Author Topic: Democratic party=slimeballs  (Read 3194 times)

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Democratic party=slimeballs
« on: March 08, 2011, 05:06:28 AM »
CBO: Senate Dems Cut Only $8.7 billion to House GOP's $61 billion
by Trish Turner | March 07, 2011

It's getting so these days it takes a degree in higher order math to wrestle the real deficit impact from all the proposed spending cuts and political spin flying around Congress. The Congressional Budget Office revealed Monday yet another twist of accounting, leaving Senate Democrats with less than previously thought when it comes to deficit reduction when compared with what House Republicans approved.

This time, while Senate Democrats and the White House are touting another $6.5 billion in spending cuts in the midst of their fight with congressional Republicans over how best to reduce the deficit, CBO indicates in a 513-page report to Congress obtained by Fox that nearly $2 billion of that is emergency funding. That is - spending that is not included in the budget and, therefore, does not affect the deficit.

An aide to Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, did not dispute the analysis of his boss' bill but merely pointed out that the goal of the chairman was to cut spending by $51 billion, when the President's current budget, which never passed Congress, is included as the base. But $41 billion of that was never enacted, so experts do not see that as a real cut. Current discretionary spending remains frozen at 2010 levels.

Likewise, Republicans really cut $61 billion and not $100 billion, as they tried to advertise. They, too, sought to use the President's current budget as the base from which they started to cut.

But if you compare apples to apples, the Republicans have cut $61 billion; Democrats have now proposed cutting only $8.7 billion, when the CBO analysis is taken into account. Republicans did not appear to count emergency spending in their $61 billion measure, though it did contain such cuts, as well.

Both measures are likely to be voted on Tuesday afternoon in the Senate, and both are expected to fall well short of the 60 votes needed for passage.

And if the goal in all of this wrangling over short-term federal government funding is actually to reduce the deficit, then CBO says we must use the figure $4.7 billion, not $6.5 billion. If the goal is merely to cut spending, then the Democrats have done so. And if the goal is to drive reporters who cover Congress mad, then - mission accomplished.

 
http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/03/07/cbo-senate-dems-cut-only-87-billion-house-gops-61-billion#

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2011, 05:10:03 AM »
These treasonous scumbags ad madoffs are basically saying no cuts of any nature will be acceptable to them. 

As bad as the GOP is, and yes they suck, they pale in comparison to the treachery and deceit of these far left criminals and thieves.     

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2011, 05:17:40 AM »
240 questions the Republicans' motives. He should be looking at what the Democrats are trying to do. They are not serious about curtailing the deficit or the government spending.

Just look at the proposals by both parties:

But if you compare apples to apples, the Republicans have cut $61 billion; Democrats have now proposed cutting only $8.7 billion, when the CBO analysis is taken into account. Republicans did not appear to count emergency spending in their $61 billion measure, though it did contain such cuts, as well.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2011, 05:33:37 AM »
Then on top of all that there is this:

GOP Lawmakers Target $105B in Spending Found in Health Care Law (Obama lies then steals billions)
Fox News ^ | 3/8/2011 | fox news





Republican lawmakers are up in arms over what they say was $105 billion in unannounced spending tucked into Democrats' legislation overhauling the nation's health care system.


Rep. Michele Bachmann, in an interview Monday with Fox News' Sean Hannity, suggested that this spending was one reason Obama and congressional Democratic leaders were in such a hurry to pass the legislation in late 2009.

“We didn’t get the bill until a literally couple of hours before we were supposed to vote on it,” Bachmann told Hannity, saying that the spending was split up and put in different portions of the proposed legislation.

The conservative Heritage Foundation uncovered the spending, which had been tallied by the Congressional Research Service and Congressional Budget Office.

It falls under the heading of mandatory spending, because it is controlled by laws other than annual appropriations acts. Such mandatory funds could remain available for the Obama administration to spend even if Republicans manage to defund the health care law.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2011, 05:34:52 AM »
And this:



Double counting $500 billion!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2011, 05:38:11 AM »
And this:



Double counting $500 billion!

