Author Topic: Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!  (Read 11704 times)

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16153
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Flex Pro - Pakulski looks SIKK!
« on: February 19, 2011, 12:55:15 PM »
 :o


Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2011, 12:55:59 PM »
damn

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29921
  • Expunged
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2011, 12:56:15 PM »
Reverse-Palumboism?

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2011, 12:57:17 PM »
Damn is right.
a

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2011, 12:57:25 PM »
tank u jesus

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2011, 12:57:38 PM »
In before hazbin posts the photo of himself and him.


And oh, holy FUCK, I wonder what the waistline / thigh measure is. during vacuum, leg looks bigger

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #6 on: February 19, 2011, 12:58:36 PM »

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16932
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2011, 01:00:10 PM »
Yeah, too bad about the middleweight back.


spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2011, 01:00:47 PM »
why do getbig resize the fucking photos! (right clikc and Show photo)

his back wasn't as impressive, and needs to ger harder, crazy hard from the front though

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2011, 01:02:53 PM »




spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2011, 01:03:01 PM »
"big" dan hill looks like soft poop hahaha

Boost

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2011, 01:03:11 PM »
Crazy from the front,

BUT......


those delts look full of oil from the back. No separation. He's pretty smooth from behind

tendonitis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2011, 01:03:24 PM »


yikes, delts look a little "full"
back is way behind his front

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16153
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2011, 01:03:36 PM »
Palumbo says Wolf and Centopani are spot on, while Dex is considerable off. Could be interesting.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2011, 01:07:07 PM »
Holy *@&^$*(@&#^$*(@&#^$*(&

Big Ben looks sick

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2011, 01:12:22 PM »
Looks very good - big and full, although could maybe do with being a tad drier.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83466
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2011, 01:40:59 PM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83466
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2011, 01:41:58 PM »
Dexter is off.... and how can a former My. Olympia be missing a complete bodypart?  CALVES???

How does he get away with this?????

Blade doesn't look so sharp and Ronnie was missing calves for his entire career nothing new

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2011, 01:43:31 PM »


top 3 from the front.

but his lack of a back/arms and being so soft from behind really hurts him.

Should be about 6th or so.

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2011, 01:44:51 PM »
Dexter is off.... and how can a former My. Olympia be missing a complete bodypart?  CALVES???

How does he get away with this?????

grant take it ez on dex's calves.

sometimes its hard for us brotha's to grow em :)

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2011, 01:45:23 PM »
:o



Looks like shit  , zero flow ,modern bodybuilding sucks.

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2011, 01:47:00 PM »
grant take it ez on dex's calves.

sometimes its hard for us brotha's to grow em :)
Yeah, usually they don't grow if you don't train them.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2011, 01:48:22 PM »
Amazing 3-D lower body. Solid enough upper-body, especially from the front, but the underwhelming arms are a glaringly obvious weakness. That's a long way to come to lose it at the finish line.  :-\

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2011, 01:49:01 PM »
Yeah, usually they don't grow if you don't train them.

look at most black pro athletes. id say 75-80% have bout the same type of calf development as dexter does.

he trains em.

but calves are 100% a genetics thing.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Pakulski looks SIKK!
« Reply #24 on: February 19, 2011, 01:50:30 PM »
 :o