New Pics of 01 ASC Ronnie

[NarcissisticDeity]

Brutal no explanation!

I call total bullshit on "density". It is just being ripped and dry as fuck. You cannot see intramuscular fat.

I did explain , you don't like the answer , in fact I gave you a detailed explanation and gave you a perfect analogy between Dillett & Yates

yes it's a elaborate scam to deceive people into thinking Dorian had any advantages over his competition 

[AbrahamG]

Best ever.  The only physique close would be the one that Dorian presented at the 93 German Grand Prix. 

[Jaime]

Dorian had more bone density and hardness, you could see this clearly in X rays.

[NarcissisticDeity]

It sure sounds like it. Take some unknown thing like "density" and claim you can actually see the intramuscular fat levels  

Brutal making up shit to gain an extra advantage

It can be seen externally when the muscle is totally devoid of fat & water ( duh ) Ronnie at his best 2001 was dry as fuck and dense as stone especially compared to say 2000 when he was much heavier ( i.e carrying more intramuscular fat ) get it? it doesn't just apply to him it applies to everyone .

Ronnie was 245-247lbs in 01 and 264 in 00 , so this tells us he was carrying not more muscle in 00 but more sq fat and he was holding more water , the ideal situation is to carry the most amount of muscle while being the leanest & driest , which is extremely difficult to do , especially on a consistent basis , which is exactly the reason a vast majority of people feel 1998/2001 was Ronnie's best showings ever and it's no coincidence he was at his lightest or densest yet didn't appear so , see how it works?  

[Jaime]

You are basically saying here it is another word for low bf and no water, two already well known criteria, merged into a words like "density" and "intramuscular fat" to make it sound like there is some double advantage?

Haha. Yeah pretty much.

[NarcissisticDeity]

You are basically saying here it is another word for low bf and no water, two already well known criteria, merged into a words like "density" and "intramuscular fat" to make it sound like there is some double advantage?

No there is no such thing is density  none what so ever , it's a made up word

[NarcissisticDeity]

There is low bodyfat, and dry. "Density" in a muscle = sounds like bullshit.

Well sounds like you just exposed the world of bodybuilding for pulling the wool over everyone eyes , congrats 

[Shockwave]

Meltdown.

Xerxes Meltdown.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Meltdown.

Says the guy who just got a comprehensive explanation and still can't grasp the concept  even started another thread 

[dyslexic]

[Shockwave]

Epic brutal meltdown.

[Shockwave]

Epic brutal meltdown.

Epic self-Meltdown.

[dyslexic]

[RocketSwitch625]

Basically the Yates fans have been saying this to Coleman nut-huggers for the past 18 years approx:

[NeoSeminole]

You are basically saying here it is another word for low bf and no water, two already well known criteria, merged into a words like "density" and "intramuscular fat" to make it sound like there is some double advantage?

you are thinking too logically. Most of these terms like "density" and "dryness" are synonyms that bodybuilding journalists use so they don't keep repeating themselves in their contest reviews. Either you're conditioned or you're not

[IceCold]

sonny's look pretty much sums it up.


at least 10 lbs bigger than ronnie in 01.




remember, yates defeated the best bbers of all time in their prime:  nasser, shawn, flex, kevin, paul, etc.

ronnie faced the same guys as they were on their way out.

AND lost rounds and contests to gustavo baddell and gunter schlierkamp.

[NeoSeminole]

at least 10 lbs bigger than ronnie in 01.

on paper? Yes. In person? No. 10 lbs on Dorian's frame is not the same as 10 lbs on Ronnie's frame. If you really want to play the numbers game, then 03 Ronnie at 287 lbs would dwarf a 30 lbs lighter Dorian

remember, yates defeated the best bbers of all time in their prime:  nasser, shawn, flex, kevin, paul, etc.

so did Ronnie. Ronnie beat a prime Kevin, Flex, Jay, Chris Cormier, Dexter Jackson, etc

Ronnie not only won the Mr. Olympia more times but he also beat more future Mr. Olympias than Dorian

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie looking 10 lbs lighter, lol

[Game Time]

Ronnie looking 10 lbs lighter, lol

Yates was great, but looks like a sack of shit next to Ron
/thread

[mesmorph78]

LOL whenever I read your posts, I always picture a woman defending herself, trying her hardest not to burst into tears.

ha ha exactly they reek of desperation....
he is completly obsessed with coleman
he has all the quotes saved on his computer he just copies and pastes them whenever a ronnie thread pops up
for a guy who doesnt rate or likes colemans phsyique suprisingly enough probably 80%of his posts are on ronnie threads
 

to contribute to the thread...
imo 2001 arnld ronnie is overated
99, 98, 2000 etc i prefer

[HTexan]

the greatest

[IceCold]

so did Ronnie. Ronnie beat a prime Kevin, Flex, Jay, Chris Cormier, Dexter Jackson, etc

flex and kevin were at their best facing dorian - not ronnie.

you mean a legless levrone and a too heavy, synthol filled flex wheeler?

cormier?  please - wasnt even top 6 against the guys yates faced.

dont even try to compare jay and dex to anyone from the 90's not even close.

[IceCold]

on paper? Yes. In person? No. 10 lbs on Dorian's frame is not the same as 10 lbs on Ronnie's frame. If you really want to play the numbers game, then 03 Ronnie at 287 lbs would dwarf a 30 lbs lighter Dorian

try again.  ronnie was no where near the shape/condition of his prior years, let alone yates.

he would have looked offseason at 287 standing next to yates.

[IceCold]

Ronnie looking 10 lbs lighter, lol

thanks for posting a picture of ronnie standing right in front of the camera to appear larger.




anyways, i still think ronnie in 98-99 was best.

98 he was in better condition than 99, but had the gyno.

[NarcissisticDeity]

you are thinking too logically. Most of these terms like "density" and "dryness" are synonyms that bodybuilding journalists use so they don't keep repeating themselves in their contest reviews. Either you're conditioned or you're not

Says the guy who thought balance & proportion were the same thing. 

density and dryness are NOT the same thing , need correcting let me know.