I want just one kneepadding cun* to defend that. 

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2011, 05:55:07 AM »
I want just one kneepadding cun* to defend that. 

Ah. They won't defend it. They will just claim that Republicans aren't doing anything just because after only 2 months of controlling the house they have not been able to roll back all the damage done by Democrats for the past 4 years. As if the Reps have a veto proof majority. Yeah, lets blame the Republicans but turn a blind eye to the Democrats who continue to try to push trough more spending bills, coming up with the stupid high-speed railway plan, double counting $500 billion in the health care package and lying about how its going to lower costs and the deficit, Dems in the Senate blocking any bill by the Reps in the House and even if Dems and Reps were to come to an agreement the retard in the oval office will veto any bill that reduces or withholds funding for any of his beloved entitlement social programs.  Lets just ignore all of that and just blame Republicans. That's right!!!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2011, 06:08:02 AM »
Ah. They won't defend it. They will just claim that Republicans aren't doing anything just because after only 2 months of controlling the house they have not been able to roll back all the damage done by Democrats for the past 4 years. As if the Reps have a veto proof majority. Yeah, lets blame the Republicans but turn a blind eye to the Democrats who continue to try to push trough more spending bills, coming up with the stupid high-speed railway plan, double counting $500 billion in the health care package and lying about how its going to lower costs and the deficit, Dems in the Senate blocking any bill by the Reps in the House and even if Dems and Reps were to come to an agreement the retard in the oval office will veto any bill that reduces or withholds funding for any of his beloved entitlement social programs.  Lets just ignore all of that and just blame Republicans. That's right!!!

Did yo see my thread with conrad saying Obamacare is a ponzi scheme?

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2011, 06:10:38 AM »
Dario you're just being negative because Obama and the Democrats have failed to properly "frame the issue" and communicate effectively with individuals such as yourself.

It's the media's fault really.

The double counting you referenced is just the chair of HHS demonstrating how great Obamacare will be for America. It's so wonderful that its funding supersedes the laws of the universe. Just by being positive and having the audacity of hope, 500 million dollars can be counted twice with no accounting irregularities or mathematical errors.

You also have no right to call the Obama administration unamerican. Being American means feeling good about yourself all the time without getting bogged down in pesky details like math or logic. That's for uncool people and republicans.


dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2011, 06:37:56 AM »
Dario you're just being negative because Obama and the Democrats have failed to properly "frame the issue" and communicate effectively with individuals such as yourself.


Don't you just love that talking point? Dems believe they know what is best for all of us.

whork25

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1653
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #10 on: March 08, 2011, 07:09:20 AM »
Don't you just love that talking point? Dems believe they know what is best for all of us.

And repub dont..??

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #11 on: March 08, 2011, 07:36:43 AM »
And repub dont..??

When did you hear a Republican claim that they need to keep explaining their legislations to the American people until they accept it?

Republican party has its flaws and has made errors. But, now they are trying to cut back on as much government waste as possible. Who is standing in their way?  Hint: It isn't the majority of citizens.

Republicans are not saints, but Democrats, AT THIS POINT, are far worse and more dangerous. Just look at what is going on in Wisconsin. Who is running away from facing the problem of state bankruptcy and the economic burden of public unions and refusing to try to solve those problems? It isn't the Republicans.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #12 on: March 08, 2011, 10:10:23 AM »
Dems: Congress's Styrofoam cups could cause cancer
By Jordan Fabian - 03/08/11 11:04 AM ET
  http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/148027-dems-congress-styrofoam-cups-could-cause-cancer

A group of Democrats complain Styrofoam cups in the House cafeteria could contain carcinogens.



