Author Topic: Levrone Owns Coleman in this Back Shot!!.. (Read 9098 times)

Jaime · « **Reply #25 on:** January 10, 2011, 08:13:39 AM »

I would much rather look like Kev than Ronnie, juiced up that is he looked like shit when he went off.

They have been rewarding the wrong physiques for donkeys years.

Lion666 · « **Reply #26 on:** January 10, 2011, 11:00:40 AM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on January 10, 2011, 02:55:54 AM

Levrone is definitely owning Coleman there. Better back width with much better mid-back development.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

not sure its actually width,,, maybe bc his lats are higher they look wider,,, ronnie's insert lower to the waist make them look dif,,, example take a guy thats 5'10 120lbs now take the same guy and add 100lbs of muscle to frame and big shldrs he now looks shorter...
maybe its me nut i think judges got it rite,ron 1st jay was 2nd,,, it was close between them jay had ab thi but ron had everythng else.

Earl1972 · « **Reply #27 on:** January 10, 2011, 11:02:03 AM »

Mr. Levrone

i miss you

E

Lion666 · « **Reply #28 on:** January 10, 2011, 11:04:35 AM »

Quote from: Nirvana on January 10, 2011, 06:11:44 AM

agreed.

coleman not on his best day is still good enough. he wasn't honestly that bad.

just because he was not in his best condition ever, and jay cutler was, doesn't mean he sucked.

how demoralizing that has to b,,, not only do u have to b better than ur best,,, your opponent still doesnt hav to be at his best to beat u,,, lol to b able to come in off ur game whn everyone else is on or beyond theirs and still mop em up,,, thats an imprssv champ waxn ass yr aftr yr

disco_stu · « **Reply #29 on:** January 10, 2011, 12:25:30 PM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on January 10, 2011, 12:10:21 AM

i agree to some extent but still if what you are saying is right markus would have been mr. olympia!!..

imo lee haney deserved all his olympia victories.. dorian deserved 3 or 4 (if we add 94),.. ronnie didn't deserve to win at least 3 times of his olympia wins.. jay didnt deserve to win in 2007 for sure!!..

yes, well, i assumed that readers would put my comment into context for what it was, not blind literal interpretation.

labrada had haney and yates beat in 1990.
i wouldve been happy either way if gaspari was awarded one victory.

Shawn Ray didnt deserve to win any. Even in his best years, there were one or two guys better than him without doubt- and thats using the "proper" judging criteria.

I never did see the attraction in Shawns blocky quads, horrible FDB (no arms and disappearing chest), and mediocre FLS. He looked great in rear double bi, and good in abs and quads, and was mostly well conditioned...and in certain poses looked like a world beater. But his weaknesses held him back. LL was definitely a better bodybuilder and from memory beat him almost every time they competed.

Big Worm · « **Reply #30 on:** January 10, 2011, 12:39:36 PM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on January 10, 2011, 08:11:51 AM

i am not a big fan of his physique because for me it doesn't go well together (as a whole).. he has great parts for sure and his back, biceps, and shoulders are from the best ever but still his weak points affect the whole thing!!.. still i agree with some of his wins like in 98, 99, and, 2003..

who mentioned nasser now you piece of filth??.. try to get him out of your stupid mind for one single day

You always in some way shape or form, mention that drug addict loser.. You fuckin bum..

dr.chimps · « **Reply #31 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:03:41 PM »

Quote from: Big Worm on January 10, 2011, 12:39:36 PM

You always in some way shape or form, mention that drug addict loser.. You fuckin bum..

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #32 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:10:21 PM »

Quote from: dr.chimps on January 10, 2011, 01:03:41 PM

Ha classic.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #33 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:13:39 PM »

another classic classy thread by a classic classy getbigger

caseyviator · « **Reply #34 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:36:23 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on January 10, 2011, 02:55:54 AM

Levrone is definitely owning Coleman there. Better back width with much better mid-back development.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

whhhhaaat r u serious or is this a joke kevin isnt in the same league of ron...ron blows him away, no problem

how can you say this???

