Author Topic: Anyone else not impressed by Dennis Wolf?  (Read 13230 times)

lovemonkey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7750
  • Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #50 on: March 13, 2011, 05:59:32 PM »
tkneegrowdong has got to be one of the most arrogant and annoying people on this board.
from incomplete data

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59575
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #51 on: March 13, 2011, 06:02:32 PM »
hahahahahahahahha!
Hey!! I see what you did there! >:(
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #52 on: March 13, 2011, 06:17:51 PM »
That's why I don't understand when Parker says that Wolf has a "nonexistent" lower back. I mean, seriously. People here as so jaded.
Because his back detail stops midback...there is hole or chunk missing from his lower back...
Kinda like how Levrone was missing thick detail in the Mid back---he had detail, but it wasn't Dorian, Ronnie, or Flex detail...

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #53 on: March 13, 2011, 10:39:07 PM »
Im sure Jay can bench a pretty good amount of weight.

And yes I agree he could get stronger. But he most likely cant get THAT much stronger. Im sure in his 20 plus years of training he's gotten pretty damn strong. Because ive seen Jay bench 405 for reps with ease and that was in a pretty old video. So the dude has built up strength.

But the fact that Taylor doesnt understand is that strength always equal size.



if anyone increases the amount of weight they are lifting by a significant amount they are going to get bigger. end of story. no more discussion.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #54 on: March 13, 2011, 10:41:21 PM »



Hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha
  ::)   yes you did such a great job with king kamali



increase in size=increase in strength


flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #55 on: March 13, 2011, 11:16:55 PM »
if anyone increases the amount of weight they are lifting by a significant amount they are going to get bigger. end of story. no more discussion.

So tell me why bodybuilders have bigger quads and hamstrings then powerlifters who can squat 1000 lbs

Or

Why in a bodybuilding standpoint why arent bodybuilders like stan efferding, johnnie jackson, and ben white who are world class strong the biggest bodybuilders on the planet?

Firemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5453
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #56 on: March 13, 2011, 11:27:51 PM »
So tell me why bodybuilders have bigger quads and hamstrings then powerlifters who can squat 1000 lbs

Or

Why in a bodybuilding standpoint why arent bodybuilders like stan efferding, johnnie jackson, and ben white who are world class strong the biggest bodybuilders on the planet?

 I agree. Tbambz training philosophies are bullshit. There are many, many examples to prove him wrong.

 When I pump my muscles up with light weights and high reps they grow the best. They don't gain much explosive stregth or increase my lifting maximums, but it builds muscle endurance and size.

 Strength = size, that's a bullshit philosphy.

 Come on now Tbombz, don't you know this is bullshit? And seriously dogg, maybe you should try a different strategy because your body ain't looking too spectacular. No offense.

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #57 on: March 13, 2011, 11:37:27 PM »
I agree. Tbambz training philosophies are bullshit. There are many, many examples to prove him wrong.

 When I pump my muscles up with light weights and high reps they grow the best. They don't gain much explosive stregth or increase my lifting maximums, but it builds muscle endurance and size.

 Strength = size, that's a bullshit philosphy.

 Come on now Tbombz, don't you know this is bullshit? And seriously dogg, maybe you should try a different strategy because your body ain't looking too spectacular. No offense.

Plus what he doesnt take into account is after awhile everyone maxes out in strength.

If not everyone in the gym would be benching 10 plates on each side and squatting 2000lbs.

Firemuscle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5453
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #58 on: March 13, 2011, 11:42:05 PM »
Plus what he doesnt take into account is after awhile everyone maxes out in strength.

If not everyone in the gym would be benching 10 plates on each side and squatting 2000lbs.

 Yup. I reached my genetic strength limit back when I was like 21. But my muscles gained more size after that, even though my strength decreased.

 And we have all seen small guys who are ridiculously strong. Or huge guys who are weak.

 Like Phil Heath. The ultimate in big, weak muscles.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #59 on: March 14, 2011, 05:47:23 AM »
While im sure their is some correlation in relative strength and relative size, to say "increase your strength will increase you size" is stupid. Its already been argued 1000x, and its already been disproved 1000x.
Not to mention the scientific study where people added strength with no appreciable size.

