Author Topic: In my humble opinion... (Read 8726 times)

dj181 · « **on:** January 09, 2011, 10:43:42 AM »

Moderate level intensity aerobic training works MUCH BETTER that high intensity aerobic training for fat loss. Discuss FYI, sub-7 is lean, 10% is average, and over 12% is fat

mass243 · « **Reply #1 on:** January 09, 2011, 10:45:20 AM »

Whatever is Fatpanda's choice, I go with it

dj181 · « **Reply #2 on:** January 09, 2011, 10:54:40 AM »

Fatpanda kinda, sorta knows what he's talking about, but me thinks that his problem is that he can't or just doesn't want to train hard enough to get optimal results. But, to stick to the topic of this thread, I've noticed through my own experiences that 30 min of moderate aerobic effort gives MUCH BETTER fat loss results, than 15 min of HIIT.

mass243 · « **Reply #3 on:** January 09, 2011, 10:56:40 AM »

interval is the way to go. Few mins intense, then low intense.

Reeves · « **Reply #4 on:** January 09, 2011, 10:57:02 AM »

Quote from: dj181 on January 09, 2011, 10:43:42 AM

Moderate level intensity aerobic training works MUCH BETTER that high intensity aerobic training for fat loss. Discuss FYI, sub-7 is lean, 10% is average, and over 12% is fat

This makes me morbidly obese.

Man of Steel · « **Reply #5 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:01:15 AM »

Quote from: dj181 on January 09, 2011, 10:43:42 AM

Moderate level intensity aerobic training works MUCH BETTER that high intensity aerobic training for fat loss. Discuss FYI, sub-7 is lean, 10% is average, and over 12% is fat

Disagree, adjust each category down 3 percentage points for appropriate Getbig standards.

dj181 · « **Reply #6 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:07:34 AM »

True dat! Most getbiggers claims of being 7% are actually much closer to being 12%

JimmyJam1974 · « **Reply #7 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:27:49 AM »

Please go to hell.

spude · « **Reply #8 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:29:59 AM »

Quote from: dj181 on January 09, 2011, 10:43:42 AM

Moderate level intensity aerobic training works MUCH BETTER that high intensity aerobic training for fat loss. Discuss FYI, sub-7 is lean, 10% is average, and over 12% is fat

For the first, or maybe second, time ever...you are absolutely right, my man...

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #9 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:35:03 AM »

Yes high intensity aerobics regularly will effect recovery and muscle growth.

dj181 · « **Reply #10 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:44:24 AM »

I told you that I know a thing or two bout fat loss

HTexan · « **Reply #11 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:48:55 AM »

if you only want to lose weight. high will burn more weight then mod.

Jizzacked · « **Reply #12 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:53:27 AM »

dj, can you tell the story about how you are going to go below 5% bf on 800 cals and the occasional black coffee? it never gets old

Hulkotron · « **Reply #13 on:** January 09, 2011, 11:54:31 AM »

Quote from: Jizzacked on January 09, 2011, 11:53:27 AM

dj, can you tell the story about how you are going to go below 5% bf on 800 cals and the occasional black coffee? it never gets old

After that he can tell us about his mythical "peak" at 165 lbs where he squatted 185x10

spude · « **Reply #14 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:05:55 PM »

Quote from: Hulkotron on January 09, 2011, 11:54:31 AM

After that he can tell us about his mythical "peak" at 165 lbs where he squatted 185x10

Brutal, just brutal!!

chaos · « **Reply #15 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:07:35 PM »

Quote from: Hulkotron on January 09, 2011, 11:54:31 AM

After that he can tell us about his mythical "peak" at 165 lbs where he squatted 185x10

When you're 4'8", 165lbs is massive!!!

kiwiol · « **Reply #16 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:09:44 PM »

Quote from: Jizzacked on January 09, 2011, 11:53:27 AM

dj, can you tell the story about how you are going to go below 5% bf on 800 cals and the occasional black coffee? it never gets old

lol

dj181 · « **Reply #17 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:20:01 PM »

Yeah I know dat I gots a brutal squat, by come try and hang wit me on back day

By da way, I AM GETTING LEANER AND LEANER, thank you very much

Oh, and what little muscle I do lost on dis 800 cal diet, I will quickly gain it back and then some once I reach a satisfactorly level of bf

_bruce_ · « **Reply #18 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:25:12 PM »

Nothing humble about having ~~a kitkat~~ an opinion.
Now go and rep out with a bench and some dumbbells.

chaos · « **Reply #19 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:26:02 PM »

Quote from: dj181 on January 09, 2011, 12:20:01 PM

Yeah I know dat I gots a brutal squat, by come try and hang wit me on back day By da way, I AM GETTING LEANER AND LEANER, thank you very much Oh, and what little muscle I do lost on dis 800 cal diet, I will quickly gain it back and then some once I reach a satisfactorly level of bf

Whats your back routine look like?

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #20 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:27:10 PM »

Quote from: dj181 on January 09, 2011, 10:43:42 AM

Moderate level intensity aerobic training works MUCH BETTER that high intensity aerobic training for fat loss. Discuss FYI, sub-7 is lean, 10% is average, and over 12% is fat

Define aerobic training.

dj181 · « **Reply #21 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:33:05 PM »

Right now I'm doing weighted wide grip chins, db shrugs, and SLD's.

Coach is Back! · « **Reply #22 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:34:18 PM »

Quote from: The Coach on January 09, 2011, 12:27:10 PM

Define aerobic training.

^^^

chaos · « **Reply #23 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:36:51 PM »

Quote from: dj181 on January 09, 2011, 12:33:05 PM

Right now I'm doing weighted wide grip chins, db shrugs, and SLD's.

No deads, rows of any kind?

dj181 · « **Reply #24 on:** January 09, 2011, 12:39:10 PM »

Well, to me arobic training is training that lasts longer than 3 min, coz that's the point in time when aerobic energy provides the majority of the fuel for the training bout. But, my point is that moderate level "threshold training" or AT if you like, is MUCH BETTER than HIIT for fat-loss purposes. Plus, it doesn't cut into recovery ability the way that HIIT does. At least this had been my own personal experience.