Author Topic: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences  (Read 825 times)

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« on: February 17, 2011, 09:27:55 AM »
Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
Young voters less supportive of his re-election than of his election in 2008
by Lydia Saad

PRINCETON, NJ -- U.S. registered voters are evenly split about whether they would back President Barack Obama for re-election in 2012 (45%) or "the Republican Party's candidate" (45%). This is similar to the results for the same question when it was asked a year ago.



Results from a parallel question Gallup asked during the presidencies of George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush show both of those presidents performing better on this re-elect measure at comparable points in their third years in office than Obama does today.

In polling from October 2001 through January 2004, George W. Bush consistently led an unnamed Democratic opponent, although by a shrinking margin as his job approval rating descended from a post-9/11 reading of 87% to the 50s and 60s. In February 2003, the point in Bush's presidency comparable to Obama's presidency today, Bush beat a generic Democrat among registered voters by 47% to 39%.

Gallup trends during George H.W. Bush's tenure were asked mostly during his third year in office, and show a similar descent in the elder Bush's standing vis-à-vis an unnamed Democrat. However, Bush's position switched from a strong lead -- 54% to 33% -- in February 1991, during the Persian Gulf War, to a slight deficit (39% to 43%) in early January 1992.

Most 2008 Demographic Support Patterns Carry Over to 2012

Women and nonwhites were important elements of Obama's winning 2008 coalition. Today, a wide gulf in political preferences remains between whites and nonwhites, with the majority of the former favoring the Republican candidate and a larger majority of the latter favoring Obama. Women are five percentage points more likely to say they would vote for Obama than are men (47% vs. 42%), similar to the seven-point gender gap in support for Obama in Gallup's final pre-election poll in 2008.

Younger voters are one element of Obama's original coalition that may not be intact heading into 2012. Gallup's 2008 pre-election poll found 63% of registered voters aged 18 to 34 choosing Obama, while 33% backed his Republican rival, John McCain. In addition, 53% of 35- to 54-year-old voters and 48% of those 55 and older supported Obama in that same poll. By contrast, today a bare majority of the 18- to 34-year-old group, 51%, and 43% of those 35 to 54 say they would vote to re-elect Obama.

Naturally, a large proportion of Democrats, 84%, support Obama for re-election, similar to the 88% of Republicans backing the Republican candidate.



Bottom Line

It's a political maxim that in elections with a sitting president running for re-election, voters are not so much choosing between two candidates as voting for or against the incumbent. That is not to say it won't matter whom the Republicans choose as their standard-bearer, but perhaps it matters slightly less than it would in an open election.

At this stage, as numerous Republican contenders begin the long process of wooing Republican delegates and voters, or consider jumping into the race, Gallup's generic re-elect measure indicates that their efforts would not be in vain, as fewer than half of registered voters are prepared to vote for Obama in 2012. Both George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush were better positioned for re-election at this point in their presidencies. However, given that one ultimately won and the other lost his re-election bid, it is clear that much can still change.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/146138/Nameless-Republican-Ties-Obama-2012-Election-Preferences.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=Politics

This guy better be praying to the heavens that the economy turns around.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2011, 09:31:36 AM »
it's insane to think we're in the middle of what is probably a depression...

he's shoving lib legislation down our month nonstop...

the whole world knows he probably wasn't born here...

the dollar is sinking like a fcking weight...


and 1 in 2 people just love the guy.   Seeing as he enjoyed a 53.9% approval rating on election day.... it's safe to say he's lost 1 in 25 voters since then.  Insane.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2011, 09:34:01 AM »
it's insane to think we're in the middle of what is probably a depression...

he's shoving lib legislation down our month nonstop...

the whole world knows he probably wasn't born here...

the dollar is sinking like a fcking weight...


and 1 in 2 people just love the guy.   Seeing as he enjoyed a 53.9% approval rating on election day.... it's safe to say he's lost 1 in 25 voters since then.  Insane.

It's impressive that a nameless figure ties this guy? He's doing such a bad job that a nameless person, whose agenda or stances on issues no one knows anything about, is tied with him. Keep trying to spin that. Swing and a miss.