CalvinH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22229
  • Spastic Tarted Cvunt
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #60 on: March 14, 2011, 06:57:12 AM »

Kim Jong Bob

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7593
  • KIM JONG IL ORIGINAL BEATIFULL MAN WITH GLASSES
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #61 on: March 14, 2011, 07:09:23 AM »
hahahahahahahahha!
lol :D



increasing weight = more muscle question: depends on how you lift it of course, i lowered my weights with about 30 % and started to grow like a mf, just because i changed the way i lifted, like in the bench i tryed to use as little shoulderstress as possible

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #62 on: March 14, 2011, 02:45:00 PM »
So tell me why bodybuilders have bigger quads and hamstrings then powerlifters who can squat 1000 lbs

because they actually use their quads and hamstrings, unlike "powerlifters" who do a "squat" with their guts, glutes, and lower back. also, training volume.

Or

Why in a bodybuilding standpoint why arent bodybuilders like stan efferding, johnnie jackson, and ben white who are world class strong the biggest bodybuilders on the planet?

never did i say that two guys of equal strength would be equal size. i said that if a guy gets stronger, he will get bigger. and if a guy gets bigger, then he got stronger as well. theres no way around those two facts.  but good job bringin up those guys. cause guess what. they havent added any size since they started "bodybuilding". they gained all their size powerlifting, getting stronger, and since they started "bodybuilding" they have stagnated.

guys, this isnt rocket science, and its been proven over and over again that load is the main determinant of muscle growth/muscle size.

if you have insane genetics AND your on drugs, or you are brand new to lifting, then you can kep gwoing simply by going into the gym and applying stimulus, regardless of progressive overload.  but for the rest of us mere mortals the only way to grow is to lift heavier weights.

 but even those guys with insane genetics that can get huge by lifting small weights get very strong once they get big. a big guy is always a strong guy. theres no way around that.  if you want to be big, get strong. only then can you expect to be big.

Master Blaster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6610
  • Not sure if getbig full of trolls or trolls getbig
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #63 on: March 14, 2011, 02:55:56 PM »

I've been away a long time, chaos... apparently you have to put the words "no homo" after your post to indicate you are not sexually attracted to what you are posting about...



FYI

we've had a lot of name changes

for instance Tito24 is actually...

Oh fuck it, I'm going to go grab some lunch.

axestream

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1854
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #64 on: March 14, 2011, 03:19:56 PM »
Dexters been the same size for 10 years. 

People keep saying that, but it's complete bullshit. Compare Dexter of 2003 to Dex in 2008. There's a huge difference, but I understand why people say he's always been the same. That's because they're used to guys gaining a lot of size (including mid section) and fucking up their balance and Dexter has kept his.

As for Wolf, the biggest reason why I don't consider him a future Mr O is because he lacks muscle separation. Good frame though.

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #65 on: March 15, 2011, 02:08:00 PM »
guys, this isnt rocket science, and its been proven over and over again that load is the main determinant of muscle growth/muscle size.

if you have insane genetics AND your on drugs, or you are brand new to lifting, then you can kep gwoing simply by going into the gym and applying stimulus, regardless of progressive overload.  but for the rest of us mere mortals the only way to grow is to lift heavier weights.

 but even those guys with insane genetics that can get huge by lifting small weights get very strong once they get big. a big guy is always a strong guy. theres no way around that.  if you want to be big, get strong. only then can you expect to be big.

Well, lets see those studies that "prove over and over again that load is the main determinate..."?

"In summary, the ability to exert more force after strength training is not solely the result of muscle fiber adaptation, but involves extremely important adaptations in connective tissue and the nervous system as well. Many scientists argue that the connective tissue and the nervous system adaptations are probably more important to overall strength gains than the changes in the muscle fibers."

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2010/08/12/new-secret-building-muscle-revealed-pump-iron/

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #66 on: March 15, 2011, 02:41:14 PM »
Well, lets see those studies that "prove over and over again that load is the main determinate..."?

"In summary, the ability to exert more force after strength training is not solely the result of muscle fiber adaptation, but involves extremely important adaptations in connective tissue and the nervous system as well. Many scientists argue that the connective tissue and the nervous system adaptations are probably more important to overall strength gains than the changes in the muscle fibers."

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2010/08/12/new-secret-building-muscle-revealed-pump-iron/


use common sense

whats the function of muscle?  why would an organism grow big muscles? under what conditions would they be suitable? why would an organism have big muscles if they werent being used for their purpose?

big muscles are necessary only if you are lifting big weights. the strength of a muscle is directly related to its cross sectional area. fact. basic physics. indisputable.

oh, heres a study that proves a big muscle is a strong muscle, and load is the primary determinant of muscle growth. way to go quoting fox news though.  ;D


http://physrev.physiology.org/content/71/2/541.full.pdf+html?ijkey=50c40bd7f613d8bbbc6899d910ba9afd06b17e79&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha






pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #67 on: March 15, 2011, 03:03:54 PM »
use common sense

whats the function of muscle?  why would an organism grow big muscles? under what conditions would they be suitable? why would an organism have big muscles if they werent being used for their purpose?

