Some people are just so fucking out there it is troubling.
How is this book any less credible than the libel "roots of obama's rage" rubbish. I don't like the guy but even i know that book was libel bullh*t. this is just the other way, but still how is it any less credible than the forbes rubbish? Both are opinion and conjecture more than substance.
Libel?Did yiou read it? The book has more foot notes, referneces and sources than almost any book I have read in memory. Neatly every sentenced is sourced in Denieshs' book.
Sourced from what exactly? This man is claiming what is un-claimable - to know the inner most thoughts and motivations of someone. That right there should tell you all you need to know. Unless it comes from Obama's mouth it's conjecture and from the looks of that book bordering on libel.
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Harvard Historian: Obama is a "Philosopher President" Comparable to the Founding FathersYou Tube ^ | 10/29/10 | RobtKraft/GrannyJan Posted on Friday, October 29, 2010 12:55:55 PM by vrwc54Drinking too much Kool-aid at Harvard?(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I bumped the thread - go look at it. Dinesh uses Obama's own words.
it's called context. What you read and interpret is different than someone else, as is the context of what things are said.
I wonder how long until the spin machine decrees that the latest "Oh Shit" statement by the POTUS is yet another in a long line of "teachable moments"
Like what? Again - Dinesh used obamas books, speeches, statements, etc to make his arguments, nothing else.
Look you'll never see it even if it's staring you in the face. You'll always be blinded by some crazy bias. I've said my piece and i stand by it 110%.
He's filled with something, but not philosophy....
If we don't take the words and actions of individuals as being their truth then what are we supposed to hang on to in order to understand their truth?
