ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER at the 1970 Mr. World [Rare Footage]

[Pollux]

1.  What's with the gay ass hip swivel?
2.  He walks like a homo.

Watch yo mouth, colored boy! 

[GoneAway]

Great clip! But that's all the footage available? 

No, there's more.

[MuscleMcMannus]

1.  What's with the gay ass hip swivel?
2.  He walks like a homo.

That's what I said. 

[Jaime]

First, I have not competed in over thirty years and the only magazine I have bought in at least ten years has been the
recent Robert Kennedy issue called "Legends".  Why? Because I have zero desire to look at what amounts to over doped
queer bait in dental floss thongs, humping to cRap "music" to the thunderous applause of a herd of
testosterone deficient size queens.  Arnold, Reeves, Draper, Park, et al, did not "dance" to anything. 
Instead they moved gracefully from pose to pose with a dignity that will forever elude the gay billboards of today's posing dais.

If you took the time to look at most of the truly great physique champions routines, they displayed their physiques with dignity
and quite often grace.  Style.  The Oak for one never appeared as though he were some wayward gay clown (e.g., Kai Greene). 
His facial expression was always one of calm supremacy, not like he was constipated vis a vie Ronnie Coleslaw taking a dump and disguising it as a "most muscular" pose.

Quite often these men would pay homage to Greek, Roman or Renaissance statuary.  Poses depicting the Farnese Hercules or Michelangelo's David come immediately to mind.  Compare their presentations to retards like the aforementioned Kai Greene or others of his kind and you will surely see the folly of your words.  There is nothing queer about presenting your physique in a classical and tasteful manner such as what the Oak did.

The display of a genuinely masculine physique, done absent of homoerotic undertones can be a work of art.  For proof I encourage you to look to the aforementioned statuary and not the bloated, crappy, comic book inspired pieces of shit like those in today's magazines nor in that faggy homo comic book crap that BayGm recently put up here in one of the threads.  Disgusting does not begin to describe such filth. 

It is as base as can be and reflects the state of mind amongst those that think with their genitals instead of being inspired by their hearts, minds and yes, perhaps their souls.

As to whether or not the bodybuilders of the 70s could have achieved the level of "conditioning" so prevalent among todays bodydopers,
I would say I suppose so, but no one I have ever known desired to look like a zit covered anatomy chart. Look, I'm not here to do anything other than state my thoughts on what was and what is now and the difference between what is right and wrong in bodybuilding.  Some will agree with me and some will not.  I tend to think I am correct.   Because I am.  Take care.

Best post ever.

[growth]

No, there's more.

OK, how about Sergio and Draper?

[Pollux]

No, there's more.

Then I look forward to seeing it! 

[JP_RC]

Yes. The Mr. World took place about a week before the Mr. Olympia.

thanks

[hipolito mejia]

1.  What's with the gay ass hip swivel?

That was 40 years ago !
give the guy a break.

[Jake_W]

                                                                                              .

[axestream]

could those guys have gotten in better condition if they wanted to?  like could you have gotten shreaded glutes back then ?

or is that more of a thing that came along with HGH and the more extreme drug cycles?

or was it ALWAYS possible to get shreaded glutes, but the judging criteria didnt call for such extreme condition back then?

I've seen guys with ripped glutes who didn't use anything they didn't have access to back then. Most of them were on relatively low dosages though.

I'd say that it's actually due to the size requirements for the pro's that it's practically impossible for them to be shredded without going to the extreme. It's hard to be that heavy, shredded, but also have full muscles.

[flinstones1]

I think Arnold had the sickest response to dbol in the history of bodybuilding. amazing  how fast his body would change from lanky 200 pounds in the offseason.

[Alex23]

First, I have not competed in over thirty years and the only magazine I have bought in at least ten years has been the
recent Robert Kennedy issue called "Legends".  Why? Because I have zero desire to look at what amounts to over doped
queer bait in dental floss thongs, humping to cRap "music" to the thunderous applause of a herd of
testosterone deficient size queens.  Arnold, Reeves, Draper, Park, et al, did not "dance" to anything. 
Instead they moved gracefully from pose to pose with a dignity that will forever elude the gay billboards of today's posing dais.

If you took the time to look at most of the truly great physique champions routines, they displayed their physiques with dignity
and quite often grace.  Style.  The Oak for one never appeared as though he were some wayward gay clown (e.g., Kai Greene). 
His facial expression was always one of calm supremacy, not like he was constipated vis a vie Ronnie Coleslaw taking a dump and disguising it as a "most muscular" pose.

Quite often these men would pay homage to Greek, Roman or Renaissance statuary.  Poses depicting the Farnese Hercules or Michelangelo's David come immediately to mind.  Compare their presentations to retards like the aforementioned Kai Greene or others of his kind and you will surely see the folly of your words.  There is nothing queer about presenting your physique in a classical and tasteful manner such as what the Oak did.

The display of a genuinely masculine physique, done absent of homoerotic undertones can be a work of art.  For proof I encourage you to look to the aforementioned statuary and not the bloated, crappy, comic book inspired pieces of shit like those in today's magazines nor in that faggy homo comic book crap that BayGm recently put up here in one of the threads.  Disgusting does not begin to describe such filth. 

It is as base as can be and reflects the state of mind amongst those that think with their genitals instead of being inspired by their hearts, minds and yes, perhaps their souls.

As to whether or not the bodybuilders of the 70s could have achieved the level of "conditioning" so prevalent among todays bodydopers,
I would say I suppose so, but no one I have ever known desired to look like a zit covered anatomy chart. Look, I'm not here to do anything other than state my thoughts on what was and what is now and the difference between what is right and wrong in bodybuilding.  Some will agree with me and some will not.  I tend to think I am correct.   Because I am.  Take care.

Hi Arnold.

[MuscleMcMannus]

                                                                                              .

LMAO what a small dick Arnold had.