big muscles are necessary only if you are lifting big weights. the strength of a muscle is directly related to its cross sectional area. fact. basic physics. indisputable.

oh, heres a study that proves a big muscle is a strong muscle, and load is the primary determinant of muscle growth. way to go quoting fox news though.  ;D


http://physrev.physiology.org/content/71/2/541.full.pdf+html?ijkey=50c40bd7f613d8bbbc6899d910ba9afd06b17e79&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha







Copy and paste the study. I'm not able to to access it. And you really show how close minded you are. You think the staff at Fox wrote this article and did the study? Like all newspapers they are reporting information obtain by someone else. In this case Live Science.
It was simply a random choice that I picked the Fox report. Is this better?
Do you know the difference between causation and correlation? Give me an example. I'll trust that you'll do it on your own and not frantically google.

http://www.livescience.com/6833-secret-building-muscle-revealed-pump-iron.html

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Anyone else not impressed by Dennis Wolf?
« Reply #68 on: March 15, 2011, 03:05:31 PM »
 ::)

correlation= pellius lives in hawaii and hawaii is full of tiny people

causation= pellius never lifts big weights and thus he is tiny

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #69 on: March 15, 2011, 03:15:53 PM »
let me ask you this.  lets say jay cutler has been using  400lbs for his bench press. doing 8-15 set per workout, abotu 10 reps each.  now lets say he focusus on strength for a while, and next year he works out all year with 500lbs pounds on bench. still doing 8-15 sets, 10 reps each.  you think his chest wont be bigger?  it has to be.

you really dont get this huh?

the drugs you use are the most determintal factor of how you will look ! you need to kift heavy yes but only heavy enough to stress the muscle,,the heaviest lifters are NOT ALWYAS THE BIGGEST FELLAS MUSCLE WIZE,,in many timesthey are the stiff average looking fellas with strong bones and tendoins

the idea behind bodybuild is this friend,,


you go down to 6% you get it as sculpted as you can via testosterona,, trenbolona ,, equipona ,,masterona ,,and gh,,

thennnnnnnn when you are 6% 200lb....you start building a new phase of TRUE LEAN MUSCLE  by

1. increasing dose of gh ,,
2. increasing dose of testosterona into the 1-2 grams a week
3. adding equipona or nandrolona in the 1000 mg a week
4. adding trenbolona for freak factor and lean growth in the 100-150mg a day EVERY DAY
5. adding insulin and not in the 2 iu a day balonie lol


this is it friend,,, thats how we do i t,,always was always be like this,,this is how we grow ,,

we go down to lower singles,,then we blow up from within by increasing testosterona into long ester and grams a week,, increasing or keeping trenbolona the same doses ,, and increasing the gh due to the addition of ALL TOGETHERR NOW....I N S U L I N A


that is just how it is ,,all the balonie talk abotu strength ,,thats good foro 182lb fellas who play wanna be every night in gym,, you really think we have time to break records when we have to pay bills ,,pay attention to woman ,,pay food,,eat,,take drugs every day in the MULTIPLE SHOTS,, and wory about work and how we get money because we need pay house morgage or rent for house,,comon now you are smarter than this balonie

wize up

gh15 approved

gh15 approved
fallen angel

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Anyone else not impressed by Dennis Wolf?
« Reply #70 on: March 15, 2011, 03:39:26 PM »
::)

correlation= pellius lives in hawaii and hawaii is full of tiny people

causation= pellius never lifts big weights and thus he is tiny

Hawaiians, Samoans and Tongans are tiny people, huh? You really are an ignorant person. And your ego and arrogance will keep you as such. But how can you be taken seriously when you brag on a public board that you prefer being a bottom and getting fucked by men with big cocks. Your parents must be so proud.

for men i have a different standard. need to be at least an 8. unless he is lean and has a big dick, then i could do a 5-6. if he has a small dick, any smaller than mine, then i probably wont be interested in him at all. unless he is really hot, and loves bottoming. normally i wanna be the bottom if im with a guy though. transexual? never done that. never had the oppurtunity. but yes i would love to. preferance= extremely womanly, could pass for an 8 or better in clothes, but with a massive hidden suprise. i think it would be reall really hot to get fucked by a hot chick. and that would be a million times better than any strap on could provide.

