Not quite sure what to make of your strike one except that its cute you have typecasted your personality and political leanings into a neat and subjective label "self proclaimed skeptic". What exactly are you skeptical of? I would imagine not very much. -- Infield fly rule is ineffect and you pop out to the catcher. 1 Out
Again, not sure why you sperimposed yourself into a crticism of other people on this website and in the news media. So either you overshot your mark by generalizing my original critique of those who dismiss birthers as radicals ( Yo think CT'ers are not radical BTW?) or you didn't understand my original intent for addressing this issue-- Oz beats the ball weakly into the ground and is tagged out by the pitcher. 2 Out
Ok, here is where you really swing and miss ( lets stay in baseball mode). What did I say in this thread that was remotely racist? Accusing someone of being racist in the middle of discussing a topic that has nothing to do with race is a play that libs use when they have no argument and nothing intelligent to say. You claim to be intelligent and act like you have plenty to say, so please show me where I went on a racist rant in this thread. After you fail to do so ask yourself, is admitting that your wrong worth making up stories that don't exist?
No, I am just surrounded by morons and mindless children- pseudo intellectuals and "self proclaimed skepticks" that aren't skeptical of anything. I don't hate any of these individuals. Most are a sorce of amusement and occasionally are fun to debate with. I don't need a threapist to stop hurting your feelings.
Sorry I misunderstood. You said:
No, you would be a self proclaimed deep thinker.
I am not and I don't recall ever saying anything like that. Maybe i did. But i don't think so. But i did proclaim on another threads, and i was specifically talking about CT's, that i was a skeptic. Also i have proclaimed myself the middle mod, neither right or left. So thinking i was referring to my political leanings when i said skeptic is very incorrect. So you see where i came up with the strike? Really, if you think about it, its like 2 strikes, but i am being conservative.
So, sorry again. Maybe i read it wrong.
You could be right, I may have assumed that you were talking about me when you weren't until i read this:
Hmmm--- maybe I do think you are a braindead leftist shill.
So you didn't when you did call me one?
Isn't that kind of what you were talking about when you use the word "those"? Or is that different one of your typecast groups?
Additionally, I am not sure you are aware, even casual and traditional people believe in CT's and follow them not just radicals.
On to the races.....
You haven't said anything racist on this thread. You know that. You also know i wasn't talking about that when i first said it:
Because heaven forbid, you say anything about anything on the left that isn't some sort of attack including your pathetic racist rants.
(What i was telling you was, in a round about way, is that you are no different than a extreme lib, hate blurring your vision.)
But you have posted many times using the words or phrase "pavement ape". And frankly that's pretty despicable that you would use racism in your posts becuase.............. how did you put it?
Projecting racism into a race neutral discussion is always a favorite tactic by mindless libs who cannot construct a coherent argument.
Is that why you put racist slurs in your threads? Or am i mistaken? If i am I apologize. Where you trying to be funny when put racist slurs in your threads? Are you trying to make some sort of statement? Just wondering.
No George, i don't think you are surrounded by morons and mindless children- pseudo intellectuals and "self proclaimed skepticks" that aren't skeptical of anything. You just think you are.