________________________ ___________



In a letter to Speaker John Boehner (Ohio) and other Republican leaders, the nine Democrats say the Styrofoam cups and other dining materials could hold chemical components that could cause cancer. The Democrats are upset with the switch to Styrofoam from recyclable materials put into place when Democrats ran the House.

The letter asks Boehner to reconsider the switch away from recyclable to polystyrene-based foam containers, and warns that the health of visitors to the Capitol could be compromised.


"The irresponsibility of the decision to use polystyrene foam without considering other options is all the more egregious because the cafeteria is not merely used by House members and our staffers," the lawmakers write. "The health of constituents and visitors to the Hill who eat in the cafeteria will be impacted by this short-sighted decision."

The change to Styrofoam caused a stir among some staffers and Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill late last month, when the recyclable material preferred by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was replaced. Lawmakers mostly raised concerns about Styrofoam's impact on the environment.


Republicans have downplayed the harmful health and environmental effects of Styrofoam and said that the composting program in place under Pelosi cost too much money and did not do enough to bring down energy consumption.


But the Democratic letter cited toxicology studies that claim polystyrene contains "possible human carcinogens" and could present other health challenges, such as headaches, hearing loss, central nervous system dysfunction and difficulty sleeping.


"Eliminating polystyrene-related health impacts will result in fewer lost work days and lower heath insurance costs for the House and its staff," the lawmakers write. "This benefit alone should outweigh any cost savings from using polystyrene containers."


The "Dear Colleague" notice soliciting signatures from other lawmakers, which was circulated by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), is titled "Cancer Causing Cups in the Cafeteria?"


The other lawmakers who signed the letter are Reps. James Moran (D-Va.), George Miller (D-Calif.), Mike Honda (D-Calif.), Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), Susan Davis (D-Calif.) and Chellie Pingree (D-Maine).

Here is the full letter from the nine Democrats:


Speaker John Boehner                                                  Majority Leader Eric Cantor

1011 Longworth House Office Building                   303 Cannon House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515                                                   Washington, DC 20515

 

Chairman Dan Lungren

House Administration Committee

2313 Rayburn House Office Building

Washington, DC 20515

 

March 11, 2011

Dear Speaker Boehner, Majority Leader Cantor, and Chairman Lungren:

We are writing to express our deep concern with the current choice to use polystyrene  products, commonly known as “styrofoam,”[1][1] in the House of Representatives cafeterias. While we appreciate that the CAO is working to reduce costs, there are significant health and environmental risks associated with styrofoam, as well as additional costs associated with increased waste removal. These external costs should be considered in making the decision for cafeteria products; the desire to save a few pennies should never come at the expense of jeopardizing staff, members and visitors’ health.  Over 20 years ago, McDonalds and other fast food restaurants replaced polystyrene foam with recyclable and paperboard containers. More than 100 cities have also chosen to ban polystyrene foam for health and environmental reasons. Adopting the same standard is the least we can do.

We have numerous concerns about the safety of polystyrene foam products.  Polystyrene foam products can leach their component chemicals into the foods and liquids they contain.  Leaching of styrene and benzene is documented with nearly 40 years of scientific evidence, as are the resulting negative health impacts.[2][2]  During the manufacturing process, acute short-term exposure to styrene can result in irritation to the eyes, nose, throat, and mucous membranes as well as gastrointestinal effects.

Over time, exposure to the styrene that leaches into food and liquids can cause extensive health effects, including fatigue, headaches, hearing loss, central nervous system dysfunction, difficulty sleeping, as well as low platelet and hemoglobin values and chromosomal abnormalities.[3][3][4][4]  The International Association for Research on Cancer classified styrene as a potential human carcinogen. Eliminating polystyrene-related health impacts will result in fewer lost work days and lower heath insurance costs for the House and its staff.  This benefit alone should outweigh any cost savings from using polystyrene containers.

