Author Topic: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions  (Read 35840 times)

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #25 on: February 17, 2011, 11:45:38 PM »

Ah, a guest posing pic...I think that is from the time  he went to his his island to guest posed...

And obody has posted the Shawn Ray guest posing pic... 

disco_stu

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4953
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #26 on: February 18, 2011, 12:51:46 AM »
and the funy thing is,,,the fella is 8% there lol crazy eh? this is 8% my friends,,not 9 and not 10 it is 8% you got that right,,he is in shape only water baloon like any other profesional and the fat is held in diff places due to severe abuse of insulin that make the fat from withinnnn the muscle,,this is what 8% with water look like,,you see abs? so body fat doensnt always go by how many abs you see and how blurr or not blurr they are,,it go by skin tecture,,and by solidfy of physiqe,,by hardness of physiqe from within and by how solid one look ,,especially when on chemicals ,,this is good lesson learned for my pupils 8% does not have to have abs showing cut ane clear,,it can be blurred and only line show when flexed ,,and over all mid seperation that is also not completely clear cut,,

gh15 approved

interesting..since bodyfat is measured by skin fold unless hydrostatically determined..which is rarely done.

i..e skinfolds have nothing to do with visceral fat..and visceral fat lies beneath the muscles so they - the muscles- would still be visible.

once again you talk a load of shit... but that's standard MO for you by now...anyone with half a brain can see it- so lucky for you 3/4 of GB.com believe everything you write.

you'd last not 5 minutes in a room with knowledgeable athletes..which is y u post at a dumb ass forum- it strokes your ego.

hope this helps you to narrow down your psychological issues.

magicuser

  • Guest
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #27 on: February 18, 2011, 01:00:21 AM »
Zane was and is a monument to what is great about bodybuilding.

If people wonder why no one gives a shit about bodybuilding and why no money is in the sport they need look no further than the fact that zane would lose to fatso in the mr O nowadays.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #28 on: February 18, 2011, 01:08:19 AM »
people who adore zanes physique are delusional. the only thing he had going for him was his abdominals and lat insertions by the obliques that are seen from the front just above the abs  on the outside of the body.  this is a homoerotic love for this region. if you take zane as a whole, disregarding the aesthetics of his cockly-reminiscent abdominals, he is not nearly as thick or aesthetic anywhere else. hes small!!!!! compared to top pros. those photos that have dramaitc shading, lighting, oiling, etc all on show day are creating a drastic illusion when shown by himself. stand someone like winklar on stage next to him, when winklars in shape mind you (even though hes not out of shape in the original photo he just holding water. you can still see visible seperation throughout entire body and hard abdominals, no visible soft fatty tissue..) winklar would PWN him. that being said, zane was a marvelous statue of a man and if god wanted to come into human form as a figure representative of his awesomness to a degree then zane would have been one of the top choices to go with, including all bodybuilders of all time. that being said, theres probably about 5,000 guys throughout history who could fulfill that kind of role.
 :o
so by your reasoning, every zane fan is a homo, or has homo tendencies? Im worried, cause zane is my favorite bber of all time...

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #29 on: February 18, 2011, 01:11:24 AM »
Zane was and is a monument to what is great about bodybuilding.

If people wonder why no one gives a shit about bodybuilding and why no money is in the sport they need look no further than the fact that zane would lose to fatso in the mr O nowadays.
zane would've evolved

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #30 on: February 18, 2011, 02:26:04 AM »
interesting..since bodyfat is measured by skin fold unless hydrostatically determined..which is rarely done.

i..e skinfolds have nothing to do with visceral fat..and visceral fat lies beneath the muscles so they - the muscles- would still be visible.

once again you talk a load of shit... but that's standard MO for you by now...anyone with half a brain can see it- so lucky for you 3/4 of GB.com believe everything you write.

you'd last not 5 minutes in a room with knowledgeable athletes..which is y u post at a dumb ass forum- it strokes your ego.

hope this helps you to narrow down your psychological issues.


and his muscle show very well,,infactr correction his body fat in the picture is 7-8% little under 8% ,,now to the other nonesense coments you made,,athletes in americana or anywhere else are all on hormones,,no hormones = no athlete,,the way you mesure fat mean shit it is how you look im mirror,,and how you look in mirror determine your body fat not some caliper that take into account water as fat and all the other dumb method that dont count for water and more importento skin tecture,,because skin has a lot to do with body fat ,,some fellas hold much water some les,,the fellas who hold much water sometime have lower bodyfat and you cant see it so you give them 10% when they are in reality already 8% ,, you need to know what you are talkin about when you come before me fella

gh15 approved
fallen angel

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #31 on: February 18, 2011, 02:31:03 AM »
infact,,you can have an indivual walking at 8% and when he sit he will have puff roled on the lower tummy that you as a dumb pupil will think is fat,,but the reality is that not much of it is fat and majority of it is water and cirulating estrogen that bring water,,thats why this fella walk around 4 weeks and sudenly he is iron hard flat ,,because it was not fat it was little fat and much water,,that go away moment you reduce dose ,,moment you adjust diet,,and moment you use duretic the right way,,

gh15 approved
fallen angel

roccoginge

  • Guest
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #32 on: February 18, 2011, 02:58:21 AM »
Seriously and I do not like Frank, At least he knew not to put a face like he was getting raped by everyone up the ass.  What is the deal with these chuches with the worst facail expression ever?

