Author Topic: UN imposes No-Fly Zone over Libya (Read 6438 times)

240 is Back · « **Reply #75 on:** March 20, 2011, 06:31:41 AM »

Quote from: Skip8282 on March 20, 2011, 05:33:57 AM

Too late vote and zero action?
What the fuck do you call all those missiles we shot over there. We're knee deep in this muck - and you can thank Barry.

Spin? It's easy.

Obama was able to trick kadaffi into letting down his guard, then POW. lights out baby.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #76 on:** March 20, 2011, 06:35:36 AM »

The spin from you libs on this is bizarre to say the least.

Dos Equis · « **Reply #77 on:** March 20, 2011, 07:27:34 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on March 20, 2011, 06:31:41 AM

Spin? It's easy.

Obama was able to trick kadaffi into letting down his guard, then POW. lights out baby.

That's silly. Let down what guard? They couldn't have done a thing differently had we dropped leaflets announcing the date and time our missiles would hit.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #78 on:** March 20, 2011, 07:51:30 AM »

Just read on reuters that this is only the first step today.

Wow. Bama got his own little war to call his own now.

Fury · « **Reply #79 on:** March 20, 2011, 07:58:18 AM »

(Politico)- A hard-core group of liberal House Democrats is questioning the constitutionality of U.S. missile strikes against Libya, with one lawmaker raising the prospect of impeachment during a Democratic Caucus conference call on Saturday.

Reps. Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.), Donna Edwards (Md.), Mike Capuano (Mass.), Dennis Kucinich (Ohio), Maxine Waters (Calif.), Rob Andrews (N.J.), Sheila Jackson Lee (Texas), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D.C.) “all strongly raised objections to the constitutionality of the president’s actions” during that call, said two Democratic lawmakers who took part.

Kucinich, who wanted to bring impeachment articles against both former President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney over Iraq — only to be blocked by his own leadership — asked why the U.S. missile strikes aren’t impeachable offenses.

Kucinich also questioned why Democratic leaders didn’t object when President Barack Obama told them of his plan for American participation in enforcing the Libyan no-fly zone during a White House Situation Room meeting on Friday, sources told POLITICO.

And liberals fumed that Congress hadn’t been formally consulted before the attack and expressed concern that it would lead to a third U.S. war in the Muslim world.

Fury · « **Reply #80 on:** March 20, 2011, 07:59:16 AM »

Here's a shocker. The Arab League is already bitching about the military action. Who would have thought that these scumbags would have done nothing to contribute to it? Talk about a nice set-up by them.

(Reuters) — The Arab League chief said on Sunday that Arabs did not want military strikes by Western powers that hit civilians when the League called for a no-fly zone over Libya.

In comments carried by Egypt’s official state news agency, Secretary-General Amr Moussa also said he was calling for an emergency Arab League meeting to discuss the situation in the Arab world and particularly Libya.

“What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians,” he said.

Skip8282 · « **Reply #81 on:** March 20, 2011, 08:29:08 AM »

Quote from: BerzerkFury on March 20, 2011, 07:59:16 AM

Here's a shocker. The Arab League is already bitching about the military action. Who would have thought that these scumbags would have done nothing to contribute to it? Talk about a nice set-up by them.

(Reuters) — The Arab League chief said on Sunday that Arabs did not want military strikes by Western powers that hit civilians when the League called for a no-fly zone over Libya.

In comments carried by Egypt’s official state news agency, Secretary-General Amr Moussa also said he was calling for an emergency Arab League meeting to discuss the situation in the Arab world and particularly Libya.

“What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians,” he said.

Exactly. They're completely full of shit and knew precisely what a NFZ meant. And I'd be willing to bet that somebody (maybe us, maybe not) has boots on the ground doing recon on Libya's air defense positions. And if any of those brave souls are caught, I can only imagine the cry baby shit coming from the AL.

Fury · « **Reply #82 on:** March 20, 2011, 08:32:49 AM »

Quote from: Skip8282 on March 20, 2011, 08:29:08 AM

Exactly. They're completely full of shit and knew precisely what a NFZ meant. And I'd be willing to bet that somebody (maybe us, maybe not) has boots on the ground doing recon on Libya's air defense positions. And if any of those brave souls are caught, I can only imagine the cry baby shit coming from the AL.

We were played for fools by them and the Euros. We'll, once again, be the focus of Muslim rage for being "imperialists", the Euros will get their oil and the Arab League, who pushed for this, comes off looking like the saviors when they contribute nothing to it and condemn it. And we all know they wouldn't be saying shit if those bombs were falling on Iranian air defenses.

I don't think Obama's foreign policy could be more idiotic.

240 is Back · « **Reply #83 on:** March 20, 2011, 08:48:27 AM »

WTF?

I thought this was a lib war. Only the GOP canddiates were all over it. Now the libs in congress are protesting and the repubs are quiet.

Still a leftist war?

