so the logic is, soy is bad, so it's just fine to modify it to produce insecticides and then feed it to people anyway?
What? You mean they have modified soy to make insecticides? I am not aware of this, but just because something is toxic to an insect it doesen't mean it is toxic to mammals. But you are right. Some insecticides, like organophosphates, are toxic to both insects and mammals. But lots of plants already produce natural insectices anyway. For instance, tomatoes produce nicotine to kill insects that prey on it, and Humans eat tomatoes. The amount of nicotine is very small and kills the insects that feed on it, but is almost harmless to a Human. Coffee produces caffeine as a drug to paralize insects and caffeine has many psychotropic benefits to Humans. In the case of soy, though, you shouldn't be eating it anyway. Regular soy is already bad enough for you. But I agree with you that if they are modifying harmless plants to produce insecticides and those insecticides are proven to be bad for Humans, then you shouldn't eat it. But will it cause genetic mutations to the people eating them? No. Genetic engineering of plants can be very good. For instance, genetically engineered vines can produce hundreds of times more resvaratrol, which is highly antioxidant and beneficial to the cardiovascular system. Genetic engineering is not bad: what can be bad is what you do with it.
SUCKMYMUSCLE