds so far and it took me around 4 months.
I improved on all of my lifts, though I have never been strong.
If a person is around it's maximum strength and muscle wise, it may be a very different situation.

it's amazing, isn't it?

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
As long as protein requirements are met and you are inolved in a resistance program it doesn't matter how fast you lose.

so this means you can do 2 hours of cardio a day?