Author Topic: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"  (Read 803 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« on: April 07, 2011, 01:06:12 PM »
General: U.S. may consider troops in Libya ("operation largely stalemated ")
CBS ^ | 7 April 2011


________________________ _______________________-



Army Gen. Carter Ham says ground forces wouldn't be ideal, but may be a possible way to aid rebels; Says current operation largely stalemated

(CBS/AP) WASHINGTON - The United States may consider sending troops into Libya with a possible international ground force that could aid the rebels, according to the general who led the military mission until NATO took over.

Army Gen. Carter Ham also told lawmakers Thursday that added American participation would not be ideal, and ground troops could erode the international coalition and make it more difficult to get Arab support for operations in Libya.

Ham said the operation was largely stalemated now and was more likely to remain that way since America has transferred control to NATO.


(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...



________________________ ________________________ ____________



IMPEACHMENT!   

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2011, 01:07:03 PM »
What happened to the no fly zone, not boots on the ground.................. ..?
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2011, 01:09:29 PM »
 >:(

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2011, 01:11:35 PM »
BEZERK FURY AND I TOLD YOU GUYS THIS WEEKS AGO!   


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/04/07/501364/main20051760.shtml?tag=stack



Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2011, 01:12:26 PM »
Have we gotten to know the rebels yet?   ::)

Jadeveon Clowney

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5936
  • The life is like a case of chocolate bonbon.
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #5 on: April 07, 2011, 01:13:12 PM »
Someone should invade us and implement democracy here.  government just does whatever it wants to.

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #6 on: April 07, 2011, 01:14:15 PM »
Wait a second I thought we handed this over to NATO ::)

The rebels are a fucking joke and would have been wiped the fuck out by now if not for NATO. So what now we are just going to extend this thing out? Another brilliant calculation by the POTUS.


Someone has decided Gadhafi has to go, apparently at any cost
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #7 on: April 07, 2011, 01:16:23 PM »
Where is team kneepad now?   

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #8 on: April 07, 2011, 01:18:21 PM »
What happened to the no fly zone, not boots on the ground.................. ..?
actually they alread had boots on the ground before they said any of that lol...

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #9 on: April 07, 2011, 01:19:08 PM »
Where is team kneepad now?   
stop fucking asking stupid questions over and over....

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2011, 01:23:56 PM »
stop fucking asking stupid questions over and over....

Why is it stupid? 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #11 on: April 07, 2011, 01:37:39 PM »
Bump for 240.   

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #12 on: April 07, 2011, 02:21:11 PM »
If the 82nd goes...I'll go to. They're all home chilling.  ::)
L

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #13 on: April 07, 2011, 02:39:28 PM »
If the 82nd goes...I'll go to. They're all home chilling.  ::)


This is another Obama cluster fuck.   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #14 on: April 07, 2011, 03:22:20 PM »
Bump.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #15 on: April 07, 2011, 03:51:43 PM »
Don't worry, it's not a war guys. "Kinetic military action" also includes boots on the ground.

What a sick, pathetic joke this is.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #16 on: April 07, 2011, 04:13:13 PM »
i was against NFZ, and i'm sure as shit against troops on the ground.

Senate Res 84 gave them permission (100 to 0)for US/NFZ... I dont think there was anything about troops there

Freeborn126

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 694
Re: General: "U.S. may consider troops in Libya"
« Reply #17 on: April 07, 2011, 05:46:04 PM »
Well if Obama's gonna send troops into Libya too then he better start a draft.  You can't fight 3 wars with an all volunteer force that has been over-taxed for the past 10 years already. 
Live free or die