i dont understand whast so hard to see,,
yates = better hardness ,,drier,,from the back...why? less insulina less gh as simple as that
ron = better everythign else,,better freakiness,,better muscle shape,,better overall back ofcourse,,better detail ,,better arms by a mile,,better genetic respond and better genetic to begin with,,
yates win the back double bi in pictures simply because he was HARDER AND DRIER BECAUSE OF LESS HGH AND LESS INSULINA,,HE USED A LOT OF THEM BUT NOT AT THE LEVEL OF RON
very simple concept
if you take ron insulina and gh down to yates levels you will see that ron loses some size....and ron become just as hard and grainy...but! he would lose some muscle size
in reailty ron would wipe the floor in his best with yates in any pose
in pictures ,,CONDITION TALKS,,the drier you are,,the crispier you are ,,the harder you are IN PICTURES ,, will give the illlusion you are better more polished bodybuild especialy if the 2 arre close in over all size....pictures are deciving ,,in reality on stage ron would wipe dorian into second place in every mr o competition almost aside form the end of his career
never the less both top 5 bodybuilders of all time,,dorian took white ella with very avergage genetic and brought him to the top ,,unlike jason which is a joke dorian actually brought average genetic into superiority
gh15 approved
