Author Topic: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?  (Read 3299 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« on: March 20, 2011, 06:57:48 AM »
He was at 51% gallup this week - will (like many presidents), the initial entry into war bring Americans together? 

And if so, why didn't (all those republicans supporting the attack) foresee this? 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39421
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2011, 07:09:14 AM »
Worked out great for pappa bush.   Lol.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2011, 07:23:13 AM »
Worked out great for pappa bush.   Lol.

Initially, it DID work well for GHWB.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63738
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2011, 07:31:39 AM »
Approval rating spike followed by ratings in the 30s and losing reelection?  I'd say that didn't work out too well. 

I do not think this will give Obama a sustained bump.  Haven't seen polls regarding Libya, but I doubt the majority of the public will support this (or at a minimum a majority of independents and Republicans). 

He has some serious explaining to do.  I really want to see how he reconciles his past comments on military action with this stuff. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39421
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2011, 07:38:07 AM »
Not to mention not even getting a resolution from the congress. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2011, 07:48:54 AM »
HW would have won if perot hadn't entered.


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39421
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2011, 07:53:57 AM »
Perot would not have entered if hw were not a nwo rino out of touch w reality like your hero and messiah is.

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • TND
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2011, 10:09:34 AM »
240, if Obama plunges America into an apocolyptic civil war, we are successfully attacked by Al Queda, the Chinese calls our debt obligation, it is proven that Obama was not born in America and Louis Farakhan is given a position at the Pentagon, would you still vote Obama in 2012 if the GOP nominee is Sarah Palin?

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2011, 10:36:07 AM »
240, if Obama plunges America into an apocolyptic civil war, we are successfully attacked by Al Queda, the Chinese calls our debt obligation, it is proven that Obama was not born in America and Louis Farakhan is given a position at the Pentagon, would you still vote Obama in 2012 if the GOP nominee is Sarah Palin?

I don't know what you're talking about. 240's a libertarian. My proof is the one libertarian post he makes for every 5,000 pro-Obama posts.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2011, 11:16:20 AM »
240, if Obama plunges America into an apocolyptic civil war, we are successfully attacked by Al Queda, the Chinese calls our debt obligation, it is proven that Obama was not born in America and Louis Farakhan is given a position at the Pentagon, would you still vote Obama in 2012 if the GOP nominee is Sarah Palin?

there is some set of circumstances where Palin would get my vote.

Would she also pose in Hustler?

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #10 on: March 20, 2011, 11:17:30 AM »
240, if Obama plunges America into an apocolyptic civil war, we are successfully attacked by Al Queda, the Chinese calls our debt obligation, it is proven that Obama was not born in America and Louis Farakhan is given a position at the Pentagon, would you still vote Obama in 2012 if the GOP nominee is Sarah Palin?

You know there are millions that would.

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • TND
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2011, 02:30:16 PM »
You know there are millions that would.

Racist post reported.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39421
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #12 on: March 23, 2011, 05:25:12 AM »
He was at 51% gallup this week - will (like many presidents), the initial entry into war bring Americans together? 

And if so, why didn't (all those republicans supporting the attack) foresee this? 


Obama is down to 44% on gallup today. 

Guess your theory did not work out too well.

People are sick of ths disgusting wretch and communist grifter and his hippo wife.

  http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx




240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2011, 05:26:04 AM »
you are correct, he's dropped a lot this week. 

If kadaffi is strung up on the streets this week (or flees), will obama's number rise, 33?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39421
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #14 on: March 23, 2011, 05:27:16 AM »
you are correct, he's dropped a lot this week. 

If kadaffi is strung up on the streets this week (or flees), will obama's number rise, 33?

No.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63738
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2011, 09:34:46 AM »
CNN's spin on the poll numbers is pretty funny.

Polls: Americans approve of military action in Libya
By: CNN's Rebecca Stewart

Washington (CNN) - A new Gallup poll indicates that a plurality of Americans approve of military action against Libya. Forty-seven percent say that they approve of the current U.S. military actions in Libya, with 37 percent saying they disapprove, according to the survey, which was released Wednesday.