Though it's not surprising at all given the number of people in this country who vote based on party lines. And then when we factor in people like you, who fawn over anything Obama does, even as this country sinks into the abyss, these numbers are to be expected.


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2011, 09:50:37 AM »
Obama has a floor of 45 percent no matter what.   

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2011, 10:04:01 AM »
the Repubs better hope that "nameless" is running

it seems like when they put the name of an actual Republican who might run in one of these polls that Obama usually wins

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2011, 10:31:04 AM »
Christie needs to run.  Christie daniels would easily beat obama.   

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2011, 10:35:50 AM »
I don't see this really shocking.

A lot of people subscribe to "The evil you know vs. the evil you don't know" type of thought process.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2011, 10:44:19 AM »
It's impressive that a nameless figure ties this guy? He's doing such a bad job that a nameless person, whose agenda or stances on issues no one knows anything about, is tied with him. Keep trying to spin that. Swing and a miss.

Though it's not surprising at all given the number of people in this country who vote based on party lines. And then when we factor in people like you, who fawn over anything Obama does, even as this country sinks into the abyss, these numbers are to be expected.

Reid was losing 75 to 25 to 'unnamed repub' in nevada.  we saw what happened there.

The fact it's not 75 to 25 means he is twice as popular as Reid, who barely won.

repubs shouldn't be celebrating here

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2011, 11:26:46 AM »
Reid was losing 75 to 25 to 'unnamed repub' in nevada.  we saw what happened there.

The fact it's not 75 to 25 means he is twice as popular as Reid, who barely won.

repubs shouldn't be celebrating here

Word is Nevada is a good representation of the entire US.  ::)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2011, 11:35:11 AM »
reid polled 75% IN nevada, right?

And he won with a majority IN nevada, right?

Somehow, his ass managed to swing 1 in 4 voters from hating him to punching in his name.  either that, or the repubs ran a stone cold wackjob against him

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2011, 11:37:25 AM »
Angle would have been much better than reid, but that's alright - we get the govt we vote for. 

Hhooppee and change bitches! 

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2011, 11:58:04 AM »
Angle would have been much better than reid, but that's alright - we get the govt we vote for. 
Hhooppee and change bitches! 

does that bother you comrade ?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #12 on: February 17, 2011, 12:04:04 PM »
does that bother you comrade ?


Sometimes considering lazy pieces of shit on welfare cancel out my vote and always vote for the madoff promising more free shit the rest of us have to pay for.

No representation without taxation! 

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2011, 12:05:20 PM »
reid polled 75% IN nevada, right?

And he won with a majority IN nevada, right?

Somehow, his ass managed to swing 1 in 4 voters from hating him to punching in his name.  either that, or the repubs ran a stone cold wackjob against him

I'm still failing to see the correlation of a state like Nevada to the rest of the US. Keep swinging.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2011, 12:09:21 PM »
Sometimes considering lazy pieces of shit on welfare cancel out my vote and always vote for the madoff promising more free shit the rest of us have to pay for.

No representation without taxation! 

that's what I thought comrade

keep up the good work

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2011, 12:11:34 PM »
that's what I thought comrade

keep up the good work

I'm honest about it, thats he difference between me and others.   

When I do vote fraud monitoring and see the armies of leeches in the bronx marching to the polls to vote themselves a pay raise, I want to puke.   

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #16 on: February 17, 2011, 12:16:29 PM »
I'm honest about it, thats he difference between me and others.   

When I do vote fraud monitoring and see the armies of leeches in the bronx marching to the polls to vote themselves a pay raise, I want to puke.   

congratulations on your honestly regarding your anti-American views

Kudos

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #17 on: February 17, 2011, 12:20:59 PM »
congratulations on your honestly regarding your anti-American views

Kudos


Sorry Straw -to there is nothing more un-american that marching to te polls time and time again to vote yourselves a pay raise at the expense of others.   

I guess we are different han way since you already said you like havng a system where people can stay home and not work and have oters pay for them.   

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66386
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2011, 05:47:53 PM »
Sounds like "anybody but Obama" sentiment.  I know a number of people who aren't going to make the mistake of voting for him again.