Author Topic: Photos Show US Soldiers Posing With Afghan Corpses  (Read 811 times)

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Photos Show US Soldiers Posing With Afghan Corpses
« on: October 01, 2010, 08:30:19 PM »
When these guys return to america and complain about being treated poorly by doctors, hospitals, military I feel absolutely nothing for them because of things like this. Once again a Abu Graib is being carried out on the innocent

Photos show US soldiers posing with Afghan corpses
AP


FILE - In this undated file photo released by the U.S. Army, Cpl. Jeremy Morlock is shown. Morlock, 22, of Wasilla, Alaska, is among five Stryker sol AP – FILE - In this undated file photo released by the U.S. Army, Cpl. Jeremy Morlock is shown. Morlock, …

   
By GENE JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer Gene Johnson, Associated Press Writer – 2 hrs 9 mins ago

SEATTLE – Those who have seen the photos say they are grisly: soldiers beside newly killed bodies, decaying corpses and severed fingers.

The dozens of photos, described in interviews and in e-mails and military documents obtained by The Associated Press, were seized by Army investigators and are a crucial part of the case against five soldiers accused of killing three Afghan civilians earlier this year.

Troops allegedly shared the photos by e-mail and thumb drive like electronic trading cards. Now 60 to 70 of them are being kept tightly shielded from the public and even defense attorneys because of fears they could wind up in the news media and provoke anti-American violence.

"We're in a powder-keg situation here," said Eugene R. Fidell, president of the National Institute for Military Justice and a military law professor at Yale University.

Since the images are not classified, "I think they have to be released if they're going to be evidence in open court in a criminal prosecution," he said.

Maj. Kathleen Turner, a spokeswoman for Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Seattle, where the accused soldiers are stationed, acknowledged that the images were "highly sensitive, and that's why that protective order was put in place."

She declined to comment further.

At least some of the photos pertain to those killings. Others may have been of insurgents killed in battle, and some may have been taken as part of a military effort to document those killed, according to lawyers involved in the case.

Among the most gruesome allegations is that some of the soldiers kept fingers from the bodies of Afghans they killed as war trophies. The troops also are accused of passing around photos of the dead and of the fingers.

Four members of the unit — two of whom are also charged in the killings — have been accused of wrongfully possessing images of human casualties, and another is charged with trying to impede an investigation by having someone erase incriminating evidence from a computer hard drive.

"Everyone would share the photographs," one of the defendants, Cpl. Jeremy Morlock, told investigators. "They were of every guy we ever killed in Afghanistan."

After the first slaying, one service member sent urgent e-mails to his father warning that more bloodshed was on the way. The father told the AP he pleaded for help from the military, but authorities took no action. A spokesman said Friday that the Army was investigating.

The graphic nature of the images recalled famous photos that emerged in 2004 from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Those pictures — showing smiling soldiers posing with naked, tortured or dead detainees, sometimes giving a thumbs-up — stirred outrage against the United States at a critical juncture. The photos were a major embarrassment to the American military in an increasingly unpopular and bloody war.

In a chilling videotaped interview with investigators, Morlock talked about hurling a grenade at a civilian as a sergeant discussed the need to "wax this guy."

Morlock's attorney, Michael Waddington, said the photos were not just shared among the defendants or even their platoon. He cited witnesses who told him that many at Forward Operating Base Ramrod in Kandahar Province kept such images, including one photograph of someone holding up a decapitated head blown off in an explosion.

That photo had nothing to do with Morlock, he said. It's not clear whether it's among the photos seized in the case.

On Sept. 9, Army prosecutors gave a military representative of the defendants, Maj. Benjamin K. Grimes, packets containing more than 1,000 pages of documents in the case. Included were three photographs, each of a different soldier lifting the head of a dead Afghan, according to an e-mail Grimes sent to defense lawyers.

Later that day, before the documents could be shared with the defense lawyers, the prosecutors returned to Grimes' office and demanded to have the packets back, Grimes wrote, according to a copy of the e-mail first reported by The New York Times.

The prosecutors cited national security interests and a concern that the photos could be released to the media.