The poll questioned respondents after the U.S. joined other countries in enforcing a United Nations-approved no-fly zone over Libya, where longtime strongman Moammar Gadhafi is engaged in attacks against groups trying to topple his government.

And on the issue of Libya, the poll reflects that Democrats and Republicans agree; slim majorities of each political party approve of U.S. military action against Libya. Slightly over half of Democrats-51 percent– approve of action in Libya and 57 percent of Republicans feel the same. Most independents do not look favorably upon military action against Libya since 38 percent approve and 44 percent disapprove, the poll finds.

But a two polls reflect different results than the Gallup survey shows. A CNN/Opinion Research poll released Monday reveals that a larger majority of Americans, 7 in 10, favor establishing a no-fly zone in Libya that is enforced by military planes from the U.S. and other countries. The poll was conducted March 18-20 during the same timeframe that military action began. About half the respondents were questioned before military action began in Libya and there's no indication that opinions changed as a result of air strikes that occurred in Libya during that weekend. By the same percentage, 70 percent of Americans also disapprove of sending ground troops from the U.S. to the conflict and 28 percent of those asked approve.

The poll also indicates that more Republicans than Democrats support for a no-fly zone over Libya 77 to 64 percent, but 7 in 10 independents who were surveyed support this military action, by a larger percentage than Democrats.

CBS News released findings similar to the poll released by CNN/Opinion Research. Respondents questioned after air and cruise missile strikes began in Libya said they approved of military action by 68 percent. Over a quarter disapproved of air strikes in Libya by the U.S. and other countries.

Three quarters of Americans said the air strikes would be effective in protecting Libyan civilians, with 20 percent of those saying they'd be very effective and 54 percent showing more caution and saying air strikes will be somewhat effective. Eighteen percent say they will either not be very effective, or not be effective at all.

The Gallup poll was conducted among 1,010 adults via telephone on March 21. It has a sampling error of plus-or-minus four percentage points.
The CNN/Opinion Research poll questioned 1,012 adults from March 18-20 via telephone. It has a sampling error of plus-or-minus three percentage points.

The CBS News poll was conducted among 1,022 adults via telephone from March 20-21. It has a sampling error of plus-or-minus three percentage points.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/23/polls-americans-approve-of-military-action-in-libya/

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2011, 09:35:55 AM »
majority of repubs, and majority of dems, support bombing libya.

it's only the independents (who also chose charlie sheen over palin for president) that don't like this war.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63738
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #17 on: March 24, 2011, 10:33:06 AM »
Rasmussen: 45% Support U.S. Military Action in Libya
Thursday, 24 Mar 2011 11:55 AM

Voters have mixed feelings about President Obama's decision to use the U.S. military to help rebels in Libya and nearly half agree that he should have gotten Congress' approval first.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 45 percent of Likely U.S. Voters support the president's decision to take military action in Libya. Thirty-four percent disagree with that decision, and another 21 percent are not sure about it.

Fifty-five percent of Democrats and a plurality (42 percent) of voters not affiliated with either major party support the president's decision to use U.S. military force in Libya. Just 36 percent of Republicans share that view.

Liberals agree more strongly with the president's action than do moderates and conservatives.

Among all voters, 47 percent think the president should have gotten congressional approval before ordering the military into action in Libya. Thirty-four percent say the prior approval of Congress was not necessary, but 19 percent more are undecided.

The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on March 22-23, 2011, by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points.

Eighty-seven percent of voters say they are following news reports about the political unrest in Libya at least somewhat closely, with 51 percent who are following Very Closely.

In a survey earlier this week, 34 percent of Likely Voters favored more direct U.S. involvement in Libya, up 12 points from 22 percent two weeks before. But voters were also more critical of the president's handling of the situation than they were in the previous survey.

The United States began missile attacks on Libya on Saturday followed since by air strikes intended to enforce a no-fly zone over the country to protect rebels seeking to overthrow longtime Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi.

The British and French also are participating in the military operations, but the coalition of forces involved is now reportedly in major disarray.

