Author Topic: Big Dan Hill on Ironman's cover  (Read 6275 times)

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14166
Re: Big Dan Hill on Ironman's cover
« Reply #25 on: November 11, 2010, 10:57:59 AM »
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=201448.0

You had to post up the only picture of Pelletier where he looked like a deranged, old man stricken by senile dementia who just happened to stumble onto a bodybuilding stage with nothing but his underwear on?

I mean, come on!  Could you have not picked a better picture?

"1"

Cableguy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1722
  • Cableguy no longer...
Re: Big Dan Hill on Ironman's cover
« Reply #26 on: November 11, 2010, 11:40:24 AM »
Actually, he looked pretty fucking great. Ideal physique actually...

I did.  :)

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Big Dan Hill on Ironman's cover
« Reply #27 on: November 11, 2010, 12:37:54 PM »
Small ars for that torso
choice is an illusion

dave19

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 796
Re: Big Dan Hill on Ironman's cover
« Reply #28 on: November 12, 2010, 02:50:07 AM »
I wonder when "Big" Daniel Hill will finally realize that he was never meant to be a pro bodybuilder.

Seems like he does not have any true friends because obviously no one is telling him that he does not look impressive at all.

Dorian01

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1264
  • Coach loves the sticky studs
Re: Big Dan Hill on Ironman's cover
« Reply #29 on: November 12, 2010, 03:35:23 AM »
They forgot to photoshop his arms huge

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Big Dan Hill on Ironman's cover
« Reply #30 on: November 12, 2010, 04:04:25 AM »
How come when Flex did a split it looked awesome, but when "Big" Dan Hill does one, it looks awkwardly gay?