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: Anyone else not impressed by Dennis Wolf?
« Reply #71 on: March 15, 2011, 05:15:52 PM »
you really dont get this huh?
the drugs you use are the most determintal factor of how you will look ! you need to kift heavy yes but only heavy enough to stress the muscle,,the heaviest lifters are NOT ALWYAS THE BIGGEST FELLAS MUSCLE WIZE,,in many timesthey are the stiff average looking fellas with strong bones and tendoins

the idea behind bodybuild is this friend,,


you go down to 6% you get it as sculpted as you can via testosterona,, trenbolona ,, equipona ,,masterona ,,and gh,,

thennnnnnnn when you are 6% 200lb....you start building a new phase of TRUE LEAN MUSCLE  by

1. increasing dose of gh ,,
2. increasing dose of testosterona into the 1-2 grams a week
3. adding equipona or nandrolona in the 1000 mg a week
4. adding trenbolona for freak factor and lean growth in the 100-150mg a day EVERY DAY
5. adding insulin and not in the 2 iu a day balonie lol


this is it friend,,, thats how we do i t,,always was always be like this,,this is how we grow ,,

we go down to lower singles,,then we blow up from within by increasing testosterona into long ester and grams a week,, increasing or keeping trenbolona the same doses ,, and increasing the gh due to the addition of ALL TOGETHERR NOW....I N S U L I N A


that is just how it is ,,all the balonie talk abotu strength ,,thats good foro 182lb fellas who play wanna be every night in gym,, you really think we have time to break records when we have to pay bills ,,pay attention to woman ,,pay food,,eat,,take drugs every day in the MULTIPLE SHOTS,, and wory about work and how we get money because we need pay house morgage or rent for house,,comon now you are smarter than this balonie

wize up

gh15 approved

gh15 approved

Just stop trying. He really doesnt get it!

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Australian Pro - Anyone else not impressed by Wolfe?
« Reply #72 on: March 15, 2011, 06:22:21 PM »
im not diminishing the role drugs play. the only reason why wolf looks the way he does is because of the drugs he is using. hes been using tons of drugs, and the past few years even all those drugs havent been able to make him grow. you can only use so much steroids, GH, etc. im sure wolf is maxed out, at least as far as he is willing to take it. the only way hes gonna grow now is bigger weights. what hes been doing hasnt been cutting it- he hasnt grown in years.



you really dont get this huh?

the drugs you use are the most determintal factor of how you will look ! you need to kift heavy yes but only heavy enough to stress the muscle,,the heaviest lifters are NOT ALWYAS THE BIGGEST FELLAS MUSCLE WIZE,,in many timesthey are the stiff average looking fellas with strong bones and tendoins

the idea behind bodybuild is this friend,,


you go down to 6% you get it as sculpted as you can via testosterona,, trenbolona ,, equipona ,,masterona ,,and gh,,

thennnnnnnn when you are 6% 200lb....you start building a new phase of TRUE LEAN MUSCLE  by

1. increasing dose of gh ,,
2. increasing dose of testosterona into the 1-2 grams a week
3. adding equipona or nandrolona in the 1000 mg a week
4. adding trenbolona for freak factor and lean growth in the 100-150mg a day EVERY DAY
5. adding insulin and not in the 2 iu a day balonie lol


this is it friend,,, thats how we do i t,,always was always be like this,,this is how we grow ,,

we go down to lower singles,,then we blow up from within by increasing testosterona into long ester and grams a week,, increasing or keeping trenbolona the same doses ,, and increasing the gh due to the addition of ALL TOGETHERR NOW....I N S U L I N A


that is just how it is ,,all the balonie talk abotu strength ,,thats good foro 182lb fellas who play wanna be every night in gym,, you really think we have time to break records when we have to pay bills ,,pay attention to woman ,,pay food,,eat,,take drugs every day in the MULTIPLE SHOTS,, and wory about work and how we get money because we need pay house morgage or rent for house,,comon now you are smarter than this balonie

wize up

gh15 approved

gh15 approved

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Anyone else not impressed by Dennis Wolf?
« Reply #73 on: March 15, 2011, 06:24:01 PM »
Hawaiians, Samoans and Tongans are tiny people, huh? You really are an ignorant person. And your ego and arrogance will keep you as such. But how can you be taken seriously when you brag on a public board that you prefer being a bottom and getting fucked by men with big cocks. Your parents must be so proud.

oh brother  ::)

ThaRealist

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3393
  • Team REal LiFe
Re: Anyone else not impressed by Dennis Wolf?
« Reply #74 on: March 15, 2011, 06:45:21 PM »
I didn't bother reading the whole thread, but Dennis had/has the genetics to be great, but finds a way to fuck it up since 2007
You Can't Do It!!!