« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW  (Read 16012 times)

closeline

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #50 on: January 23, 2011, 03:11:52 AM »
Quote from: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 03:00:00 AM
i've said it before and i'll say it again.

lee priest has the greatest ever arms in bodybuilding.

heaths are good - but the priests are great.

heath are synthetic shit

priest are good but to short to  be great

great : arnold , ronnie,
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #51 on: January 23, 2011, 03:27:13 AM »
Quote from: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 03:00:00 AM
i've said it before and i'll say it again.

lee priest has the greatest ever arms in bodybuilding.

heaths are good - but the priests are great.
Why, do you think Lee's are the greatest in bbing? State your reasoning... 
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #52 on: January 23, 2011, 05:25:53 AM »
Quote from: closeline on January 22, 2011, 05:40:27 AM
even the priest is wider

they look like stairs ;D
Logged

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #53 on: January 23, 2011, 05:41:23 AM »
yes liar priest is wider
Logged

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #54 on: January 23, 2011, 06:44:37 AM »
Quote from: Parker on January 23, 2011, 03:27:13 AM
Why, do you think Lee's are the greatest in bbing? State your reasoning... 

look at them ! they are complete, large, thick/dense, detailed, balanced.
Logged
175lbs by 31st July

geneticmarvel

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 860
  • "You've got size, but you don't have my size!"
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #55 on: January 23, 2011, 07:53:11 AM »
Quote from: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 06:44:37 AM
look at them ! they are complete, large, thick/dense, detailed, balanced.

Arnold and Coleman. I wouldnt want arms like Lee's
Logged

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #56 on: January 23, 2011, 07:53:49 AM »
Quote from: geneticmarvel on January 23, 2011, 07:53:11 AM
Arnold and Coleman. I wouldnt want arms like Lee's

both had poor tri's compared to bi's.

not to mention no forearms
Logged
175lbs by 31st July

mass243

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12873
  • On right side of the history!
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #57 on: January 23, 2011, 08:14:50 AM »
Quote from: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 07:53:49 AM
both had poor tri's compared to bi's.

not to mention no forearms

For once panda is right!
Lees arms were complete package. He had it all; biceps, triceps and forearms.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83628
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #58 on: January 23, 2011, 08:40:55 AM »
Quote from: Fatpanda on January 23, 2011, 07:53:49 AM
both had poor tri's compared to bi's.

not to mention no forearms

I agree Priest stands alone in arms , although Phil may beat or be at the least equal to him , Heath has the triceps , and forearms not sure his biceps are better than Lee's.
Logged

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #59 on: January 23, 2011, 08:51:09 AM »
Quote from: mass243 on January 23, 2011, 08:14:50 AM
once again panda is right!
Lees arms were complete package. He had it all; biceps, triceps and forearms.

fixed for truth.
Logged
175lbs by 31st July

SilverSpoon

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1820
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #60 on: January 23, 2011, 09:44:36 AM »
While Lee's arms are no doubt complete, they are too "stubby", due to him being approximately 5'2.
I know he says he is 5'4" or some nonsense, but I am 6'1" tall on the dot, my friend is 5'5" (who competes) and when we met Priest, my friend towered over him.

In my opinion, Sergio Oliva's arms, after training with Jones for the 1972 Olympia in Essen, were the most complete arms we will ever see (forearms, bis and tris).
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83628
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #61 on: January 23, 2011, 09:53:10 AM »
Quote from: SilverSpoon on January 23, 2011, 09:44:36 AM
While Lee's arms are no doubt complete, they are too "stubby", due to him being approximately 5'2.
I know he says he is 5'4" or some nonsense, but I am 6'1" tall on the dot, my friend is 5'5" (who competes) and when we met Priest, my friend towered over him.

In my opinion, Sergio Oliva's arms, after training with Jones for the 1972 Olympia in Essen, were the most complete arms we will ever see (forearms, bis and tris).

