You need to clarify which Ron Paul you're talking about.
The one who supports term limits or the one who has been in office since dinosaurs roamed?
The one who is against earmarks and votes against them or the one who puts them in bills?
The one against the war or the one for the war?
The one hell bent on personal liberty and freedom or the one against abortion?
The fact that you even suggested that he might be ""cool with Muslims and other terrorists killing Americans as they see fit" is ridiculous and so you got a response that was very fitting. Why dont you watch some of his debates to find your answer?
What makes you think he would do nothing? Do you think we should go to all out war over one American dying or 1000 or 10000? where do you draw the line?
Well he seems to think it was a colossal waste of time going after OBL. So, if 3,000 dead Americans aren't enough to justify going to war then how many dead Americans is? A million?
I can see it now. Video after video of American ex-pats having their heads sawed off while the great non-interventionist Ron Paul sits there on his throne rambling on about staying out of things because, you know, a few American lives ain't nuttin but a G than, homey.
I disagree with almost all of Ron Paul's foreign policy and some of his economic policy
Ron Paul advocates that we abolish all international treaties because he's afraid that it'll lead to gun sales, missile tradeoffs, etc. I agree with him that history shows the U.S. should not give guns to other nations. But he still doesn't think countries should cooperate for human rights issues or environmental issues and I disagree with this.
Oh and he wants to abolish the UN completely because it takes away the right of congress to declare war. However he never addresses the human rights aspect of the UN.
Good post until your last sentence. The UN has no human rights aspect. It is the most corrupt, incompetent and pathetic organization on the planet. It is run by dictators, despots and tyrants. The OIC has a near-stranglehold on all affairs and its "Human Rights Council" is chock full of some of the most egregious violators of human rights on the planet.
Fuck, Libya was a member until a month ago and Syria is in line to actually gain membership in the next vote...all while Assad rolls tanks through his towns killing people at will. Meanwhile, the UN can't even come to agreement on a sternly-worded LETTER of condemnation.
Ron Paul's desire to leave the UN is one of his best viewpoints.