Or can we admit it's just a war machine war now?

Fury · « **Reply #84 on:** March 20, 2011, 08:51:59 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on March 20, 2011, 08:48:27 AM

WTF?

I thought this was a lib war. Only the GOP canddiates were all over it. Now the libs in congress are protesting and the repubs are quiet.

Still a leftist war?

Or can we admit it's just a war machine war now?

You know that you were the twat that started the lib/conservative slant when you purposely ignored Kerry in your little diatribe about McCain, right?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #85 on:** March 20, 2011, 08:53:26 AM »

I could care less its stupid regardless.

240 is Back · « **Reply #86 on:** March 20, 2011, 09:00:45 AM »

Quote from: BerzerkFury on March 20, 2011, 08:51:59 AM

You know that you were the twat that started the lib/conservative slant when you purposely ignored Kerry in your little diatribe about McCain, right?

you're 100% right. We should give John Kerry, the windsurfing d-bag, complete credit for convincing Newt, mccain and t-paw to join the 'leftist' war effort.

he's a powerful leader and they seem to be lib tools. Nice.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #87 on:** March 20, 2011, 09:02:57 AM »

John Fn Kerry better come out and say this is the right war at the right time.

240 is Back · « **Reply #88 on:** March 20, 2011, 09:11:39 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 20, 2011, 09:02:57 AM

John Fn Kerry better come out and say this is the right war at the right time.

He's a tool of the war industry. Just like newt, hilary, and the rest of them. This isn't a "democrat" war. Period.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #89 on:** March 20, 2011, 09:19:00 AM »

Was iraq a repub war.

240 is Back · « **Reply #90 on:** March 20, 2011, 09:22:49 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 20, 2011, 09:19:00 AM

Was iraq a repub war.

nope. another warmonger war. just like afghanistan and the wars before it.

elective and avoidable. saddam tried to flee iraq/surrender with 24 horus left - we wanted war. Taleban offered to deliver OBL to NYC in a pine box - we preferred to invade.

it's all about war, baby. big business. To sit there and say "but but the leftists want this and that..." is incredible naive dude. It's about evil rich a-holes who profit from war and conflict.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #91 on:** March 20, 2011, 09:25:10 AM »

Right war at the right time.

240 is Back · « **Reply #92 on:** March 20, 2011, 09:34:32 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 20, 2011, 09:25:10 AM

Right war at the right time.

mccain/palin would be invading too. and libs would be screaming about it.

it's big business, always has been, always will be. Rich people get richer, politicians sell it, and poor people fight it. nations with resources, positions, or vulnerabilities get stomped.

Way of the world. since the beginning of the world, til the end of time. nothing to do with "lefists leading the charge!" has everything to do with war, inc.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #93 on:** March 20, 2011, 09:39:16 AM »

That idiotc twink lindsey graham was out there giving cover today. I'm wth kucinich - impeach!

240 is Back · « **Reply #94 on:** March 20, 2011, 11:15:32 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 20, 2011, 09:39:16 AM

That idiotc twink lindsey graham was out there giving cover today. I'm wth kucinich - impeach!

lots of dems and lots of repubs love this war.

lots of them hate it too. doesn't seem to be any party line divide on this one.

I don't see how balding*, heavily armed people ever considered to be a leftist war.

*also a member of Team MPB.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #95 on:** March 20, 2011, 12:43:13 PM »

comments.

Libya to give weapons to one million people: report
Reuters ^ | March 20, 2011 | Staff

(Reuters) - Libya's government has begun distributing arms to more than one million people and will complete the operation within hours, the state news agency reported on Sunday.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...

240 is Back · « **Reply #96 on:** March 20, 2011, 01:19:43 PM »

LMAO.... he won't be giving out that many. He does that and he's arming the rebels lol...

nice scare tactic, but it'll be everyone waiting for him to leave.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #97 on:** March 20, 2011, 01:22:08 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on March 20, 2011, 01:19:43 PM

LMAO.... he won't be giving out that many. He does that and he's arming the rebels lol...

nice scare tactic, but it'll be everyone waiting for him to leave.

You really are embarrassingyoursel with your 24/7 kneepadding Obama. bro - what the hell happened to you? Honestly - I dont even think you realize it anymore.

240 is Back · « **Reply #98 on:** March 20, 2011, 01:23:09 PM »

i don't think kadaffi will give 1 million guns to his people. i really dont'. maybe i'll be wrong. but IMO he'll be flying outta there on some side deal in the next week.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #99 on:** March 20, 2011, 01:24:58 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on March 20, 2011, 01:23:09 PM

i don't think kadaffi will give 1 million guns to his people. i really dont'. maybe i'll be wrong. but IMO he'll be flying outta there on some side deal in the next week.

One can only imaginehow you would react if this were prez palin doing this.

Oh thats right - its boy wonder, your lord , savior, messiah, and glorious leader, so its ok now.