Author Topic: Would you support profiling if it got the scanners removed?  (Read 4431 times)

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Would you support profiling if it got the scanners removed?
« Reply #50 on: November 24, 2010, 12:07:00 PM »
George laying a verbal/cerebral beatdown that sums up everything nicely, as usual.  Brilliant post.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Would you support profiling if it got the scanners removed?
« Reply #51 on: November 24, 2010, 12:10:50 PM »
GW always makes the best posts. 

Again - can we show a recent example of a white, black, hispanic, or asian (japanese, chinese, etc) person seeking to blow up a plance? 

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Would you support profiling if it got the scanners removed?
« Reply #52 on: November 24, 2010, 12:17:53 PM »
That's a whole lot of rambling for someone with no argument. You are, after all, the same person who tried to argue that environmental terrorists who vandalize buildings are worse than Muslims that kill other people. Or do you not remember the bitch slapping I gave you when you tried to throw those FBI statistics around a few weeks ago? You know, the one where you referenced terrorist attacks in 2002 and then ignored the fact that just the Bali bombings (carried out by Muslims) alone killed 100x the number of people in all the non-Muslim terrorist attacks combined?  ::)

Fact of the matter is that, much like kcballer, you are utterly clueless on this topic and base your entire argument around cries of bigotry and intolerance. You don't actually have any evidence or facts to stand on. And given your quip about Al Qaeda, you might actually be stupider than I perceive you to be. That's saying a lot because my expectations of you are already pretty low.

I never argued such nonsense.  If you want to discuss facts instead of the bullshit you are spewing, lets discuss facts. In that thread we were discussing terrorist attacks on US soil, what would FBI data have to do with international terrorist activities?  Absolutely jack shit.  You are obviously too dense to realize that, but I'll point it out for you, again.

If you actually think Al Qaeda is some sort of world wide organized network of terrorists then you are clearly about as smart as a rolling band of bricks.  Try educating yourself for once.

MB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2312
Re: Would you support profiling if it got the scanners removed?
« Reply #53 on: November 24, 2010, 12:19:03 PM »
Yes, John Walker Lindh closely resembles the typical American—with the beard and head gear and multiple stamps on his passport to Pakistan. ::)

Two things- and I mean this from the bottom of my heart, half of you fucking morons should be sterilized as a necessary step to preserve the sanity of the human race.
I mean the responses in this thread are on par with a monkey who closes his eyes while repeatedly shaking a tree and getting whacked in the head with falling coconuts. Why not open your fucking eyes and climb the tree, instead of closing your eyes and praying for the best?  At the risk of offending dickless liberal sissys and Islamic terrorists we are going to close our eyes to the possibility of profiling .01% of the individuals at the airport while aggressively, intrusively and ineffectively humiliating the rest of the population every time they travel by air?
The rest of you have the moral equivalency stick shoved so far up your ass that it’s coming out of your eye sockets.  The “ Tim McVeigh, Al Qaeda might use white people one day, next time this next time that”  bullshit responses you idiots keep parroting is cringe worthy on a board filled with a multitude of stupid people with stupid opinions. Has anyone noticed that these fantasy’s about “next time” never come, and that in the interim the “this times” have been happening with regularity over and over and over again for half a century? How many more “this times” will it take for you fuckwads to realize that there is a very specific group of people, who tend to travel to and from a very specific part of the world, who follow a particular religion and are 1000000000x more likely to blow up an airplane than anyone else?
Instead of feeling up grandma and strip searching toddlers, why doesn’t the 24 year old Middle Eastern male who is in the country on a visitors visa and has traveled to Pakistan, Afghanistan and Lebanon in the past 8 months get a few extra questions thrown his way? I understand that common sense and intelligence isn’t a strong suit around here, but what do you think is a greater deterrent to potential terrorists? Feeling up grandma, or asking Ahmed about his visit>?


Nothing else to say.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Would you support profiling if it got the scanners removed?
« Reply #54 on: November 24, 2010, 12:24:29 PM »
I never argued such nonsense.  If you want to discuss facts instead of the bullshit you are spewing, lets discuss facts. In that thread we were discussing terrorist attacks on US soil, what would FBI data have to do with international terrorist activities?  Absolutely jack shit.  You are obviously too dense to realize that, but I'll point it out for you, again.


Nice meltdown. Unfortunately, it was your link that referenced the Bali bombings, not me. Go cry to the FBI for ruining the idiotic argument you tried to make.

Feel free to read that thread if you want to see how you were embarrassed again.