Polystyrene foam products continue to threaten public health and the environment after they are used and discarded.  Polystyrene is not easily or cheaply recycled, and there are significant health and environmental impacts from the 25 million polystyrene foam cups that are thrown away per year. When disposed of in landfills, products made of polystyrene take over half a millennium to biodegrade. While in landfills, polystyrene chemicals can leach into groundwater, jeopardizing water quality. The safe incineration of polystyrene foam requires extremely high heat in specialized plants.  Incineration at normal heat levels releases over 90 different hazardous chemicals, polluting the air quality of those communities surrounding the waste plants and burdening them with increased health risks and costs.

Although we strongly support efforts to reduce costs in the federal government, it is our understanding that the cafeteria operations generate profits for the House – an estimated $879,000 for 2010. Any costs associated with composting or any of the other environmentally sound options were always meant to be offset by these profits. Those of us who are concerned about the health and safety of Members, staff and visitors feel that this is certainly a worthwhile use for these proceeds.
                       
The irresponsibility of the decision to use polystyrene foam without considering other options is all the more egregious because the cafeteria is not merely used by House members and our staffers. The health of constituents and visitors to the Hill who eat in the cafeteria will be impacted by this short-sighted decision.  We urge you to bear in mind our responsibility to protect the health and welfare of the American public, now and in future generations, and to reconsider the decision to use Polystyrene foam in our cafeteria.

Sincerely,




________________________ ___________


haha ha ha h


DEMOCRAT =  PUSSY 

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2011, 10:36:31 AM »
Oh man. Styrofoam cups. Priorities. Priorities.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2011, 10:38:43 AM »
Oh man. Styrofoam cups. Priorities. Priorities.


If that wasnt in The Hill i thought it would have to be a joke.  But this is the dem party, so it is to be expected. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2011, 10:42:51 AM »
This time, while Senate Democrats and the White House are touting another $6.5 billion in spending cuts in the midst of their fight with congressional Republicans over how best to reduce the deficit, CBO indicates in a 513-page report to Congress obtained by Fox that nearly $2 billion of that is emergency funding. That is - spending that is not included in the budget and, therefore, does not affect the deficit.

An aide to Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, did not dispute the analysis of his boss' bill but merely pointed out that the goal of the chairman was to cut spending by $51 billion, when the President's current budget, which never passed Congress, is included as the base. But $41 billion of that was never enacted, so experts do not see that as a real cut. Current discretionary spending remains frozen at 2010 levels.

Likewise, Republicans really cut $61 billion and not $100 billion, as they tried to advertise. They, too, sought to use the President's current budget as the base from which they started to cut.



Great points.  BOTH SIDES were bullshitting americans.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2011, 11:25:06 AM »
Hoyer Says Federal Budget May Not Be Balanced for 20 Years
Tuesday, March 08, 2011
By Matt Cover

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hoyer-says-federal-budget-may-not-be-bal




House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer of Md., speaks to supporters at an election night party in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Washington (CNSNews.com) – House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said on Tuesday that it may take as many as 20 years to balance the federal budget after years of deficit spending in Washington.

At Hoyer's weekly press briefing on Capitol Hill, CNSNews.com noted that President Obama's latest budget proposal does not balance at any time in the next 10 years and asked Hoyer, "Do you plan on introducing anything that balances within that 10-year timeframe, or is that possible?"



Hoyer said, “Now [that] we’re at $14 trillion in debt, I think the answer is – responsibly – we’re not going to get there [a balanced budget] in ten years, but we have to be on a very considered path to get there, certainly, within the next decade and a half or two decades,” Hoyer said Tuesday at his weekly press briefing.

“I don’t think you can get there in ten years. I think it’s going to take a longer time [because] we’ve dug such a deep hole. We turned a $5.6 trillion [projected] surplus into $5 trillion in additional debt.”

Hoyer noted that even his 20-year estimate was based on a robustly growing economy that would allow the government to take in a normal level of tax revenue instead of the reduced revenue it expects to take in during a recession.

