Author Topic: elife310, a 6 week body transformation (Read 4196 times)

dj181 · « **on:** February 27, 2011, 12:28:48 PM »

He's a dude on youtube that has posted his 6 week body transformation vids, and over the course of 6 weeks he gained 18 quality pounds, which he claims were all muscle. Discuss

chaos · « **Reply #1 on:** February 27, 2011, 12:29:38 PM »

Quote from: dj181 on February 27, 2011, 12:28:48 PM

He's a dude on youtube that has posted his 6 week body transformation vids, and over the course of 6 weeks he gained 18 quality pounds, which he claims were all muscle. Discuss

Pics, video, links?

Fuckin wanker.

Boost · « **Reply #2 on:** February 27, 2011, 12:33:06 PM »

There is a video of Jay Cutler jerking off his dog "Scraps" on youtube somewhere.

Search "Bestiality meets brawn"..... Hope you can find it.

Discuss.

Obvious Gimmick · « **Reply #3 on:** February 27, 2011, 12:34:40 PM »

is he claiming "natrual" status? age of dude? more info please. but just from the hip, sounds like total bullshit

BB · « **Reply #4 on:** February 27, 2011, 12:50:18 PM »

.

That?

This is much better, if you like watching muscular black folks-

.

dj181 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 27, 2011, 12:50:48 PM »

Yeah, he claims natural status, and he appears to be in his mid to late 20's.

Mr Nobody · « **Reply #6 on:** February 28, 2011, 01:31:17 AM »

All genetics and climbing trees.

GroinkTropin · « **Reply #7 on:** February 28, 2011, 01:33:41 AM »

Zero drugs in that guy. Making newbie gains, love to see how he deals with stagnation when his body hasn't gained a lb in 6 weeks after it adapts haha. He has an ok build, nothing wrong with it. Respect.

devilsmile · « **Reply #8 on:** February 28, 2011, 01:37:20 AM »

Quote from: BB on February 27, 2011, 12:50:18 PM

.

that video is inspirational as HELL!!!

mike tyson at his best..... was/is the best

GroinkTropin · « **Reply #9 on:** February 28, 2011, 01:55:12 AM »

Quote from: devilsmile on February 28, 2011, 01:37:20 AM

that video is inspirational as HELL!!!

mike tyson at his best..... was/is the best

GOAT no doubt@!

dj181 · « **Reply #10 on:** February 28, 2011, 04:32:45 AM »

THOMAS HEARNS>mike tyson

devilsmile · « **Reply #11 on:** February 28, 2011, 04:37:37 AM »

Quote from: dj181 on February 28, 2011, 04:32:45 AM

THOMAS HEARNS>mike tyson

keep dreaming buddy boy

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #12 on:** February 28, 2011, 04:49:35 AM »

Quote from: devilsmile on February 28, 2011, 04:37:37 AM

keep dreaming buddy boy

It's pretty hard to compare different weight categories in boxing. But Hearns hasfaced much better opposition then what Tyson faced. It's not even close: Hearns won the title in 5 different categories. The only thing that somehow makes him look less than what he really was is that he got lost in the shuffle with guys like Hagler, Leonard, Duran (which he knocked out impressively BTW), etc....

devilsmile · « **Reply #13 on:** February 28, 2011, 04:54:26 AM »

Quote from: MORTALCOIL on February 28, 2011, 04:49:35 AM

It's pretty hard to compare different weight categories in boxing. But Hearns hasfaced much better opposition then what Tyson faced. It's not even close: Hearns won the title in 5 different categories. The only thing that somehow makes him look less than what he really was is that he got lost in the shuffle with guys like Hagler, Leonard, Duran (which he knocked out impressively BTW), etc....

yeah if you want to talk like that, but it's all conversation, he doesn't come close to mikes speed and explosiveness.

You can talk all you want about differend categorys. Mike didn't have to do that. It sounds good in your CV that you have done 300 differend jobs but after you graduate and go to your first real job interview, all the little 300 previous jobs mean shit. It just looks cool.

noone has moved as fast as mike along with explosive power, that's why I love mike. His jab was most boxers best power bomb, lol. Mike moved like a street fighter video game character, boom boom, speed and power and super accuracy.

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #14 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:02:45 AM »

Quote from: devilsmile on February 28, 2011, 04:54:26 AM

yeah if you want to talk like that, but it's all conversation, he doesn't come close to mikes speed and explosiveness.

You can talk all you want about differend categorys. Mike didn't have to do that. It sounds good in your CV that you have done 300 differend jobs but after you graduate and go to your first real job interview, all the little 300 previous jobs mean shit. It just looks cool.

noone has moved as fast as mike along with explosive power, that's why I love mike. His jab was most boxers best power bomb, lol. Mike moved like a street fighter video game character, boom boom, speed and power and super accuracy.

Actually, Hearns was known for his speed (his hands were incredibly fast) and punch which he's height/weight ratio made it hard to imagine. Tyson was very fast for a Heavyweight which is whole different story (and that was also because he was much shorter than most Heavyweights). You have to compare things that are comparable. I don't think you've seen Hearns fight that much. i love prime time Tyson but the fact is that he didn't face that good a competition.

devilsmile · « **Reply #15 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:07:33 AM »

Quote from: MORTALCOIL on February 28, 2011, 05:02:45 AM

Actually, Hearns was known for his speed (his hands were incredibly fast) and punch which he's height/weight ratio made it hard to imagine. Tyson was very fast for a Heavyweight which is whole different story (and that was also because he was much shorter than most Heavyweights). You have to compare things that are comparable. I don't think you've seen Hearns fight that much. i love prime time Tyson but the fact is that he didn't face that good a competition.

comparable? Then you can't mention a chimapnzee like thomas fighting against a gorilla who is just as fast and agile like mike.

who cares about mesures? Reminds me how people allways diss buakaw that; "Yeah but buakaw wasn't injured so it was easyer", yeah, because he is the better conditioned athlete so that's why he's not injured, doh

Mike tyson was short, big, fast, powerfull and accurate = makes him the overall better athlete and boxer.

but I'm a fanboy here, though.

dj181 · « **Reply #16 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:07:59 AM »

Hagler vs. Hearns, the best 3 rounds in boxing FACT

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #17 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:09:41 AM »

Quote from: dj181 on February 28, 2011, 05:07:59 AM

Hagler vs. Hearns, the best 3 rounds in boxing FACT

I agree. By far, the best fight i've ever seen. Hagler was a monster. Got tricked into that so-called fight against Leonard.

devilsmile · « **Reply #18 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:10:13 AM »

Quote from: dj181 on February 28, 2011, 05:07:59 AM

Hagler vs. Hearns, the best 3 rounds in boxing FACT

yeah it looks cool when 2 lesser creatures fight... mike could fight them both at the same time, they would be like; "Not fair, you hit me in my arm, my arm broke, I would win other wise"

mike has also been their size, and he was as fast as he was in his heavy weight bouts, think about that... have you watched mikes amateur videos? Skinnyer physique, lightning fast.

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #19 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:15:43 AM »

Once again, there's a reason for weight categories. And a reason why people don't only watch Heavyweights (actually nowadays nobody watches them). Tyson was a great athlete at one point but he never faced great boxers at their peak (Holmes was in for the money and that's the biggest name he ever faced). Then he got his ass kicked by Holyfield and Lewis. So if you want to compare: Ali, Frazier, Foreman: all better than Ali.

devilsmile · « **Reply #20 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:17:59 AM »

Quote from: MORTALCOIL on February 28, 2011, 05:15:43 AM

Once again, there's a reason for weight categories. And a reason why people don't only watch Heavyweights (actually nowadays nobody watches them). Tyson was a great athlete at one point but he never faced great boxers at their peak (Holmes was in for the money and that's the biggest name he ever faced). Then he got his ass kicked by Holyfield and Lewis. So if you want to compare: Ali, Frazier, Foreman: all better than Ali.

if you want to be impartial and one sided in your ideals, you would admit that when mike lost he truly was fucked in the head and his life was a pain while the opponents you mentioned were more hungry, mike def was not in those fights.

You can also say that the reason mike didn't face much competition was because he was just better. Like a strong trained pitbull fighting against a german shepherd... the german shepherd is strong and agile but... it doesn't matter at that point.

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #21 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:21:51 AM »

Sure, but that's also part of being a champion and Mike collapsed. He failed at being a real champion and when he had to face a solid opposition, he showed he lacked what was needed to make a comeback. Which guys like Ali (against Foreman for example), Frazier hiself in his third fight agaisnt Ali or even Foreman coming back as a ridiculous blob of shit did still managing to win back a title (and also facing Holyfield without getting knocked out or bitting his ear). Tyson may have been (and that only something you can imagine) the best ever during a split second. But he didn't show the consistency that true champions have.

dj181 · « **Reply #22 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:21:58 AM »

I'll be completely honest here, I may be a little bit biased with these middleweight and welterweight "twinks" since I can readily identify with them being a 160 pound twink myself

Yeah, Tyson had amazing speed for a heavyweight, and speaking of great white hopes Andrew Golota, da Polish blockhead, was pretty fast handed also, and what made it even more amazing is dat he is a white dude. It's just too bad dat da dude was a nutjob. If he could have kept a clear and sane head them he would have went much further, coz he certainly had the physical talent.

devilsmile · « **Reply #23 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:24:09 AM »

Quote from: dj181 on February 28, 2011, 05:21:58 AM

I'll be completely honest here, I may be a little bit biased with these middleweight and welterweight "twinks" since I can readily identify with them being a 160 pound twink myself Yeah, Tyson had amazing speed for a heavyweight, and speaking of great white hopes Andrew Golota, da Polish blockhead, was pretty fast handed also, and what made it even more amazing is dat he is a white dude. It's just too bad dat da dude was a nutjob. If he could have kept a clear and sane head them he would have went much further, coz he certainly had the physical talent.

yeah, that's what I'm saying.. mike was very sensitive, when his mentor died, part mike died and he was never the same and then he started to mix with women, power games and couldn't focuse

MORTALCOIL · « **Reply #24 on:** February 28, 2011, 05:26:35 AM »

Quote from: devilsmile on February 28, 2011, 05:17:59 AM

if you want to be impartial and one sided in your ideals, you would admit that when mike lost he truly was fucked in the head and his life was a pain while the opponents you mentioned were more hungry, mike def was not in those fights.

You can also say that the reason mike didn't face much competition was because he was just better. Like a strong trained pitbull fighting against a german shepherd... the german shepherd is strong and agile but... it doesn't matter at that point.

Nope, look at the names: Berbick? Pinklon Thomas? Frazier's son? An out-of-retirement Spinks (or Holmes)? The best he fought in his good ole' days was tony Tucker who went all the way despite breaking his hand early in the fight. Then came Buster Douglas and we all know what happened.