Besides possible guest suprises like HHH and Sting? Timmy tries to stay positive. But this years Mania doesn't look promising.
The problem is that they aren't building the Edge/Del Rio feud for WrestleMania. Edge is still stuck with Dolph Ziggler. Building the feud is tough enough to do in just two months. The best title matches, involving the Royal Rumble winner, usually are when the winner faces a champion with whom a beef has been building or already existed for MONTHS (Angle-Lesnar, Edge-Undertaker, Rock-Austin [WM17]).
This is why I don't necessarily like this whole Rumble-winner-gets-title-shot-at-WrestleMania deal. The main event match should be the match that is the most anticipated and likely to deliver the best performance.
Orton won the Rumble in 2009. Yet, his title match with Helmsley was mediocre at best. The main event should have been 'Taker vs. Michaels).
Last year, Edge won the Rumble. Was his match with Jericho the "main event"? NO!! It was 'Taker vs. Michaels (Streak vs. Career); they actually got it right.
In fact, 'Taker and Michaels did that back in 1997. Their first match was made the main event at "In Your House: Ground Zero", because tickets sales flopped, when the main event was a title match, between Bret Hart and the Patriot.
And, of course, at "In Your House: Badd Blood", the Hell-In-A-Cell match was top draw; there was no WWF title match.
My point: You don't need a World title match to be the main event of WrestleMania. The first WrestleMania and the last one have proven that.
This is especially true because, if the WWE/World Champion is a heel, he's dropping the belt 80% of the time (in other words, Miz is toast!!!).