Author Topic: Christine O'Donnell Tells GOPers: 'I've Got Sean Hannity In My Back Pocket'  (Read 1828 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
WASHINGTON -- Christine O'Donnell may not be a witch, but she knows how to use scare tactics to raise money, top Republican strategists and officials here tell me.

They say the Delaware Republican is loudly complaining about how they won't support her -- and they are not -- as a way to generate angry, send-them-a-message donations from her Tea Party base.

Specifically, according to two top GOP insiders, she said at a strategy meeting with DC types last week: "I've got Sean Hannity in my back pocket, and I can go on his show and raise money by attacking you guys."

And that was precisely what she was doing on the radio today. On Hannity's popular afternoon drive-time show, the Tea Party-inspired Senate contender acidly criticized the party, specifically the National Republican Senatorial Committee, for not funneling any serious cash (beyond a pro forma $43,000) into her race against Democrat Chris Coons.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
She is correct - the disgusting RINO NRSC are only really helping out the rinos and beltway favs who will go along with their big govt agenda.   

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
She is correct - the disgusting RINO NRSC are only really helping out the rinos and beltway favs who will go along with their big govt agenda.   

But isn't hannity fair and balanced?

being 'in her pocket' implies what, exactly?  ;)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
But isn't hannity fair and balanced?

being 'in her pocket' implies what, exactly?  ;)

It means hannity is softball - everyone knows that. 

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
But isn't hannity fair and balanced?

being 'in her pocket' implies what, exactly?  ;)

Ummmm,Hannity comes right out and admits that he is a Reagan conservative and a commentator.I will wait by my TV as to when Shultz ,Mathews Olberman and Maddow admit their incredible bias and admit their shows arent news but they are just shills for liberals.

Purge_WTF

  • Guest
  Independent Conservatives like Christine, Rand Paul and others who didn't necessarilly pledge their allegiance to the GOP were mocked and shunned by Fux News just a few years ago. Now that the Tea Party has invoked the concept of throwing the bums onboth sides of the aisle out, Pawn Hannity and the lawyer with a dead dog are all but happy to jump the bandwagon. It's best summed up by a paragraph from an article I posted not too long ago:
 
  Today, the popular Tea Party movement represents the first sign of conservative sanity in some time, due to their possible willingness to be independent of the Republican Party, something GOP politicians and their talk radio spokesman already fear. Reviewing Sean Hannity’s new book Conservative Victory, the City Paper’s Chris Haire writes, “Hannity has nothing but disdain for the Tea Party’s No. 1 goal: to vote all the bums out, Democrat and Republican alike. Hannity wants to keep those bums in power, as long as they’re members of the GOP and their last name isn’t Paul.”




Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
O'Donnell To GOP'ers: I've Got Sean Hannity In My Back Pocket
« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2010, 08:40:51 AM »
Fair and Balanced!   ::)

WASHINGTON -- Christine O'Donnell may not be a witch, but she knows how to use scare tactics to raise money, top Republican strategists and officials here tell me.

They say the Delaware Republican is loudly complaining about how they won't support her -- and they are not -- as a way to generate angry, send-them-a-message donations from her Tea Party base.

Specifically, according to two top GOP insiders, she said at a strategy meeting with DC types last week: "I've got Sean Hannity in my back pocket, and I can go on his show and raise money by attacking you guys."

And that was precisely what she was doing on the radio today. On Hannity's popular afternoon drive-time show, the Tea Party-inspired Senate contender acidly criticized the party, specifically the National Republican Senatorial Committee, for not funneling any serious cash (beyond a pro forma $43,000) into her race against Democrat Chris Coons.

(The O'Donnell campaign did not respond to a request for comment.)

Hannity, who earlier in the show warned GOP officials not to criticize Tea Party leader Sen. Jim DeMint, expressed sympathy with O'Donnell's fiscal plight and gave a glowing review of her performance in last night's televised debate with Coons. Hannity criticized party insiders for not backing her with cash or endorsements.

It's not just the official party that is staying away. O'Donnell -- who trails by 19 points in the latest polls -- isn't getting support from independent-spending groups such as Karl Rove's American Crossroads. Hannity's rave review notwithstanding, Rove has not changed his mind about her or her chances.

The national party hasn't ignored her altogether. Officials sent advisers to Delaware, and her media consultants are well regarded -- at least they were before they launched her ad campaign with the now-infamous and much-lampooned "I am not a witch" spot.

Party insiders shake their heads at the O'Donnell woe-is-me campaign strategy. "Why would you tell the world that no one in the party likes you?" asked one.

But the answer is: the strategy is a way of making the best out of a bad situation -- and it seems to be working, to some extent, on the financial end. "Within a week of winning the primary, she raised 10 times the amount of cash that Coons had on hand," one party official marveled.

If she can raise enough money by attacking the Bigs with Hannity's help, perhaps she can close the gap in the polls -- and then the DC folks will fork over. Nobody here thinks that this scenario is realistic, but nobody here thought she'd get this far. We'll know -- appropriately enough -- by Halloween  .
!

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: O'Donnell To GOP'ers: I've Got Sean Hannity In My Back Pocket
« Reply #7 on: October 16, 2010, 09:56:29 AM »
haha IMAGINE if Obama told dems at a fundraiser "don't worry yall, I got Olbermann in my pocket!"

hahaha oh shit, we'd never hear the end of it.

Instead, since you admit vandersloot/madoff 2012 would be acceptable, your standards for candidates are so shit poor that you find gaffes like this to be endearing.  It seems moderate voters don't share this sentiment.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: O'Donnell To GOP'ers: I've Got Sean Hannity In My Back Pocket
« Reply #8 on: October 16, 2010, 10:00:23 AM »
haha IMAGINE if Obama told dems at a fundraiser "don't worry yall, I got Olbermann in my pocket!"

hahaha oh shit, we'd never hear the end of it.

Instead, since you admit vandersloot/madoff 2012 would be acceptable, your standards for candidates are so shit poor that you find gaffes like this to be endearing.  It seems moderate voters don't share this sentiment.

He already did fool. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
He already did fool. 

link to his exact quote?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
link to his exact quote?

Gibbs said that people should go to MSNBC over other networks and watch olbermann and madow to get news.  I guess you forgot that one.   

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Gibbs said that people should go to MSNBC over other networks and watch olbermann and madow to get news.  I guess you forgot that one.   

oh, you interpreted a gates recommendation as an insinuation of how obama feels about one particular announcer?

not quite the same as "I have this mofo in my pocket, bitches!"

I can't WAIT to hear Hannity's response lol...

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Gibbs said that people should go to MSNBC over other networks and watch olbermann and madow to get news.  I guess you forgot that one.   

Recall that Obama called Fox News "destructive," while his Administration said Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow of MSNBC are "invaluable."

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
oh, you interpreted a gates recommendation as an insinuation of how obama feels about one particular announcer?

not quite the same as "I have this mofo in my pocket, bitches!"

I can't WAIT to hear Hannity's response lol...

Remember that speech he gave in front of the press club saying "we all know most of you voted for me"  ? ? ? 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Remember that speech he gave in front of the press club saying "we all know most of you voted for me"  ? ? ? 


his joke is still not the same as "I got you in my pocket, beyotch!"

I bet Hannity gets off the ODonnell bandwagon monday AM

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
I watched the entire debate this weekend.She DESTROYED that filthy lib!!Absolutely destroyed him!!!The guy is a joke.Wrong on every single issue,but the ignorant stupid libs,dont care about issues,they care about her views on evolution.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
I watched the entire debate this weekend.She DESTROYED that filthy lib!!Absolutely destroyed him!!!The guy is a joke.Wrong on every single issue,but the ignorant stupid libs,dont care about issues,they care about her views on evolution.

Again - its very fucking simple to all but the mentally challenged. 

Coons = 100% chance of voting for tax hikes, obamacare, cap & trade, etc etc. 

O'Donnell = 50% chance she will screw up.


With those odds, I don't see how anyone votes for Coons unless they want more taxes, spending, cap & trade, obamacare, etc.   

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Again - its very fucking simple to all but the mentally challenged. 

Coons = 100% chance of voting for tax hikes, obamacare, cap & trade, etc etc. 

O'Donnell = 50% chance she will screw up.


With those odds, I don't see how anyone votes for Coons unless they want more taxes, spending, cap & trade, obamacare, etc.   

