even if we consider his back a bad part (it's not) still the rear doesnt mean the back only to say he was only a front bb!!.. he had one of the greatest calves and hams and the rear of his shoulders and arms were 2nd to none!!..
levrone for example had better back details than nasser but did he have better calves, hams, rear shoulders, arms??... nooooooooo...
His back is bad , his back is horrible you can't escape that and neither could he , his back was a huge ( no pun ) flaw and cost him the Olympia , his back was wide and that's it , it had no separation , no detail , no thickness , no depth , and no hardness
anyone who says his back wasn't a ' bad part ' needs to learn a lot about bodybuilding