Author Topic: Phil Heath narrow?  (Read 7010 times)

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Phil Heath narrow?
« on: October 02, 2010, 06:00:43 AM »
Looks as wide as Jay to me ???

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2010, 06:02:33 AM »
yes but jay is not so wide either. i think both gentlemen are not so much into delt work.

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2010, 06:04:09 AM »
synthol
tank u jesus

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2010, 06:06:13 AM »
yes but jay is not so wide either. i think both gentlemen are not so much into delt work.

Jay is the widest guy behind Ruhl. Much wider than Coleman ever was.


Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2010, 06:07:42 AM »
Lol cutler looks not near as big when slouched over his massive gut.

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2010, 06:14:28 AM »
They are both sitting down with their shoulders pushed in.

Phil is pretty narrow but the delt mass has evened it out a bit recently, he has very bad chest insertions and huge arms which make him look even more narrow than he would do otherwise.
Trans Milkshake.

MB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2312
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2010, 06:17:27 AM »
Jay = widest Mr. O ever

StanZoLOL

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2010, 06:18:21 AM »
yes but jay is not so wide either. i think both gentlemen are not so much into delt work.

Congrats! You're a fucking retard.  :)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83411
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2010, 06:18:52 AM »
Jay is the widest guy behind Ruhl. Much wider than Coleman ever was.


Wolf is about the widest

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83411
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2010, 06:20:29 AM »
Congrats! You're a fucking retard.  :)

The joke's on you  ;)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2010, 06:21:09 AM »
Wolf is wrecking Ronnie there.

where are all the 2010 Wolf pics?

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2010, 06:22:38 AM »
jay is one of the smaller big guys out there, he may need to change what he does for delts. maybe more presses?

MB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2312
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2010, 06:24:24 AM »
Surprisingly, Jay has a horrible most muscular pose, which is unusual for a guy with his width.  Most of the wide guys; Ruhl, Wolf, Dillett have great most musculars.

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2010, 06:25:01 AM »
Jay's width is what wins him the Olympia time after time. His structure, although blocky, is a one off. In the front relaxed everyone else looks years behind him.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83411
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #14 on: October 02, 2010, 06:26:03 AM »
Wolf is wrecking Ronnie there.

where are all the 2010 Wolf pics?
:o

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #15 on: October 02, 2010, 06:27:44 AM »
Wolf is wrecking Ronnie there.

where are all the 2010 Wolf pics?


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83411
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #16 on: October 02, 2010, 06:28:14 AM »
Jay's width is what wins him the Olympia time after time. His structure, although blocky, is a one off. In the front relaxed everyone else looks years behind him.

No Jay's size and conditioning at that size is what wins him the Olympia and when that conditioning was off his width & size couldn't save him , ask Dexter in 08

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #17 on: October 02, 2010, 06:28:38 AM »
Surprisingly, Jay has a horrible most muscular pose, which is unusual for a guy with his width.  Most of the wide guys; Ruhl, Wolf, Dillett have great most musculars.

This is totally true. If he hit it the way Ruhl hits it he'd look awesome, but he goes really wide with the arms so that his bis and tris dissappear.

G_Thang

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19757
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies!
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #18 on: October 02, 2010, 06:33:26 AM »
Wolf is wrecking Ronnie there.  ::)

where are all the 2010 Wolf pics?



At the end of his career.   

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2010, 06:35:56 AM »
Wolf should never ever ever finish behind someone with Jay's structure.
Trans Milkshake.

MB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2312
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2010, 06:38:55 AM »
Wolf beats just about everybody in a most muscular.  If only Wolf had Jay's work ethic. 

~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #21 on: October 02, 2010, 06:50:07 AM »
Looks as wide as Jay to me ???


what a stupid fucking post..........i question the intelligence of ANYONE who would take a photo of two bodybuilders hunched over sitting down, and use that to compare their physiques

especially when there are hundreds of stage photos available (which clearly show that YES, phil has very narrow clavicles)













look at this photo of them just standing next to each other............jay is literally twice as wide

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #22 on: October 02, 2010, 06:51:09 AM »

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #23 on: October 02, 2010, 07:06:31 AM »

look at this photo of them just standing next to each other............jay is literally twice as wide


He looks like one of those morphed pics that pop up sometimes. Like a cartoonishly huge guy who dwarfs the others.

~UN_$ung~

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 5248
  • Been real, been nice...but it hasnt been Real Nice
Re: Phil Heath narrow?
« Reply #24 on: October 02, 2010, 07:12:51 AM »
Jay is the widest guy behind Ruhl. Much wider than Coleman ever was.




what year, and show is this photo from.........jay looks real good there