Author Topic: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics  (Read 10333 times)

closeline

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
« Reply #50 on: March 13, 2011, 03:43:04 AM »
photoshop or 7yrs ago  ;)

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
« Reply #51 on: March 13, 2011, 04:47:21 AM »
Unfortunately, it's the broom with arms. Had he competed at the Arnold or Aussie Pro, he would have won...we all know this.

You know, I was never a fan of Orville Burke, didn't like his high lats and I thought he had thick skin, and I thought he was overhyped, he is the same thing as Wolf.

Bbing is only reflective of the larger culture. As quality goes down there, quality goes down in the bbing world. It is what it is.

That's funny. I was a fan of Burke's physique. I don't know what's this thing about high lats but when your taller you are going to have a longer torso. The other poster was on point when he pointed out that BB's as a group are short so we are just use to seeing these fireplugs. Burke was around 5'11". I like that long torso look better. It gives a more streamline appearance. When I compare someone like Burke to the top placers at the last Olympia: Jay, Branch, Dex, Phil, I much prefer Burke. Black man even had decent calves. Damn decent. You think Phil or Dex looks better than this?




Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
« Reply #52 on: March 13, 2011, 05:28:12 AM »
That's funny. I was a fan of Burke's physique. I don't know what's this thing about high lats but when your taller you are going to have a longer torso. The other poster was on point when he pointed out that BB's as a group are short so we are just use to seeing these fireplugs. Burke was around 5'11". I like that long torso look better. It gives a more streamline appearance. When I compare someone like Burke to the top placers at the last Olympia: Jay, Branch, Dex, Phil, I much prefer Burke. Black man even had decent calves. Damn decent. You think Phil or Dex looks better than this?




I actually liked Flex's Physique better, and he had smaller waist, with lower lats, like Cedric does now. The high lats give a illusion of a smaller waist due to lack of "space", so visually the waist seems smaller, because the Lats don't go all the way down...

closeline

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
« Reply #53 on: March 13, 2011, 05:38:23 AM »
burke s body look like freak bodyparts stiched together by frankenstein

ugly body, lots of oil

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
« Reply #54 on: March 13, 2011, 05:53:47 AM »
burke s body look like freak bodyparts stiched together by frankenstein

ugly body, lots of oil

Exactly. He had a sick taper, but zero separation, huge gut, thick skin and was very oddly put together. Not to mention the loads of oil/Synthol in his calves and arms.

Naggash

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 528
Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
« Reply #55 on: March 13, 2011, 07:05:53 AM »
Bourke was not 5"11. Standing next to Tom Prince and other bbers from a few years ago he was roughly the same height.

Freaky ass taper , insane back and chest. Arms were a bit weak though.

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
« Reply #56 on: March 13, 2011, 04:52:34 PM »
Parker is hopeless

I don't even bother reading his posts anymore

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
« Reply #57 on: March 13, 2011, 05:00:34 PM »
Exactly. He had a sick taper, but zero separation, huge gut, thick skin and was very oddly put together. Not to mention the loads of oil/Synthol in his calves and arms.

Yup, zero separation, huge gut, thick skin and oddly put together. And unlike Jay and Branch (and not to forget Flex), his arms are just dripping with oil. Home boy had some balls stepping on stage looking like that.  ::)


TrapsMcLats

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2801
  • Lift Heavy. Lift Hard.
Re: Australian Pro - The BIG BAD WOLF Pics
« Reply #58 on: March 13, 2011, 06:40:20 PM »
Vegetable by 40:



Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17201
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
« Reply #59 on: March 13, 2011, 06:50:58 PM »

MB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2312
Re: The BIG BAD WOLF - Australian Pro Pics.
« Reply #60 on: March 13, 2011, 07:31:44 PM »
Nope, he'd still have a shitty structure...99% of top bbers, black and white look like SHIT!
You can turn Wolf into a Unicorn, and he still would be a shitty Unicorn. I call it as I see it, and people don't like that their fan favorite, who is their GWH, sucks pig tits. Sorry, it is what it is. And people are okay with that. They go down the road Okie Dokie style...as long as you take it and don't say shit, they will continue to push inferior physiques down your throats, and you get used to it.
I hated Flex's 2000 look, and I voiced that Cormier should have won. I hated it when Dillett won over Ruhl, and stated Ruhl should have won.You see this too?
Dennis probably has the best structure of anyone competing today.  Wide shoulders, small waist, good quad sweep.  He's the definition of X-frame.