Sergios biceps sucked always have always will
Logged

yates fan

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 915
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #62 on: January 23, 2011, 09:55:32 AM »
sergio while massive had very little peak to his bicep.
Logged

closeline

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #63 on: January 23, 2011, 09:56:54 AM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 23, 2011, 09:53:10 AM
Sergios biceps sucked always have always will

correct, he had strange shape , would not want to have such ugly arms

Logged

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28190
  • And he was just like a great darkwing
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #64 on: January 23, 2011, 10:03:34 AM »
Sergio's biceps "sucked" because he literally couldn't flex his arm completely, coz he arms were so massive
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83628
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #65 on: January 23, 2011, 10:09:21 AM »
Quote from: dj181 on January 23, 2011, 10:03:34 AM
Sergio's biceps "sucked" because he literally couldn't flex his arm completely, coz he arms were so massive

give me a fucking break
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83628
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #66 on: January 23, 2011, 10:10:40 AM »
 :-\
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83628
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #67 on: January 23, 2011, 10:12:24 AM »
biceps leave a lot to be desired , triceps and forearms were oustanding
Logged

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28190
  • And he was just like a great darkwing
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #68 on: January 23, 2011, 10:16:28 AM »
Those aren't my words, AJ said that, and if you know anything about Jones you know that 1. He doesn't lie 2. He was literally obsessed with measurements, calculations, etc
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #69 on: January 23, 2011, 10:22:53 AM »
albert beckles arms (bi/tri) are among the best ever!!..
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83628
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #70 on: January 23, 2011, 10:24:44 AM »
Quote from: dj181 on January 23, 2011, 10:16:28 AM
Those aren't my words, AJ said that, and if you know anything about Jones you know that 1. He doesn't lie 2. He was literally obsessed with measurements, calculations, etc

lmao he doesn't lie  ::) see the pics I posted he's clearly flexing them perfectly fine
Logged

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #71 on: January 23, 2011, 02:59:55 PM »
lee priest..... most complete arms i can think of atm.......sergio didnt fully contract the biceps and did the palms facing out thing to make his biceps appear longer ..... when he already had a low biceps tie in.... idiot, his son seems to do the same thing

beckles had awesome peaked biceps and great tris...... no forearms though and jaggy elbows

heath has the arms.......amazing forearm development..... bis and tris are there too.....

matarazzo had complete massive arms.........

coleman obviously .....but no tris ....they appeared flat although they were not at all small

Logged

dogbowl

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Team anyone except heath
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #72 on: January 23, 2011, 03:10:36 PM »
Quote from: monstercalves on January 23, 2011, 02:59:55 PM
sergio didnt fully contract the biceps and did the palms facing out thing to make his biceps appear longer ..... when he already had a low biceps tie in

I'm going to agree with the negative comments about his biceps.  He had a strange way of flexing his arms in the front double biceps
Logged

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #73 on: January 23, 2011, 03:17:57 PM »
Quote from: dogbowl on January 23, 2011, 03:10:36 PM
I'm going to agree with the negative comments about his biceps.  He had a strange way of flexing his arms in the front double biceps


he didnt close his arm enough to contract the biceps...... also always had his palms facing outwards which makes the biceps appear long and flat.........
Logged

Alexander D

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1337
  • Johnny Falcon for President
Re: PHIL HEATH is SO NARROW
« Reply #74 on: January 23, 2011, 03:18:16 PM »
Quote from: monstercalves on January 23, 2011, 02:59:55 PM
lee priest..... most complete arms i can think of atm.......sergio didnt fully contract the biceps and did the palms facing out thing to make his biceps appear longer ..... when he already had a low biceps tie in.... idiot, his son seems to do the same thing

beckles had awesome peaked biceps and great tris...... no forearms though and jaggy elbows

heath has the arms.......amazing forearm development..... bis and tris are there too.....

matarazzo had complete massive arms.........

coleman obviously .....but no tris ....they appeared flat although they were not at all small




Gayer than Johnnynoname watching Andersoon Cooper 360 and masturbating.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »