Author Topic: Natty physiques  (Read 3087 times)

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Natty physiques
« on: October 05, 2010, 06:30:33 AM »
Who here actually has an interest in natty physiques. I mean it seems like most of the board are a bunch of fat schmoes that don't appreciate anyone that ain't on the gear or in perma bulk.

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2010, 06:33:09 AM »
no we are not gay

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2010, 06:35:24 AM »
no we are not gay
Do you work out are you in shape, does your own body digust you?

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2010, 06:38:32 AM »
far from ripped but also far from fat. just having an healthy man physique. no good genes for musclemass but hey im tall and looking bigger and better than most guys when im going out.

Swedish Viking

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1246
  • http://plunkan.blogspot.com/
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2010, 07:05:50 AM »
I have a growing interest in them anyway.  The only real potential for movement of this "sport" is in that direction.  Even more of the same isn't winning over the mainstream in any way.  On the other hand, times are changing and people are starting to respect what they perceive as quality a whole lot more over quantity.

JP_RC

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2010, 07:07:14 AM »
I don't care about natty physiques, unless its one of these:


BIG ACH

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8526
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2010, 07:10:36 AM »

I do! 

YngiweRhoads

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4267
  • Shreddin'
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2010, 07:10:55 AM »
As a 'sport', not unless participants can be verified as 100% lifetime natural with regards to performance enhancing drugs, and this is next to impossible.

As a lifestyle, most definitely.
6

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23818
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2010, 07:55:30 AM »
.

saucetradomous

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3000
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2010, 08:00:52 AM »
As a 'sport', not unless participants can be verified as 100% lifetime natural with regards to performance enhancing drugs, and this is next to impossible.

As a lifestyle, most definitely.

Good point, I only competed to say I had done it and I needed the extra motivation to get cut. For now I sit about 10-15lbs away from contest shape just living it up.

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2010, 09:08:15 AM »
Nattie bodybuilding is just a smaller weaker version of the pros. There is not as much to gain so there is less desire for G4P I assume.

I care about neither anymore.

I just like lifting weights and trying to be big and strong naturally whilst looking big and strong.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2010, 09:38:35 AM »
Nattie bodybuilding is just a smaller weaker version of the pros. There is not as much to gain so there is less desire for G4P I assume.

I care about neither anymore.

I just like lifting weights and trying to be big and strong naturally whilst looking big and strong.

key post goudy
choice is an illusion

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2010, 10:11:33 AM »

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2010, 10:22:36 AM »
Nattie bodybuilding is just a smaller weaker version of the pros. There is not as much to gain so there is less desire for G4P I assume.

I care about neither anymore.

I just like lifting weights and trying to be big and strong naturally whilst looking big and strong.
Meh the olympia should have a male fitness like the womens. Have heavy penaltys for being freakish. Use Steve reeves as the max thickness have weight inns and measuresment to ensure no extremes, no thongs just shorts. . Give the winner a years worth of magizine deals and shit. Sure it might be a little less guess than men in thongs, but throw on a few cuties, and it might be schmoe worthy.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2010, 10:27:25 AM »
Meh the olympia should have a male fitness like the womens. Have heavy penaltys for being freakish. Use Steve reeves as the max thickness have weight inns and measuresment to ensure no extremes, no thongs just shorts. . Give the winner a years worth of magizine deals and shit. Sure it might be a little less guess than men in thongs, but throw on a few cuties, and it might be schmoe worthy.

I think this event is already held in SF on a yearly basis, bro.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2010, 10:39:02 AM »
I think this event is already held in SF on a yearly basis, bro.
Sorry the schmoe is weak in me, I knew arnold had something like that. But I digress, must really work harder on my men in thongs.

slacker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5179
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2010, 10:41:44 AM »
I

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2010, 11:30:27 AM »
nice avatar homo

little bitch you are

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17466
  • MAGA
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2010, 11:36:20 AM »
hard to discuss natural bodybuilding because it's hard to know who is 100% natural and who is not.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #19 on: October 05, 2010, 11:39:38 AM »
hard to discuss natural bodybuilding because it's hard to know who is 100% natural and who is not.
Who cares, mass shouldnt matter, just keep the BMI's at non freak levels.

JP_RC

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #20 on: October 05, 2010, 11:42:00 AM »
What is "non-feak" levels for you? Example........

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2010, 11:44:47 AM »
What is "non-feak" levels for you? Example........
200 pounds max at 6 foot, subtract or add 7 pounds per inch. Thats still freakish by true natty levels so keep the winners about 20 pounds under that.

buffdnet

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 840
  • fuck the pope
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #22 on: October 05, 2010, 11:49:37 AM »
Meh the olympia should have a male fitness like the womens.
you should realize all bodybuilding comps are gay. end of discussion.

JP_RC

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #23 on: October 05, 2010, 12:14:17 PM »
200 lbs at 6 feet tall would be too skinny for a bodybuilder.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Natty physiques
« Reply #24 on: October 05, 2010, 04:50:20 PM »
200 lbs at 6 feet tall would be too skinny for a bodybuilder.
Yeah right dude. Even arnie wasn't much over 200 in pumping iron. When your at their kind of bf there lite.