Grimes said his staff initially refused to return the photos, but the next day, the Army commander at Lewis-McChord who convened the criminal proceedings, Col. Barry Huggins, ordered them to do so. They complied.

At a preliminary hearing in Morlock's case Monday, Army officials confirmed that the number of restricted photos is 60 to 70. The investigating officer said he would view the photos in private.

Defense attorneys will also be allowed to see them if they visit the criminal investigations office on base, but they cannot have copies — an arrangement that did not satisfy Grimes. The defendants have been detained and cannot travel to see the photos to assist in their own defense, he noted, and most of the defense lawyers are based out of state.

Michael T. Corgan, a Vietnam veteran who teaches international relations at Boston University, said it should be no surprise that, even after Abu Ghraib, some soldiers take gruesome pictures as war souvenirs.

"They're proof people are as tough as they say they are," Corgan said. "War is the one lyric experience in their lives — by comparison every else is punching a time clock. They revel in it, and they collect memories of it."
C

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: Photos Show US Soldiers Posing With Afghan Corpses
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2010, 08:38:24 PM »
Red alert at Army base over Afghan corpse photos

Documents obtained by Salon show military brass in panic over release of grisly pictures in murder case

By Justin Elliott

Army officials in crisis mode over Afghan corpse photos
Salon

Earlier this month a dramatic standoff between Army officials and defense attorneys unfolded at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington state when officials invoking national security demanded that defense attorneys surrender CDs containing grisly pictures of U.S. soldiers posing with the corpses of Afghan civilians they allegedly killed.

At one point during the Sept. 9 episode, goverment officials were even posted outside the building of the main defense attorneys' office on the base to stop one attorney from leaving with the pictures, according to a memo written by the senior defense counsel at the base and obtained by Salon.

Five soldiers from the 5th Stryker Brigade have been charged with murder in the case, and some are alleged to have killed for fun -- and while high -- and then kept body parts of dead Afghan civilians as souvenirs.

The pictures in question show "three dead Afghans with three different Soldiers posing, holding up the decedent's head. (Each photo was one Afghan, one Soldier)," according to an e-mail by Benjamin Grimes, senior defense counsel at Base Lewis-McChord. Others showed what appeared to be severed fingers and a bone.

According to an e-mail and memo by Grimes describing the Sept. 9 incident, this is what happened:

Thirteen CDs holding over 1,000 pages of discovery -- including the photos -- were given to the defense attorneys' office at the base, which is called Trial Defense Service, to be distributed to lawyers for the accused soldiers. But after realizing that the photos were on the CDs, prosecutors in the case quickly returned to Trial Defense Service and demanded they be given back. Grimes writes:

    There followed an exchange of demands and refusals to return the photos. At one point, both the Chief of Justice, LTC Kevin Kercher, and the [Staff Judge Advocate], COL Walter Hudson, were in the [Trial Defense Service] office demanding return of the photos.

At one point during the standoff, "the Government had placed members of the Government outside of the [Trial Defense Service] office and had prevented" a lawyer who had one of the CDs from leaving the building. The government maintained this was a "misunderstanding."

One official told Grimes that "this 'was not a prosecution and defense thing,' meaning he did not believe the Government’s actions were procedural gamesmanship but rather reflected a belief that 'national security interests [were] at stake.'" The Army brass was concerned that lawyers for the soldiers would release the photos to the news media.

Ultimately, the photos were given back the next day, but only after they were ordered returned by Col. Barry Huggins, a commander at the base. (See the order here.) Defense attorneys believe the order to compel return of the photos was unlawful.

Access to the photos, even by defense attorneys, has now been strictly limited by the Army, though it's not clear that they can be kept from public release indefinitely.

Grimes, in an e-mail earlier this month to defense attorneys in the case, said he is "most concerned about two things: the Gov’t believes that it has the authority to retrieve already-provided discovery; and the Gov’t believes it has the authority ... to order Trial Defense Service counsel to do anything. I am sure you are concerned that this office is no longer a safe extension of your own places of business, but let me assure you that every member of this Trial Defense Service office is committed to ensuring all of your Severy benefit available under law, regulation, and ethical canon."

Grimes declined to comment for this story. A spokesperson for Base Lewis-McChord did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
C