Author Topic: natural?  (Read 24813 times)

MONSTER_TRICEPS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4255
Re: natural?
« Reply #50 on: April 26, 2011, 12:40:07 PM »
This was the best that I could do as a lifetime natural
5'11" 154 and 6%

Epic imaginary muscle syndrome.

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: natural?
« Reply #51 on: April 26, 2011, 12:42:44 PM »
how tall are you?

show more pictures,,

its very hard to tell how much real muscle you have because there is water on the physiqe that when diet to stage ,,aka when you go 6 % you will start losing major weight if truly natural ,,

need more pictures to see,,pictures as i told you fellas before are ILLUSIONS IN TIME

you can take 155lb fella and make him look lthe best fitness model you have seen zoomed in or against white wall,,take a look at dj...fella in that pic he put look absolitly great and he is tiny as it can be and no freaky shpe,,think about fellas with freaky shapes in picture like dj pic..they will look much much bigger

need more pictures

gh15 approved
fallen angel

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: natural?
« Reply #52 on: April 26, 2011, 12:44:43 PM »
I see you haven't answered GH15.  Here is my only pic ive posted showing midsection:

naturaly and 17 year old only training a year and a half,, pwning your delts and arms mister "been training 20 years"  ;D   ;D   ;D  


coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #53 on: April 26, 2011, 12:45:36 PM »
I only have that picture and another arm pic from when I was dieted down.  This summer I plan out going down to about 180, so I will take them then.

Youre right about that last couple percentages of bf though.  Natty's will lose a lot of muscle getting super lean.

coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #54 on: April 26, 2011, 12:46:32 PM »
naturaly and 17 year old only training a year and a half,, pwning your delts and arms mister "been training 20 years"  ;D   ;D   ;D 



Sure ya are retard.

coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #55 on: April 26, 2011, 12:52:12 PM »
Best lifts:  (should undoubtedly prove natural status)

best bench:  330
best squat:  370
best dumbbell flat press:  120's for 8
best db military press:  120's for 2
best leg press:  9 plates aside for 20 reps.  (this is perhaps my best lift).

If I were on something, i'd be able to bench over 330.  Period.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: natural?
« Reply #56 on: April 26, 2011, 12:59:30 PM »

Sure ya are retard.
leaner, thats for sure. but i had more size at 17 than you do after 20 years of training.  :)

coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #57 on: April 26, 2011, 01:03:48 PM »
You think you're leaner than me in my pic?  Dude, you're crazy.  You have no muscle to even show that you're lean.

Yes, moron, you have more size at 17 than I do at 33.  The pics show this.   ::)


I like you tbombz and you remind me of myself at your age, but don't be such a know-it-all.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: natural?
« Reply #58 on: April 26, 2011, 01:05:32 PM »
You think you're leaner than me in my pic?  Dude, you're crazy.  You have no muscle to even show that you're lean.

And how can you make a statement that you were bigger at 17 when I was when I haven't posted a pic of me at 17 to begin with?  This just shows your youth and stupidity.

I like you tbombz and you remind me of myself at your age, but don't be such a know-it-all.
boy u sure r a dummy for a lawyer  ;D


no, ur arm is leaner

but i was bigger at 17 than you are now.

get it? if not, check the pics, itll tell u the same story

coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #59 on: April 26, 2011, 01:05:48 PM »
Seriously dude, if youre being sarcastic, stop.  I'm wasting time arguing.

The simple reality is that even juiced your build doesn't compare to mine natty.  I have more years of building than you by far and have muscle maturity which you don't yet.

coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #60 on: April 26, 2011, 01:09:52 PM »
boy u sure r a dummy for a lawyer  ;D


no, ur arm is leaner

but i was bigger at 17 than you are now.

get it? if not, check the pics, itll tell u the same story

You mean fatter? 

