« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!  (Read 11705 times)

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #25 on: February 19, 2011, 01:53:20 PM »
Quote from: flexingtonsteele on February 19, 2011, 01:49:01 PM
look at most black pro athletes. id say 75-80% have bout the same type of calf development as dexter does.

he trains em.

but calves are 100% a genetics thing.
BS ,look at black bodybuilders from the 70's & 80's they all had good calves (except T Pearson) nowadays even white BB have shit  calves.
Logged

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #26 on: February 19, 2011, 02:14:09 PM »
Enormous delts. :o
Logged

Jaime

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
  • North Pole, fucking elves left, right and centre.
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #27 on: February 19, 2011, 02:18:57 PM »
Quote from: che on February 19, 2011, 01:45:23 PM
Looks like shit  , zero flow ,modern bodybuilding sucks.


This.

Looks like complete shit.
Logged
Trans Milkshake.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #28 on: February 19, 2011, 02:29:31 PM »
Quote from: Grant_Michaels on February 19, 2011, 01:31:19 PM
Dexter is off.... and how can a former My. Olympia be missing a complete bodypart?  CALVES???

How does he get away with this?????
Like he doesn't care anymore---like he has Chris Cormier Disease (being effed over for the last 2 yrs).
Logged

Dipadidu

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
  • any problems? work out!
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #29 on: February 19, 2011, 02:43:39 PM »
Quote from: Jaime on February 19, 2011, 02:18:57 PM

This.

Looks like complete shit.

*2

He is all arms without good arms...
Beside quads he looks like smashed assholes
Logged

Marty Champions

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36515
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #30 on: February 19, 2011, 03:05:32 PM »
how come no horseshoe on that dudes tricep, is it so pumped up with oil /steroids that it cannot contract into a horseshoe?
Logged
A

hench

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8440
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #31 on: February 19, 2011, 03:14:08 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2011, 01:40:59 PM
Looks SIKK !!!



























in one pose  :-\
was thinking the same thing
Logged

Schmoff

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #32 on: February 19, 2011, 03:31:29 PM »
what's up with the face, why do modern bodybuilders have to to make ugly faces on stage like they are shitting or having a stroke or something.  :-X
Logged

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #33 on: February 19, 2011, 04:31:27 PM »
Oily delts, weird looking and weak back, ugly inhuman looking all drugs type physique. Impressive nonetheless though. At first I thought the pic was photoshopped. HIs proportions are insane.
Logged

magicuser

  • Guest
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #34 on: February 19, 2011, 04:35:24 PM »
less time on quads delts more on chest n abs
Logged

littleguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #35 on: February 19, 2011, 04:52:08 PM »
Something night right with delts....light oil but not alot....or maybe shopped
Logged

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #36 on: February 19, 2011, 04:55:02 PM »

im amazed at how much size he has put on since the Nats but has kept his waistline tight.

im not talking about his stomach, but his torso in general.

you can even see how blocky centropani's waist line/ torso is becoming.
Logged
b

littleguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #37 on: February 19, 2011, 05:19:30 PM »
My moneys on this guy...

Jeez I havent competed in a few yrs now and I still look better and I'm a natty
Logged

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61583
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #38 on: February 19, 2011, 05:24:51 PM »
Logged

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41312
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #39 on: February 19, 2011, 07:19:59 PM »
This is even's show.  Dude looks like a top 6 mr. o contender.
Logged
7

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #40 on: February 19, 2011, 07:23:53 PM »
Quote from: The Coach on February 19, 2011, 05:24:51 PM
James Carville looking thick.
Ha! Excellent! It's the the economy, stupid!   ;D
Logged

Master Blaster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6610
  • Not sure if getbig full of trolls or trolls getbig
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #41 on: February 19, 2011, 08:19:49 PM »
check out the loss of definition in the mid-lower pec area combined with the sunken upper pec

thats some kind illusion happening there    ;)



pecs are a problem, looses thickness on front lat spread esp. traps
Logged

Master Blaster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6610
  • Not sure if getbig full of trolls or trolls getbig
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #42 on: February 19, 2011, 08:24:38 PM »
No homo x 2

See how the inner tie in of the lower pecs keep a soft puffy full quality despite a double bicep stretch ?

that a fucking cosmetic little application...very stealth



Logged

Master Blaster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6610
  • Not sure if getbig full of trolls or trolls getbig
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #43 on: February 19, 2011, 08:26:54 PM »
Quote from: Master Blaster on February 19, 2011, 08:24:38 PM
No homo x 2

See how the inner tie in of the lower pecs keep a soft puffy full quality despite a double bicep stretch ?

that a fucking cosmetic little application...very stealth





heres a comparison of pecs with less synthol

Logged

pedro01

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4800
  • Hello Hunior
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #44 on: February 19, 2011, 09:33:12 PM »
He's kept the abs tight & that hand has healed up nicely....

Logged

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #45 on: February 19, 2011, 09:38:02 PM »
Quote from: littleguns on February 19, 2011, 05:19:30 PM
My moneys on this guy...

Jeez I havent competed in a few yrs now and I still look better and I'm a natty
::) your delusional if you think you look remotely similar
Logged

20inch calves

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4740
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #46 on: February 19, 2011, 09:40:06 PM »
Quote from: che on February 19, 2011, 01:53:20 PM
BS ,look at black bodybuilders from the 70's & 80's they all had good calves (except T Pearson) nowadays even white BB have shit  calves.


sorry you are wrong. white bbers with good calves...evan, ben p, eric frankhouser, jay, should i go on
Logged
irongearco.com

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #47 on: February 19, 2011, 10:02:24 PM »
Quote from: flexingtonsteele on February 19, 2011, 01:49:01 PM
look at most black pro athletes. id say 75-80% have bout the same type of calf development as dexter does.

he trains em.

but calves are 100% a genetics thing.

Racist post reported. Stereotypes are hurtful.
Logged

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #48 on: February 20, 2011, 02:16:46 AM »
Quote from: Grant_Michaels on February 19, 2011, 01:31:19 PM
Dexter is off.... and how can a former My. Olympia be missing a complete bodypart?  CALVES???

How does he get away with this?????



Seems like once they hit 40 the legs are the first things to go.
Logged
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #49 on: February 20, 2011, 03:52:12 AM »
He looked better last year.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »