Author Topic: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??  (Read 4617 times)

Bam-bam

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4501
Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« on: March 06, 2011, 11:57:07 AM »
Since judges all seem to care about nowadays is mass and condition... Kovacs there is huge, hard and dry, and no missing body parts. Would make Branch look like a kid in the mass departament and the condition is there too!

Also, his physique flows so much better than Warrens here - actually, Warrens physique doesnt flow at all so thats a mute point.



mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2011, 12:01:32 PM »
why not ..
all he needs to be is big and conditioned... :-\
bbing is dead
all drugs..
choice is an illusion

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2011, 12:08:43 PM »
no he burned out all of his receptors, he is the typical fellow that weighs tons of weight but looks small on stage next to a much lighter bber.

Bam-bam

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4501
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2011, 12:09:36 PM »
no he burned out all of his receptors, he is the typical fellow that weighs tons of weight but looks small on stage next to a much lighter bber.

Im talking about this circa 95 version

slate

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1804
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2011, 12:53:38 PM »
kovacs looks too good here to be a contender on the ASC 11.

Now a few years later during his terminal  palumbo-stage, then is when he would have been able to go toe to toe with branch

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2011, 02:25:25 PM »
Damn he looks great right there

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2011, 04:39:42 PM »
that was when kovacs turned pro.

he looked great.

but he went over board and ruined himself.

if he competed as a pro like that, would have done pretty well.
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41300
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2011, 07:32:15 PM »
Since judges all seem to care about nowadays is mass and condition... Kovacs there is huge, hard and dry, and no missing body parts. Would make Branch look like a kid in the mass departament and the condition is there too!

Also, his physique flows so much better than Warrens here - actually, Warrens physique doesnt flow at all so thats a mute point.





Gregory looks awesome in that video.
7

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17201
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2011, 07:50:14 PM »
Since when is Kovacs 6ft 5?

disco_stu

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4953
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2011, 08:06:09 PM »
Since judges all seem to care about nowadays is mass and condition... Kovacs there is huge, hard and dry, and no missing body parts. Would make Branch look like a kid in the mass departament and the condition is there too!

Also, his physique flows so much better than Warrens here - actually, Warrens physique doesnt flow at all so thats a mute point.




the word is "moot" dipshit.
hope this helps.

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2011, 09:42:02 PM »
the word is "moot" dipshit.
hope this helps.

 ;D  ;D  ;D

I noticed that too but I didn't say anything about it so it's a mute point.

PS - Greg's physique did decline from the time of that video although I should point out that even as late as 2000-2002 or beyond, he was big and freaky and could draw a large crowd at nutrition stores.  He was a guy who would walk around at 385 pounds at around 10% body fat.  Some said he was literally a wall of muscle.
Bodybuilding Pro.com

magicuser

  • Guest
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #11 on: March 07, 2011, 12:25:41 AM »
Since judges all seem to care about nowadays is mass and condition... Kovacs there is huge, hard and dry, and no missing body parts. Would make Branch look like a kid in the mass departament and the condition is there too!

Also, his physique flows so much better than Warrens here - actually, Warrens physique doesnt flow at all so thats a mute point.





wow that is one BIG guy

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19935
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2011, 12:29:30 AM »
He could have won the bikini class. First prize: year supply of towels.

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2011, 12:30:18 AM »
6 foot 2... On a good day

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #14 on: March 07, 2011, 12:31:08 AM »
Check out the guy with the ponytail next to Kovacs. Talking about lean face.

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17201
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2011, 12:33:45 AM »
Check out the guy with the ponytail next to Kovacs. Talking about lean face.


Bam-bam

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4501
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #16 on: March 07, 2011, 04:58:38 AM »
Hey retards, now a brazilian is going to teach you some basic english lessons!!

mute   /myut/  Show Spelled
[myoot]  Show IPA
adjective, mut·er, mut·est,  noun, verb, mut·ed, mut·ing. 
–adjective
1. silent; refraining from speech or utterance.
2. not emitting or having sound of any kind.
3. incapable of speech; dumb.
4. (of letters) silent; not pronounced.
5. Law . (of a person who has been arraigned) making no plea or giving an irrelevant response when arraigned, or refusing to stand trial (used chiefly in the phrase to stand mute ).

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5810
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2011, 05:08:13 AM »
Oh dear... The moops bubble boy!

dogbowl

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Team anyone except heath
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #18 on: March 07, 2011, 05:13:15 AM »
Hey retards, now a brazilian is going to teach you some basic english lessons!!

He's right though. It is "moot point"

hench

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8420
Re: Could this Kovacs have taken the 2011s Arnold??
« Reply #19 on: March 07, 2011, 05:24:36 AM »
Kovacs looked okay there but his chest was very droopy and saggy looking