Hoyer, the number two House Democrat, said he is not satisfied with President Obama’s fiscal 2012 budget proposal, which does not balance the budget within ten years. President Obama said earlier that his fiscal 2012 budget request would lower the budget deficit by about $1 trillion over ten years.

Hoyer said Republicans and Democrats must compromise if they are ever going to solve the nation’s budget issues. “We have to – together, together – work on getting this deficit under control.”

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2011, 11:29:59 AM »
Even Hoyer is not happy with the President's plan.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2011, 12:29:44 PM »
Even Hoyer is not happy with the President's plan.

Even Bernie Madoff probably laughs at Obama.   

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2011, 01:03:13 PM »
Look who else is not happy with Obama:


Obama Has 'Failed to Lead' on Spending Cuts, Democratic Senator Says

Freshman Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin accused President Obama of sitting on the sidelines Tuesday while Congress debates "wildly different" budget bills that are expected to fail.

"Our president has failed to lead this debate or offer a serious proposal for spending and cuts that he would be willing to fight for," Manchin, D-W.Va., said on the Senate floor.

House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer shot back, saying Obama is the "point person" for the budget negotiations.

"He and his people are fully engaged in this effort," Hoyer said. "Senator Manchin, I think is incorrect."

But Manchin, who battled persistent criticism during his campaign that he was too close to the White House, had strong words for both parties.

He said Republicans' proposals were too sweeping and harsh while Democrats' proposals don't do enough to address the deficit problem.

Instead of engaging in what he called "political theater," Manchin urged the president to take a more active role and bring both parties together toward a budget compromise.

The government is currently operating on a temporary, two-week budget bill. Unless a broader budget is approved for the rest of 2011, Congress will likely have to approve another short-term bill to keep things running. So far, the parties have not been able to come together on a package that includes spending cuts they're both happy with.

Manchin, the former governor of West Virginia, will have to run for re-election in 2012. He has strived since his campaign to show he is independent from Democratic leaders in Washington.

But his comments add fuel to GOP claims that Democratic spending proposals do not go deep enough. Republicans are calling for $61 billion in spending cuts, while Democrats are proposing about $8.7 billion, according to a recent analysis. That includes $4 billion in cuts approved in the last two-week budget bill.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03/08/obama-failed-lead-spending-cuts-democratic-senator-says/#



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2011, 07:15:44 PM »
Bill To Reform Patent System Would Kill Innovation In U.S. (Correct Title)
IBD Editorials ^ | March 8, 2011 | Phyllis Schlafly



The Democratic Senate is itching to pass a bill that will mean death for innovation, which is the backbone of American economic growth. Sen. Patrick Leahy's bill, S. 23, is called patent reform, but it's not reform — it will kill innovation by litigation.

Now that the globalists have transferred millions of good American jobs to Asians willing to work for as little as 30 cents an hour with no benefits, all we have left to maintain and restore our economic well-being is our innovation superiority.

The United States is the world leader in inventing useful and important products and processes, while other countries build their economies by copying our innovations.

The mainspring of our success is the American patent system, unique when the Founding Fathers put it into the U.S. Constitution even before freedom of speech and religion, and still unique today.

Unfortunately, some globalists outside and even inside the United States want to reduce the American standard of living.

The core of our time-tested patent-granting system goes under the label first-to-invent, plus a one-year grace period. It is only common sense that the patent should be granted to the first person who actually invents something, and our Constitution specifically identifies "inventors" as the owner of the property right.


(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

whork25

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1653
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2011, 05:15:10 AM »
When did you hear a Republican claim that they need to keep explaining their legislations to the American people until they accept it?

Republican party has its flaws and has made errors. But, now they are trying to cut back on as much government waste as possible. Who is standing in their way?  Hint: It isn't the majority of citizens.

Republicans are not saints, but Democrats, AT THIS POINT, are far worse and more dangerous. Just look at what is going on in Wisconsin. Who is running away from facing the problem of state bankruptcy and the economic burden of public unions and refusing to try to solve those problems? It isn't the Republicans.

