Author Topic: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW  (Read 16038 times)

spude

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 894
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #25 on: January 22, 2011, 01:20:05 PM »
5'7" is the perfect height for bodybuilding, and 5'3" is the perfect height for a female (especially with regards to gorgeous asses, as petite women have the best asses BY FAR)

dat is 100% true, dj ma man...

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #26 on: January 22, 2011, 01:37:05 PM »
Apart from his chest lee kills these guys. Even if he is a liar
Its a photochop, because Lee was never compares to these guys on the same stage---he would have gotten killed...

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11702
  • Getbig!
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #27 on: January 22, 2011, 07:30:02 PM »
Lee is all arms, and synthol at that.
Wonder how much Heath can military press...
Lee's arms were huge, before synthol was around ;)

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #28 on: January 22, 2011, 07:41:55 PM »
What show was that   ;D


its not a from a show..... those three have'nt actually been onstage together .....

dogbowl

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Team anyone except heath
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #29 on: January 22, 2011, 07:43:07 PM »
If Wolf had better calves then that might be the best front lat spread ever

Edited to add:  If you're going to have bigger thighs than Dorian, you also need calves bigger than his.  He had the right proportions of upper to lower leg, IMO.

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #30 on: January 22, 2011, 07:47:01 PM »
If Wolf had better calves then that might be the best front lat spread ever

Edited to add:  If you're going to have bigger thighs than Dorian, you also need calves bigger than his.  He had the right proportions of upper to lower leg, IMO.


nonsense


dorian had the best lats from the front ever .........and probably the best front lat spread...(overall pose)

dogbowl

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Team anyone except heath
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #31 on: January 22, 2011, 07:49:28 PM »

nonsense


dorian had the best lats from the front ever .........and probably the best front lat spread...(overall pose)

No argument from me here.  There was a big "if" in my statement.  I think a lot of guys now have thighs which ruin their proportions, including Ronnie.  Calves in general seemed to have hit their limit, while thighs are bigger than ever.

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #32 on: January 22, 2011, 07:52:09 PM »
No argument from me here.  There was a big "if" in my statement.  I think a lot of guys now have thighs which ruin their proportions, including Ronnie.  Calves in general seemed to have hit their limit, while thighs are bigger than ever.

yep i agree..... calves need to be in proportion to the thighs...... dorian/nasser/matarazzo.......... as u said ..... thighs are gettin bigger and bigger..... and most guys have shite calves...... wolf/coleman/dexter/ etc etc

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #33 on: January 22, 2011, 07:53:33 PM »
yep i agree..... calves need to be in proportion to the thighs...... dorian/nasser/matarazzo.......... as u said ..... thighs are gettin bigger and bigger..... and most guys have shite calves...... wolf/coleman/dexter/ etc etc

Kai, Branch, Heath, Jay all have pretty good calves.

geneticmarvel

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 860
  • "You've got size, but you don't have my size!"
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #34 on: January 22, 2011, 08:44:40 PM »
Lee's arms were huge, before synthol was around ;)

eat this lee worshipper

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #35 on: January 22, 2011, 08:46:20 PM »



lol wtf.......what happened to lee?.......ive been outta the loop whats the story?

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11702
  • Getbig!
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #36 on: January 22, 2011, 09:33:14 PM »
eat this lee worshipper
You stupid ass that is when he tore his bicep. You youngsters.

Jadeveon Clowney

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5936
  • The life is like a case of chocolate bonbon.
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #37 on: January 22, 2011, 09:40:13 PM »
You stupid ass that is when he tore his bicep. You youngsters.

Synthol causes muscle tears.

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11702
  • Getbig!
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #38 on: January 22, 2011, 09:47:53 PM »
Point is lee had huge arms like 20 years ago, way before synthol. I have never seen Greg V with torn biceps.

geneticmarvel

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 860
  • "You've got size, but you don't have my size!"
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #39 on: January 22, 2011, 09:49:16 PM »
Point is lee had huge arms like 20 years ago, way before synthol. I have never seen Greg V with torn biceps.

lee it is you

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #40 on: January 22, 2011, 09:50:00 PM »
You stupid ass that is when he tore his bicep. You youngsters.


torn bicep does'nt normally look like that.......shame though, lee had the arms

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #41 on: January 22, 2011, 09:58:43 PM »
even the priest is wider

lees arms arent better or bigger then heaths, nor is is head 1.5 times larger then heaths, strong scaling phaggot



but yes heath is narrow (particularly his chest width)


jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11702
  • Getbig!
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #42 on: January 22, 2011, 10:09:18 PM »
lee it is you
No its gh15 jk. You know Lee is just AAS and GH, not synthol.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #43 on: January 22, 2011, 10:21:44 PM »
I wish i was that "narrow".  ::)

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #44 on: January 22, 2011, 10:45:54 PM »


looooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo l

DSM18

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 116
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #45 on: January 22, 2011, 11:02:30 PM »
What show was that   ;D

it was photoshop classic!

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #46 on: January 22, 2011, 11:47:21 PM »


looooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo l

i know he's the closest to the camera but its crazy how wolf just absolutely owns everyone in pure size and width.

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #47 on: January 22, 2011, 11:57:30 PM »

closeline

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #48 on: January 23, 2011, 02:50:20 AM »

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #49 on: January 23, 2011, 03:00:00 AM »
i've said it before and i'll say it again.

lee priest has the greatest ever arms in bodybuilding.

heaths are good - but the priests are great.
175lbs by 31st July