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #33 on: February 18, 2011, 01:35:46 PM »

and his muscle show very well,,infactr correction his body fat in the picture is 7-8% little under 8% ,,now to the other nonesense coments you made,,athletes in americana or anywhere else are all on hormones,,no hormones = no athlete,,the way you mesure fat mean shit it is how you look im mirror,,and how you look in mirror determine your body fat not some caliper that take into account water as fat and all the other dumb method that dont count for water and more importento skin tecture,,because skin has a lot to do with body fat ,,some fellas hold much water some les,,the fellas who hold much water sometime have lower bodyfat and you cant see it so you give them 10% when they are in reality already 8% ,, you need to know what you are talkin about when you come before me fella

gh15 approved


Back to your wild speculative bullshit again i see...
Trans Milkshake.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #34 on: February 18, 2011, 03:46:48 PM »
so by your reasoning, every zane fan is a homo, or has homo tendencies? Im worried, cause zane is my favorite bber of all time...
no, the people who think zane had a physique that could rival top pros of today are the ones with homo tendencies, or theyre just retarded

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #35 on: February 18, 2011, 03:51:07 PM »
no, the people who think zane had a physique that could rival top pros of today are the ones with homo tendencies, or theyre just retarded


Who thinks that? Zane wouldn't have broke 100lb's natural, he had good lines but the real aesthetic guys of his day were Nubret and Oliva.
Trans Milkshake.

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #36 on: February 18, 2011, 04:00:07 PM »
Zane looked good because he trained for 20+ years, got old, got maturity and in his day not many people trained.

Arnold made him look like a bitch because Arnold wanted to get big and then got conditioned. Kind of like Dorian at the 1992 Mr.O, he smashed them with size and dieted down more than he needed to so he was more ripped than them as well.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #37 on: February 18, 2011, 04:01:19 PM »

Who thinks that? Zane wouldn't have broke 100lb's natural, he had good lines but the real aesthetic guys of his day were Nubret and Oliva.
nd for one, along with a ton of others

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61581
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #38 on: February 18, 2011, 04:06:58 PM »

and his muscle show very well,,infactr correction his body fat in the picture is 7-8% little under 8% ,,now to the other nonesense coments you made,,athletes in americana or anywhere else are all on hormones,,no hormones = no athlete,,the way you mesure fat mean shit it is how you look im mirror,,and how you look in mirror determine your body fat not some caliper that take into account water as fat and all the other dumb method that dont count for water and more importento skin tecture,,because skin has a lot to do with body fat ,,some fellas hold much water some les,,the fellas who hold much water sometime have lower bodyfat and you cant see it so you give them 10% when they are in reality already 8% ,, you need to know what you are talkin about when you come before me fella

gh15 approved

Bodybuilders are not athletes in anyway shape or form. Like me, Disco Stu discredited your ass.

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #39 on: February 18, 2011, 07:06:28 PM »
Bodybuilders are not athletes in anyway shape or form. Like me, Disco Stu discredited your ass.

im surprized you make money out of training,,not only that you never helped anyone but you sit here and consistanly lie about shit with just being the slimey pops you are,,joseph you would not even see the number 1 7 0 on the scale if not for consistant use of hormones THAT INCLUDES THE HORMONE GH,,you are the typical wanna be who never made it,,local as we call it

gh15 approved
fallen angel

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #40 on: February 19, 2011, 02:11:22 AM »

Who thinks that? Zane wouldn't have broke 100lb's natural, he had good lines but the real aesthetic guys of his day were Nubret and Oliva.
zane in the 60's had a very good proportionate physique, was visibly bigger than in the late 70's, nowhere near as defined and ripped as in the late 70's/early 80's

honestly wouldnt know how reliant he was on aas, Id imagine as much as everyone else, but he could've gone the bigger route, he did get a significant bit heavier early on. I suppose he figured out the best look for himself, and ran with it

