I've thought about this a while back when Viagra first came out for ED it was meant primarily for those who not just had ED, but who were out of shape and their target group--older men...just look at the commercials they ran. And the jokes that came up. Also, you started seeing a lot of older men with younger women...that Vee-igra worked wonders
Now, look at AAS, sure there are side effects (as with Viagra), but the ones who outlawed it were older men (our Legislature), most who take it are younger men...
I argue that both are performance enhancers-- one enhances sexual performance, the other "physical stamina" and muscular performance. And now, more older men are on HRT, AAS and everything else, yet younger men are sneered at for taking them, vilified. Put in the papers, stripped of records...yet it's the older men that are behind it...yes, there are a lot of younger men who take Viagra/Cialis for that extra long performance---but the people who are targeted in commercials by the drug companies are not them.
The question is this ageism? Older men wanting to control younger men, but yet want to "keep it up" like they were when they younger. In a sense a CB/Hater attempt by older men against younger men?
Or is this a natural reflection of older males (non-virile) feeling threatened by younger males and their virility and youth, so using methods available to them to "control" them, yet trying to maintain and or seek the virility that they lost?
It's crap,
I'm 22, I train hard, am ripped and I can't hold a rock hard erection. The whole environment is against male virility, food chemicals, water chemicals, stressfull everyday life in general- I should just forget everything and just enjoy the pussy
This is part of the masonic rite to make people weaker... they control human population also by battling against male virility.... why do you think america was so strong for the water fluoridation with many other absurd designs,