What is funny to me is these idiots like Blacken get on here and try to point out how dumb she is,then will put on videos of that nut job half wit Grayson in Florida and act like he is smart.The guy is a borderline retard[who is going to be unemployed in two weeks]but libs like Blacken and that simpleton Ed Shultz thinks he is smart.

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way


Coons = 100% chance of voting for tax hikes, obamacare, cap & trade, etc etc. 

O'Donnell = 50% chance she will screw up.


As noted earlier, federal taxes are very considerably lower by every measure since Obama became president. And given the economic circumstances, it’s hard to imagine that a tax increase would have been enacted last year. In fact, 40% of Obama’s stimulus package involved tax cuts. These include the Making Work Pay Credit, which reduces federal taxes for all taxpayers with incomes below $75,000 by between $400 and $800.

http://coloradoindependent.com/50655/forbes-tea-partiers-confused-taxes-%E2%80%98lower-by-every-measure%E2%80%99-under-obama

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
As noted earlier, federal taxes are very considerably lower by every measure since Obama became president. And given the economic circumstances, it’s hard to imagine that a tax increase would have been enacted last year. In fact, 40% of Obama’s stimulus package involved tax cuts. These include the Making Work Pay Credit, which reduces federal taxes for all taxpayers with incomes below $75,000 by between $400 and $800.

http://coloradoindependent.com/50655/forbes-tea-partiers-confused-taxes-%E2%80%98lower-by-every-measure%E2%80%99-under-obama


 ::)  ::)

A tax cut is not the same as a tax credit - geez dude - WTF - you are getting like 240.    a tax CUT is when your rate goes down, not a one time gimmick of $8 a week. 

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
::)  ::)

A tax cut is not the same as a tax credit - geez dude - WTF - you are getting like 240.    a tax CUT is when your rate goes down, not a one time gimmick of $8 a week. 

So did taxes go up under Obama for those making less than $250k?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
So did taxes go up under Obama for those making less than $250k?

Yes, but it is too complicated for you to understand or acknowledge. 

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Yes, but it is too complicated for you to understand or acknowledge. 

Fam...you know me by now..that by far is the heaviest steaming pile of horse shit i have ever read on Getbig...thats is the hugest cop out in the history of getbig..you just lost hella cool points...wow...just wow.....

I mean..fuck...do your cut and paste thing or something...fuck...i cant believe you just pulled this crock of shit..

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Forbes: Tea partiers confused, taxes ‘lower by every measure’ under Obama
  By John Tomasic 4/15/10 10:14 AM
Bruce Bartlett, a fiscal conservative and columnist for Forbes who worked in the George W Bush and Reagan administrations is shocked by what he sees happening on the right these days. He became a conservative, he says, because he saw liberalism as driven by lofty unachievable or unreal motives whereas conservativism he believed was pegged primarily to concern with consequences and so based on cold hard reality. He reports that the Tea Parties have turned the world around. Tea Partiers yelling about taxes are delusional, he writes. They know nothing about taxes.

Bartlett was executive director of the Joint Economic Committee of Congress and Deputy Assistant Secretary for economic policy at the U.S. Treasury Department. In March he wrote: “Federal taxes are very considerably lower by every measure since Obama became president…. and last year’s stimulus bill, enacted with no Republican support, reduced federal taxes by almost $100 billion in 2009 and another $222 billion this year.”


Bartlett’s column, which reportedly drew a lot of complaints on the right, is a gem worth quoting at length.


[N]o matter how one slices the data, the tea party crowd appear to believe that federal taxes are very considerably higher than they actually are, whether referring to total taxes as a share of GDP or in terms of the taxes paid by a typical family.

Tea party goers also seem to have a very distorted view of the direction of federal taxes. They were asked whether they are higher, lower or the same as when Barack Obama was inaugurated last year. More than two-thirds thought that taxes are higher today and only 4% thought they were lower; the rest said they are the same.

As noted earlier, federal taxes are very considerably lower by every measure since Obama became president. And given the economic circumstances, it’s hard to imagine that a tax increase would have been enacted last year. In fact, 40% of Obama’s stimulus package involved tax cuts. These include the Making Work Pay Credit, which reduces federal taxes for all taxpayers with incomes below $75,000 by between $400 and $800.

