Nasser vs Dillet - better BB'er

[NarcissisticDeity]

  

[Sherief Shalaby]

Outed!

 

[Nirvana]

dillett just always looked a little "crooked".

anyways great thread, people are actually talking objectivly about nasser and not just "bitter old oily scumbag shit-backed terrorist"

[Sherief Shalaby]

 

 

[Sherief Shalaby]

something i was always noticing in dillett's rear delts that they were HUGE but always looked like bags of water.. never looked detailed and hard as the ideal shape!!.. i am not saying he was filling anything in them,.. i am sure he had only muscles inside but just his genetics shape!!..

[Nirvana]

something i was always noticing in dillett's rear delts that they were HUGE but always looked like bags of water.. never looked detailed and hard as the ideal shape!!.. i am not saying he was filling anything in them,.. i am sure he had only muscles inside but just his genetics shape!!..

they seemed to take all the work in his back workouts

[NarcissisticDeity]

\

Nasser is owning those guys but you can tell even with the detailed back it's still behind delts & arms which are great compared to latter days his delts were great and his arms showed much better separation , his physique really was great when he was lighter

[Sherief Shalaby]

\

Nasser is owning those guys but you can tell even with the detailed back it's still behind delts & arms which are great compared to latter days his delts were great and his arms showed much better separation , his physique really was great when he was lighter

imo at around 260 pounds his back could be better than levrone's back!!..

[NarcissisticDeity]

something i was always noticing in dillett's rear delts that they were HUGE but always looked like bags of water.. never looked detailed and hard as the ideal shape!!.. i am not saying he was filling anything in them,.. i am sure he had only muscles inside but just his genetics shape!!..

I posted that I think on page one , his delts were just huge and soft , looked glossy with no separation between the heads or striations

[lesaucer]

imo at around 260 pounds his back could be better than levrone's back!!..

levrone own the shit out of nasser, any bodyparts, its not even close lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

imo at around 260 pounds his back could be better than levrone's back!!..

Maybe

[mesmorph78]

Dillet a billion times over ..... No contest

[the_swami]

Nasser's back was not weak.

it was wide , thick and developed.- you can see that in the RLS with Dorian

where it was not quite as good as Dorian was in dryness and seperation. But that is the only pose where Dorian jsut edges Nasser- ONE pose, the BDB, all others Nasser easily over DOrian.

Nasser did not have a weak back.

when you talk of weak backs you  should talk of Dillet, Matarazzo, Porter Cottrell

[gcb]

perhaps based on their records Nasser was better, but on potential Dillet blew everyone away - I just don't understand how he never really got it together.

[littleguns]

Someone mentioned it...Nasser was big but Dillet was freaky...just the Wow factor...will always be known for "locking up" I believe at the Arnold and being carried off like a cardboard cut out!

[cephissus]

haha I wish there was a video of that, so badly!!

[Skeletor]

Dillet had huge potential and he stood out due to the freakiness and also because he was a bit taller than the others, too bad he never learned to pose well.
Nasser was more consistent in his conditioning for most of his career.
This picture is unreal, not sure if its shopped because the proportions are just out of this world.

[Palpatine Q]

Nasser's back was not weak.

it was wide , thick and developed.- you can see that in the RLS with Dorian

where it was not quite as good as Dorian was in dryness and seperation. But that is the only pose where Dorian jsut edges Nasser- ONE pose, the BDB, all others Nasser easily over DOrian.

Nasser did not have a weak back.

when you talk of weak backs you  should talk of Dillet, Matarazzo, Porter Cottrell

Nasser had a weak back...get over it

[Sherief Shalaby]

I posted that I think on page one , his delts were just huge and soft , looked glossy with no separation between the heads or striations

yes and i seriously hadnt read your post before writing mine!!.. seems that we both agree on many points (of course aside of anything related to dorian as then you are turned to be blind)

[WillGrant]

Dillett was a freak, but Nasser by a mile and in fact.

QFT 

[Figo]

how does a guy with no mind-muscle connection whatsoever - unable to fully contract a muscle for a pose - build a physique of such dimensions?

its like someone with hooves writing a classic piano symphony

I remember 93 olympia he couldnt do, never mind hold a most muscular, side chest, lat spread...

[keanu]

Paul had much better overall genetics for bodyparts (back aside), but onstage his conditioning was lacking, the details and seperation were often not there. His muscle display was horrible. He trained light and rested a long time in between sets. He looked like he'd train high.

Nasser made the most of his genetics and was a better bodybuilder then Paul.

[BayGBM]

Paul had much better overall genetics for bodyparts (back aside), but onstage his conditioning was lacking, the details and seperation were often not there. His muscle display was horrible. He trained light and rested a long time in between sets. He looked like he'd train high.

Nasser made the most of his genetics and was a better bodybuilder then Paul.

x2

[Parker]

 

Dillett looks more symmetrical and has better abs, and fuller rounder muscle bellies...

[Captain Equipoise]

Nasser's back was not weak.

it was wide , thick and developed.- you can see that in the RLS with Dorian

where it was not quite as good as Dorian was in dryness and seperation. But that is the only pose where Dorian jsut edges Nasser- ONE pose, the BDB, all others Nasser easily over DOrian.

Nasser did not have a weak back.

when you talk of weak backs you  should talk of Dillet, Matarazzo, Porter Cottrell

You are delusional..