Author Topic: Lawrence O'Donnell With Trent Franks About Gun Control (Read 3123 times)

blacken700 · « **on:** January 20, 2011, 07:05:41 AM »

great answer, children of god

Purge_WTF · « **Reply #1 on:** January 20, 2011, 04:53:41 PM »

O'Donnell made himself look like a donkey in that clip. The point isn't about how many friggin' bullets that nutcase had. The point should be that he shouldn't have had any guns or bullets because he was a nutcase.

tonymctones · « **Reply #2 on:** January 20, 2011, 05:11:07 PM »

LAUGHING MY FUCKING ASS OFF!!!!

this dousche

"i blame the individual for the first 10 bullets, i blame law for the next 21 bullets"

HAHHAHAHHAHA

are you fucking serious?

goodness gracious this dude is almost as bad as matthews

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #3 on:** January 20, 2011, 05:23:20 PM »

Typical asshole socialist c u n t.

tonymctones · « **Reply #4 on:** January 20, 2011, 05:26:23 PM »

blacken do you blame the law for laughners actions?

or do you blame the nut that pulled the trigger 31 times?

garebear · « **Reply #5 on:** January 20, 2011, 05:26:31 PM »

I quit listening after the fuel tank analogy.

And it was quite an effort to get that far.

tonymctones · « **Reply #6 on:** January 20, 2011, 05:27:34 PM »

Quote from: garebear on January 20, 2011, 05:26:31 PM

I quit listening after the fuel tank analogy.

And it was quite an effort to get that far.

you missed this epic line then...

"i blame the individual for the first 10 bullets, i blame law for the next 21 bullets"

blacken700 · « **Reply #7 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:15:17 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on January 20, 2011, 05:26:23 PM

blacken do you blame the law for laughners actions?

or do you blame the nut that pulled the trigger 31 times?

he pulled the trigger, but if he would had have a regular clip he would have shot only 10 times,live probably would have been saved

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #8 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:17:27 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on January 21, 2011, 08:15:17 AM

he pulled the trigger, but if he would had have a regular clip he would have shot only 10 times,live probably would have been saved

ha ha ha ha ha ha - oh shit - lmafo.

Blacken - where do you live? tell you what - come to NY and i will take you to the range by me and show you the difference between 1 30 round mag vs 3 10 rounders. i'll let you shoot my G17 and G26 and you then report back the difference. Deal?

blacken700 · « **Reply #9 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:23:07 AM »

there is no difference between 1 30 round and 3 ten round

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #10 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:25:27 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on January 21, 2011, 08:23:07 AM

there is no difference between 1 30 round and 3 ten round

Not much at all with someone who knows what they are doing.

Check out Benny's thread about glocks. I posted a vid with a shootout on this type of issue.

blacken700 · « **Reply #11 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:30:51 AM »

they tackled him when he was trying to change clips, so if the same people would have done the same thing he would have got off only ten shots,right.thats 20 bullets that woulld not have been flying around lives would have been saved.

tonymctones · « **Reply #12 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:31:22 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on January 21, 2011, 08:15:17 AM

he pulled the trigger, but if he would had have a regular clip he would have shot only 10 times,live probably would have been saved

by that logic he would have had less if we just had guns that shot one round at a time?

are you for that?

what ppl like you and o'dumbass dont seem to understand is that if you take it away from ppl like him you take it away from ppl that may use it for reasonable puroposes like self defense...

how would you like to be defending your house and have to reload?

or getting car jacked and have to reload?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #13 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:32:08 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on January 21, 2011, 08:30:51 AM

they tackled him when he was trying to change clips, so if the same people would have done the same thing he would have got off only ten shots,right.thats 20 bullets that woulld not have been flying around lives would have been saved.

Yeah, lets make laws based on every individual situation.

What is instead he started shooting from 10 feet away?

tonymctones · « **Reply #14 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:33:03 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on January 21, 2011, 08:30:51 AM

they tackled him when he was trying to change clips, so if the same people would have done the same thing he would have got off only ten shots,right.thats 20 bullets that woulld not have been flying around lives would have been saved.

thats to say the same ppl would have been in the position to do so if he had to reload after 10 rounds...

LMAO anybody with any experience with pistols can change a magazine within 2 or 3 seconds and thats without practice

blacken700 · « **Reply #15 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:35:51 AM »

LMAO anybody with any experience with pistols can change a magazine within 2 or 3 seconds and thats without practice

that wasn't him ,he got stoped

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #16 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:38:14 AM »

Blacken again showing why he is a typical deluded lib.

Do you even own any guns?

Kazan · « **Reply #17 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:39:10 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on January 21, 2011, 08:30:51 AM

they tackled him when he was trying to change clips, so if the same people would have done the same thing he would have got off only ten shots,right.thats 20 bullets that woulld not have been flying around lives would have been saved.

Maybe in this case, but he shot 31 rounds and had what 12 hits, that 38% and he was in a crowd. Now if you have a shooter that know what they are doing you are in trouble, they can change a mag in seconds and put every bullet on target.

blacken700 · « **Reply #18 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:40:43 AM »

Quote from: tonymctones on January 21, 2011, 08:31:22 AM

by that logic he would have had less if we just had guns that shot one round at a time?

are you for that?

what ppl like you and o'dumbass dont seem to understand is that if you take it away from ppl like him you take it away from ppl that may use it for reasonable puroposes like self defense...

how would you like to be defending your house and have to reload?

or getting car jacked and have to reload?

if you have to have 30 shots to defend your house i would move out of that neighborhood

tonymctones · « **Reply #19 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:40:56 AM »

lol blacken you think you could close a gap that you would be within while he was shooting the first mag?

LMAO

tonymctones · « **Reply #20 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:41:43 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on January 21, 2011, 08:40:43 AM

if you have to have 30 shots to defend your house i would move out of that neighborhood

thats good i dont really want your kind around me as it is

LOL and i have much much more than 30 rounds to defend my house there darlin

tonymctones · « **Reply #21 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:42:35 AM »

One handed again, you think you could close a gap that you would be within while he was shooting the first mag blacken?

tonymctones · « **Reply #22 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:44:22 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on January 21, 2011, 08:35:51 AM

LMAO anybody with any experience with pistols can change a magazine within 2 or 3 seconds and thats without practice

that wasn't him ,he got stoped

yes HE did, so what is capping mags going to do against the person who can change mags in less than 2 seconds?

tonymctones · « **Reply #23 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:47:50 AM »

LMAO a perfect example...STOCK GLOCKS

speed reloading

tell me you think you could close the gap you would have between you two b/c you would be hiding behind something in the amount of time it takes these gentlemen to reload blacken?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #24 on:** January 21, 2011, 08:48:57 AM »

Author Topic: Lawrence O'Donnell With Trent Franks About Gun Control (Read 3123 times)

Purge_WTF