According to the JCT, last year’s $787 billion stimulus bill, enacted with no Republican support, reduced federal taxes by almost $100 billion in 2009 and another $222 billion this year. The Tax Policy Center, a private research group, estimates that close to 90% of all taxpayers got a tax cut last year and almost 100% of those in the $50,000 income range. For those making between $40,000 and $50,000, the average tax cut was $472; for those making between $50,000 and $75,000, the tax cut averaged $522. No taxpayer anywhere in the country had his or her taxes increased as a consequence of Obama’s policies.

It’s hard to explain this divergence between perception and reality. Perhaps these people haven’t calculated their tax returns for 2009 yet and simply don’t know what they owe. Or perhaps they just assume that because a Democrat is president that taxes must have gone up, because that’s what Republicans say that Democrats always do. In fact, there hasn’t been a federal tax increase of any significance in this country since 1993.

That was from his column. He added this introduction after readers complained about it, a kind of “this is where I’m coming from” for the people who believed he was out to smear the Tea Party.

One of the reasons I became a conservative way back when is because conservatives lived in a world where one’s actions are defined by their consequences, not one’s motives. Conservatives also prided themselves on being reality-based and fact-based in their analyses, while liberals often seemed to live in a dream world disconnected from history, institutions and ideology, among other things.

Today, however, conservatives have largely adopted the liberal operating assumption and now also define themselves by the righteousness of their motives. This fact became very obvious to me this week when I examined the knowledge that tea party demonstrators on Capitol Hill had on the subject of taxation. As I recount in my column below, most of those in the crowd grossly overestimated the level and burden of federal taxes, thinking that they are many times higher than they actually are.

New polling suggests most Americans think the amount of taxes they pay is fair. They’re concerned about jobs.

A new New York Times/CBS News poll reports that 62 percent of Americans think the amount of income tax they paid this year was fair. Less than 30 percent think the amount they are paying is unfair. Even among the Tea Party, more than half think they paid a fair amount of taxes. It’s the high active members who are on the non-reality fringe.

Yet while some say the Tea Party stands for “Taxed Enough Already,” most Tea Party supporters – 52 percent – say their taxes are fair, the poll shows. Just under one in five Americans say they support the Tea Party movement.

However, those most active in the Tea Party are less satisfied with the amount of income taxes they will pay. Fifty-five percent of Tea Party activists – those who have attended a rally or donated money – (about 4 percent of Americans overall) say their income taxes are unfair.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Fam...you know me by now..that by far is the heaviest steaming pile of horse shit i have ever read on Getbig...thats is the hugest cop out in the history of getbig..you just lost hella cool points...wow...just wow.....

I mean..fuck...do your cut and paste thing or something...fuck...i cant believe you just pulled this crock of shit..

Obama has not directly taxed people in the form of income tax hikes, but that does not tell the entire story as the direct impact of his policies make everyone poorer and with less disposable income.  

This has occurred with americans now having a higher premiuim for health care due to Obamacare, the state taxes going up to cover the medicaid mandates on the states to fund ObamaCare, etc etc.  That is just ObamaCare alone.  The tanning tax, cigarette tax, hit people who make less than 250k a year.    

Now - with his money printing scam with Helicopter Ben - go read my Inflation Thread.  Obama is literally stealing your money with a smile and the idiots with ZERO economic understanding are clueless as to how this occurs.  Inflation is a hidden tax no different than a direct tax hike.  The inflation is coming because the Fed Reserve has to print so much money to cover the costs of Obama's spenduing he refuses curtail.  The net effect is a devaluation of the dollar and loss of purchasing power - which is the same as a tax, just that Obama does not have the balls to tell so.  

Have you seen gas prices lately?  Guess why gas is skyrocketing?  Inflation, loss of dollar power, Obama's horrible drilling policies in the gulf, etc etc.  The net effect again is to make people poorer and have less money in their pockets.  

Obama is also flirting with a VAT tax, cap & trade taxes, etc etc.

Finally - the refusal to extend the Bush tax cuts will act as a tax hike as well.    

You see Mal - Obama's little shit show works on low information voters who buy into idiotic nonsense made for 4th grade level voters, but not those who know about economics.