Hulkster · « **Reply #35 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:44:07 PM »

ronnie always owned levrone

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #36 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:48:07 PM »

Quote from: closeline on January 10, 2011, 02:52:02 AM

LOL

ronnie was far ahead of the other competitors

he ownes levrone in upperbody AND Levrone forgot his legs in hotel room
levrone should have been 2nd, because being a fridge is not cool
EVERY EXPERT CAN SEE IT (only i-net BB don t)

agreed...

coleman won 2001

jay had him on quad seperation and abs thats it..
coleman rounder fuller and 100% better muscle shape....
no contest
coleman clearly won
jay came in in the contest in the shape of his life yes was he better than colemn
no

Hulkster · « **Reply #37 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:51:36 PM »

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #38 on:** January 10, 2011, 01:57:37 PM »

Quote from: Lion666 on January 10, 2011, 11:00:40 AM

not sure its actually width,,, maybe bc his lats are higher they look wider,,, ronnie's insert lower to the waist make them look dif,,, example take a guy thats 5'10 120lbs now take the same guy and add 100lbs of muscle to frame and big shldrs he now looks shorter...
maybe its me nut i think judges got it rite,ron 1st jay was 2nd,,, it was close between them jay had ab thi but ron had everythng else.

exactly ab s and quad seperaation jay one...
ronnie ruled everywhere else

Jaime · « **Reply #39 on:** January 10, 2011, 02:33:24 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 10, 2011, 01:51:36 PM

ouch

Flex is winning that shot...

geneticmarvel · « **Reply #40 on:** January 10, 2011, 02:34:45 PM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on January 09, 2011, 11:44:51 PM

also his great biceps looked very small and not full that year!!..

Jay has em both from the front, no doubt.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #41 on:** January 10, 2011, 02:38:48 PM »

Quote from: Lion666 on January 10, 2011, 11:00:40 AM

not sure its actually width,,, maybe bc his lats are higher they look wider,,, ronnie's insert lower to the waist make them look dif,,, example take a guy thats 5'10 120lbs now take the same guy and add 100lbs of muscle to frame and big shldrs he now looks shorter...
maybe its me nut i think judges got it rite,ron 1st jay was 2nd,,, it was close between them jay had ab thi but ron had everythng else.

Actually, Coleman's lats are pretty high. Guys with low lats are Orville Burk, Markus Ruhl, Jean-Pierre Fux, Joel Stubbs.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

geneticmarvel · « **Reply #42 on:** January 10, 2011, 02:48:31 PM »

Quote from: Jaime on January 10, 2011, 02:33:24 PM

Flex is winning that shot...

With what calve implants?

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #43 on:** January 10, 2011, 03:31:52 PM »

Quote from: disco_stu on January 10, 2011, 12:25:30 PM

yes, well, i assumed that readers would put my comment into context for what it was, not blind literal interpretation.

labrada had haney and yates beat in 1990.
i wouldve been happy either way if gaspari was awarded one victory.

Shawn Ray didnt deserve to win any. Even in his best years, there were one or two guys better than him without doubt- and thats using the "proper" judging criteria.

I never did see the attraction in Shawns blocky quads, horrible FDB (no arms and disappearing chest), and mediocre FLS. He looked great in rear double bi, and good in abs and quads, and was mostly well conditioned...and in certain poses looked like a world beater. But his weaknesses held him back. LL was definitely a better bodybuilder and from memory beat him almost every time they competed.

yates didnt compete at the olympia in 90!!..

ray beat labrada in 1993..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #44 on:** January 10, 2011, 03:35:06 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 10, 2011, 01:51:36 PM

ouch

why are you posting shots from 99!!.. 2001 is the subject of the thread.. sure ronnie dominated the stage in 99!!..

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #45 on:** January 10, 2011, 05:03:28 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on January 10, 2011, 02:38:48 PM

Actually, Coleman's lats are pretty high. Guys with low lats are Orville Burk, Markus Ruhl, Jean-Pierre Fux, Joel Stubbs.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Coleman lats are high?

And Orville lats are low

You must be blind...

TRIX · « **Reply #46 on:** January 10, 2011, 05:20:24 PM »

2001

thickness and leg difference + miles better back

levrone never stood a chance against coleman, maybe dorian

2000

even standing behind kevin ronnies chest and legs are bigger

1998

geneticmarvel · « **Reply #47 on:** January 10, 2011, 06:39:15 PM »

Quote from: TRIX on January 10, 2011, 05:20:24 PM

2001

thickness and leg difference + miles better back

levrone never stood a chance against coleman, maybe dorian

2000

even standing behind kevin ronnies chest and legs are bigger

1998

Is bodybuilding about the more pleasing aesthetic god like physique, or the freaky veiny giant X man?
You seem to only give a shit about size and thats not all bodybuilding is about.

TRIX · « **Reply #48 on:** January 10, 2011, 06:57:50 PM »

So lets give the olympia title to someone you want to jerk off to? So muscle and condition doesnt count. Oh brother

geneticmarvel · « **Reply #49 on:** January 10, 2011, 08:09:51 PM »

Quote from: TRIX on January 10, 2011, 06:57:50 PM

So lets give the olympia title to someone you want to jerk off to? So muscle and condition doesnt count. Oh brother

So does Branch Warren has a desirable physique to you? He places high and is very popular, now why is that boy?!