Bro, I don't wanna be mean, but your living in a dream land. 

coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #61 on: April 26, 2011, 01:10:55 PM »
Post your 17 year old juiced pics tbombz.   ::)

Let's see that permabulked "size" you got.   ::)

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: natural?
« Reply #62 on: April 26, 2011, 01:17:13 PM »
Here's a pic of me at about 21.  Permabulked to the hilt.  My "size" here outdoes yours tbombz.  And natty too.
Are you related to BlackFagStud ? I see the common 'white' marks of teh 2012 Mr. Gitbeg.
L

coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #63 on: April 26, 2011, 01:18:00 PM »
Are you related to BlackFagStud ? I see the common 'white' marks of teh 2012 Mr. Gitbeg.

negative.  Just the color i picked on paintbrush.

radioflyer46

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: natural?
« Reply #64 on: April 26, 2011, 01:23:04 PM »
I see you haven't answered GH15.  Here is my only pic ive posted showing midsection:
     Wow Coletran, nice midsection and tres trail.   

coltrane

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3773
Re: natural?
« Reply #65 on: April 26, 2011, 01:26:46 PM »
     Wow Coletran, nice midsection and tres trail.   

Thank you.

radioflyer46

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: natural?
« Reply #66 on: April 26, 2011, 01:37:47 PM »
  You bet.

CalvinH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22222
  • Spastic Tarted Cvunt
Re: natural?
« Reply #67 on: April 26, 2011, 01:39:29 PM »
This was the best that I could do as a lifetime natural
5'11" 154 and 6%



Someone posted that every fucking post you make is about yourself.


....they were right.

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: natural?
« Reply #68 on: April 26, 2011, 01:55:24 PM »
natural means less than a gram of test per week

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23810
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: natural?
« Reply #69 on: April 26, 2011, 02:07:03 PM »
Great arms and good chest and shoulders on Coltrane.
I think he looks better than you Bombz - natuaal or nor.
.

Per Se

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 852
Re: natural?
« Reply #70 on: April 26, 2011, 02:08:12 PM »
This was the best that I could do as a lifetime natural
5'11" 154 and 6%

This is why gh15 is bad for getbig....ur seriously gona post a pic of a guy almost 6 foot who weighs the same as a JUNIOR MIDDLEWEIGHT BOXER and say this is "the best u can find of a lifetime natural!!!"

crazy

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: natural?
« Reply #71 on: April 26, 2011, 02:19:21 PM »
You mean fatter? 

Bro, I don't wanna be mean, but your living in a dream land. 
visible line between delts, tris, and bis? visible lines between hammies and quads? fatt?   yes, fatter than yu are... f i was leanerr i would be pwning u hardcore.. now its comparable .. but still... me being comparable to u in terms f mass as a natty 17 y.o. taking into consideration u been training for 20 years means that i do have quite a bit of superiority over you. fact.


















 ;D
you look great, ive never had a midsection like that..   as for my size now, u cant tell much in pics but im a realy big dude... just the other some gym rat who is competing next month and usg some test was talkin to he whole gym about how big i was trying to lick my ball sack and shit... well i cant blame him first time i went in there without long loose sleeves and im 5'111' 240 13%bf.. truly tho..  in person u would be patting me on the shoulder caling me buddy acting lie u dididnt just want to feel my delts tof ulfill ur clsteted bi cruious facination with muscloes.. 

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: natural?
« Reply #72 on: April 26, 2011, 02:33:53 PM »
This was the best that I could do as a lifetime natural
5'11" 154 and 6%


You look like a skinny little shit and you aren't 6% you delusional asshead....you are lean with very little muscle...You have that stringy, "I suck at bodybuilding" thing going on.

I mean seriously. ...your arms are puny and you have zero thickness on your torso. You keep touting Zane, as if you are a "lines" Guy...but your aesthetics are average at best...boxy waist with odd looking abs

local hero

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8714
  • mma finance warrior of peace
Re: natural?
« Reply #73 on: April 26, 2011, 04:19:05 PM »
how does a pic i took of me taken on holdiay get brought into this,,, of course my waist is blocky, i was 240, drinking beers and eating shite at the buffet everyday...


225, 6'1...

local hero

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8714
  • mma finance warrior of peace
Re: natural?
« Reply #74 on: April 26, 2011, 04:23:40 PM »
im not pertaining to being the next dorian yates, but at least ive competed at national level a few times