I have to agree with you on this good post

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2011, 05:46:23 AM »
Bill To Reform Patent System Would Kill Innovation In U.S. (Correct Title)
IBD Editorials ^ | March 8, 2011 | Phyllis Schlafly



The Democratic Senate is itching to pass a bill that will mean death for innovation, which is the backbone of American economic growth. Sen. Patrick Leahy's bill, S. 23, is called patent reform, but it's not reform — it will kill innovation by litigation.

Now that the globalists have transferred millions of good American jobs to Asians willing to work for as little as 30 cents an hour with no benefits, all we have left to maintain and restore our economic well-being is our innovation superiority.

The United States is the world leader in inventing useful and important products and processes, while other countries build their economies by copying our innovations.

The mainspring of our success is the American patent system, unique when the Founding Fathers put it into the U.S. Constitution even before freedom of speech and religion, and still unique today.

Unfortunately, some globalists outside and even inside the United States want to reduce the American standard of living.

The core of our time-tested patent-granting system goes under the label first-to-invent, plus a one-year grace period. It is only common sense that the patent should be granted to the first person who actually invents something, and our Constitution specifically identifies "inventors" as the owner of the property right.


(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


Get ready for third world status. If we are not already there.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2011, 05:52:32 AM »
CBO: Democrats’ “$6.5 Billion” in Spending Cuts Actually $4.7 Billion
ABC News ^ | 3/08/11 | Jake Tapper and Matthew Jaffe




CBO: Democrats’ “$6.5 Billion” in Spending Cuts Actually $4.7 Billion
March 08, 2011 5:47 PM


Jake Tapper and Matthew Jaffe report:


The Congressional Budget Office this week said that the Senate Democrats’ bill offers $4.7 billion in spending cuts -- not the $6.5 billion that President Obama and congressional Democrats said.


After last week’s meeting on Capitol Hill among congressional leaders and Vice President Biden, Senate Democrats wrote legislation and gave it to CBO to be analyzed.


CBO put the cuts at $4.7 billion.


The bottom line: Democrats and Republicans are roughly $52 billion apart in the cuts they want to see.


(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.abcnews.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic party=slimeballs
« Reply #24 on: March 09, 2011, 11:04:05 AM »
Categories:Appropriations.Reid: Save federal funding for the cowboy poets!
File this under: Did Harry Reid just say that?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0311/Reid_Save_federal_funding_for_the_cowboy_poets.html





In the middle of his tirade against House Republicans' "mean-spirited" budget bill on the Senate floor Tuesday, the Senate Majority Leader lamented that the GOP’s proposed budget cuts would eliminate the annual "cowboy poetry festival” in his home state of Nevada. (See also: Reid’s prostitution lecture bombs.)

Reid clearly has a soft spot for the Baxter Blacks of the poetry world and thinks Republicans don't.

“The mean-spirited bill, H.R. 1 … eliminates the National Endowment of the Humanities, National Endowment of the Arts,” said Reid. “These programs create jobs. The National Endowment of the Humanities is the reason we have in northern Nevada every January a cowboy poetry festival. Had that program not been around, the tens of thousands of people who come there every year would not exist.”

Reid was attempting, of course, to criticize the spending proposal crafted by House Republicans that would cut $61 billion from the budget before he began praising the annual festival in his home state. The Senate majority leader also insisted Tuesday that he would do everything he could to schedule an up-or-down vote on H.R. 1 in order to force his GOP colleagues to take a position on the budget bill that Democrats argue includes "draconian" cuts.

For the record, the National Cowboy Poetry Gathering is in Elko, Nev., next January. The 28th annual festival, a “week-long celebration of life in the rural West, featuring the contemporary and traditional arts of western ranching culture,” is expected to draw thousands of people, according to the festival’s website.