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #41 on: February 19, 2011, 03:44:18 AM »
frank couldnt be bigger,,he was 190 -200 at his maximum competing 185,, anything bigger and he would look bloofy ,,take close look at his hands,,his frame,, he was what you call average everything,,with hormones and training he achieved alot moree than many will ever achieve,,these days his size woundt mean shit,,but! if insulin was not introduced into bodybuild....he woudl still be today mr o worthy ,,he had much better physie than jason and 90 percent of top competitorsa today,,

size doesnt mean nothing if it is not conditioned and kept in symetry aka size in the right places,, if you have 50 lb in the midsection like jason have...nthing will helpo you there unless you look like ron colman but jason doesnt look like ron colman so he just win o based on the fact that the other morons behind him are no better as in abusing gh and insulin mainly,,if you can not have 32 inch waist when you hit 220 then any size you put on you is bloofiness,,i dont care how dense you are and how muscular you look ....if you dont have good shoulder to waist ratio you are not bodybuilder you are hormonized addict who bodybuild

take a look at the midsections of frank,,arnold,,serge,, sergio even,,haney,,labrada,,ray,,dexter,,its all tight and small,,take it and compare it to the jokes you see now day on stage and you get the whole bodybuild decline story

frank zane looked amazing,,if you can get to 190 at 4% and keep small waist and not use insulin and insulin gets out of bodybuild....you wil have chance at winning the  big one because anything past 200 on stage for a 5'9 has A LOT TO DO WITH SLIN AND GH ,,gh i good slin is NIGHT MARE FOR BODYBUILD,,the fellas on slin iin the late 2000 have no muscular size it is blown up size that has no solid foundation

gh15 approved
fallen angel

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #42 on: February 19, 2011, 04:19:25 AM »
zane was bigger, but not 4%..

I agree with 190% 4% at 5'9" 32in waist, everyone calls him a swimmer, if its so easy, then do it.

his physique appears attainable, but I have not seen it duplicated

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #43 on: February 19, 2011, 04:21:19 AM »
true adonis

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #44 on: February 19, 2011, 05:12:06 AM »


like anyone talking shit about zane can beat this

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #45 on: February 19, 2011, 05:27:05 AM »


like anyone talking shit about zane can beat this
exactly

one thing to have muscle, another to have proportion, another to be ripped, but the combo, as mentioned by gh15, of 4% at 5'9" 190lbs, 32" waist...

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #46 on: February 19, 2011, 06:51:02 AM »


like anyone talking shit about zane can beat this



Decent lines, seen better but Zane was one of the better Mr. O's.

Seen a good few guys that have surpassed his look, his genetics weren't great.

Reeves is far superior and he wasn't on half of what Frank was on.

Trans Milkshake.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32171
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #47 on: February 19, 2011, 06:56:09 AM »
frank couldnt be bigger,,he was 190 -200 at his maximum competing 185,, anything bigger and he would look bloofy ,,take close look at his hands,,his frame,, he was what you call average everything,,with hormones and training he achieved alot moree than many will ever achieve,,these days his size woundt mean shit,,but! if insulin was not introduced into bodybuild....he woudl still be today mr o worthy ,,he had much better physie than jason and 90 percent of top competitorsa today,,

size doesnt mean nothing if it is not conditioned and kept in symetry aka size in the right places,, if you have 50 lb in the midsection like jason have...nthing will helpo you there unless you look like ron colman but jason doesnt look like ron colman so he just win o based on the fact that the other morons behind him are no better as in abusing gh and insulin mainly,,if you can not have 32 inch waist when you hit 220 then any size you put on you is bloofiness,,i dont care how dense you are and how muscular you look ....if you dont have good shoulder to waist ratio you are not bodybuilder you are hormonized addict who bodybuild

take a look at the midsections of frank,,arnold,,serge,, sergio even,,haney,,labrada,,ray,,dexter,,its all tight and small,,take it and compare it to the jokes you see now day on stage and you get the whole bodybuild decline story

frank zane looked amazing,,if you can get to 190 at 4% and keep small waist and not use insulin and insulin gets out of bodybuild....you wil have chance at winning the  big one because anything past 200 on stage for a 5'9 has A LOT TO DO WITH SLIN AND GH ,,gh i good slin is NIGHT MARE FOR BODYBUILD,,the fellas on slin iin the late 2000 have no muscular size it is blown up size that has no solid foundation

gh15 approved
this is gh15 on top of his post game,dead on and true .summed up 3 decades of bbing.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #48 on: February 19, 2011, 09:13:00 AM »


Decent lines, seen better but Zane was one of the better Mr. O's.

Seen a good few guys that have surpassed his look, his genetics weren't great.

Reeves is far superior and he wasn't on half of what Frank was on.


reeves and grimek, 2 most overrated bbers ever

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Frank Zane: unparalleled symetry and proportions
« Reply #49 on: February 19, 2011, 09:57:18 AM »
exactly

one thing to have muscle, another to have proportion, another to be ripped, but the combo, as mentioned by gh15, of 4% at 5'8" 172lbs, 32" waist...

fixed