Most Americans now fear that the political unrest roiling Arab nations like Egypt and Libya may get America into another big war.

Just before the president's announcement of the Libya action, 41 percent of all voters said he was doing a good or excellent job handling national security issues, while 36 percent gave him poor marks. These numbers have held relatively steady for the past several months.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/RasmussenReports-Obama-Libya-Gadhafi/2011/03/24/id/390616

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63738
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Attacking Libya - good for Obama's poll numbers?
« Reply #18 on: March 24, 2011, 10:34:17 AM »
Americans See Obama as Weak Military Leader
Thursday, 24 Mar 2011 11:30 AM

WASHINGTON - Only 17 percent of Americans see President Barack Obama as a strong and decisive military leader, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll taken after the United States and its allies began bombing Libya.

Poll: Obama seen as a cautious leader.

Nearly half of those polled view Obama as a cautious and consultative commander-in-chief and more than a third see him as indecisive in military matters.

The poll also found that 60 percent of Americans support the United States and its allies bombing Libya to impose a no-fly zone to protect civilians from forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi.

Seventy-nine percent of those surveyed said the United States and its allies should try to remove Libyan leader Gaddafi, who has ruled the oil-exporting North African country for more than four decades.

This finding was similar to a CNN poll released Tuesday, which found 77 percent of those questioned said it was very important or somewhat important to oust Gaddafi from power.

In the Reuters/Ipsos survey, which was conducted on March 22 from a nationally representative sample of 975 adults, only 7 percent supported deploying ground troops.

Of the 60 percent in favor of the Libya military action, 20 percent strongly supported it and 40 percent somewhat supported it. Twenty-five percent somewhat opposed it and 14 percent were strongly against.

The survey suggested Americans may see Obama, a Democrat, in a very different light from his predecessor, George W. Bush, a Republican who launched the Afghanistan and Iraq wars with some allies but was widely seen as a go-it-alone leader.

Of those polled, 48 percent described Obama's leadership as commander in chief as "cautious and consultative," 36 percent as "indecisive and dithering," and 17 percent as "strong and decisive" in a question that offered only those three choices.

"The data suggest he is perceived to be more consultative in his approach, which may distinguish him in the minds of the American public from his predecessor, George W. Bush, who was not perceived to be," said Ipsos Public Affairs Director Julia Clark, adding that the responses broke along political lines.

"NO TOLERANCE" FOR GROUND TROOPS

In a sign of political division, the top Republican in Congress, House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner, on Wednesday sharpened his criticism of Obama, saying he was "troubled that U.S. military resources were committed to war without clearly defining ... what the mission in Libya is and what America's role is in achieving that mission."

Obama secured U.N. Security Council sanction as well as Arab support before beginning the military operation, whose objective is to protect civilians rather than to oust Gaddafi, the latest authoritarian Arab leader to face mass protests.

Demonstrators toppled Tunisian strongman Zine al-Abedine Ben Ali in January and vast street protests in Cairo -- ultimately backed by the army -- unseated Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in February after three decades in power.

Clark said she was surprised by the strong majority -- 79 percent -- favoring removing Gaddafi from power, particularly at a time when the United States is gradually winding down the war in Iraq and still heavily deployed in Afghanistan.

"That's pretty overwhelming," she said, but noted support for the use of U.S. ground troops in Libya is minimal.

Asked what should be done if the current air strikes fail to restrain Gaddafi, only 7 percent favored sending in U.S. and allied ground troops, 20 percent deploying special forces troops, 25 percent using U.N. peacekeepers and 23 percent advocating increased air strikes. Those surveyed were allowed to select more than one option in response to this question.

Fifteen percent favored none of these options and 29 percent said they did not know what action should be taken.

"Everybody thinks Gaddafi needs to go but there is absolutely no tolerance for the idea of sending in ground troops," Clark said, citing U.S. fatigue with the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. "The idea of entering a third conflict like that garners very, very little support."

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/reuters-poll-americans-barackobama/2011/03/24/id/390613