Author Topic: Ronnie had no tris?  (Read 3305 times)

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Ronnie had no tris?
« on: May 13, 2011, 03:48:32 PM »
i recently saw a post where some one said cleman had similiar tris to rhul.....




his tris  just wasnt seperated


ronnie in his prime had some of the biggest tris
they just wern't seperated.. as say flex
choice is an illusion

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15232
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2011, 04:41:05 PM »
yeah, monster triceps ::)


#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2011, 04:49:34 PM »
Dorian's were better. Everything on Dorian was better actually.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2011, 06:11:04 PM »
yeah, monster triceps ::)


coleman could never to a roper side tri and thats his torn left tri...

choice is an illusion

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2011, 09:09:30 PM »
Ronnie's triceps were at their best from 98-2001, but like the other poster said, he just couldn't hit the pose correct.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2011, 09:34:38 PM »
He had MASSIVE tris and detailed...

Later in his carreer he had some injuries and they lost size and got flat.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2011, 01:51:48 AM »
Left tri still massive
I just laugh when I see people say Ronnie has no tris etc
Watch any of his videos his tris are literally hanging of the back of his arms... Down the elbow like they're about to fall off
choice is an illusion

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2011, 02:56:55 AM »
he had monstrous triceps, he also had monstrous calves only no definition what makes people think he had no calves.

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14065
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2011, 03:01:53 AM »
Ronnie's triceps were at their best from 98-2001, but like the other poster said, he just couldn't hit the pose correct.


You're absolutely right.  If you look closely, the man actually looks perplexed at the mere attempt of hitting that pose.

"1"

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2011, 03:15:18 AM »
You're absolutely right.  If you look closely, the man actually looks perplexed at the mere attempt of hitting that pose.

"1"
just another facet to very complex being that is Ronnie Coleman.

local hero

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8714
  • mma finance warrior of peace
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2011, 05:39:41 AM »
he looked uncomfortable most the time on stage, like a geeky white man in a black body

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26363
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2011, 05:48:28 AM »
Here's some pretty decent tris

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2011, 06:29:32 AM »
Its amazing that somebody with tris that look so fuggin huge on his arm, especially in the FDB and RDB, but he has one of the WORST side tri poses in BB.
I dont understand.
Compare to Dorian, the complete opposite, arms are completely average for a pro, but his side tri is one of the best in BB history.
Always thought that was weird.

It has to have something to do with the outer head of his tri being underdeveloped or something.  Seems like the outer head is extremely long and thin looking, and it destroys his side tri.

OptimusPrime1980

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2292
  • FODA SE! ;)
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #13 on: May 14, 2011, 06:46:12 AM »
ronnie had short muscles in his arms...
they were huge but short, it gave him a very good bicepspeak with a slice in the middle.
but it made his triceps looking less in some poses.
dorian's side triceps looked sick because of conditioning... guy was a fu@$ing mummy!

ronnie was a better bodybuilder masswise, had it all!
but conditioning , nobody touches dorian, maybe dex , and ofcourse munzer....


Be Happy,
Optimus

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2011, 07:55:24 AM »
Now These are tri's....the rest are only try's..

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #15 on: May 14, 2011, 07:57:20 AM »
Now These are tri's....the rest are only try's..
Sad, that is the only pic, where his tris looked good...

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #16 on: May 14, 2011, 08:00:45 AM »
Sad, that is the on;y pic, where his tris looked good...
???

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #17 on: May 14, 2011, 08:02:21 AM »
Now These are tri's....the rest are only try's..


amazing tris
mentzer
im starting to thing the inner heard is the key to the hanging full look
choice is an illusion

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #18 on: May 14, 2011, 08:10:12 AM »
???
There is another pic of him doing the same shot---his tris are not as seperated and his chest is "pftttt", And when he competed (pros), his tris--arms in general were  "subpar" compared to his legs (yeah, I wish i was that "subpar")...too bad his issues were bigger than his tris AND his quads...


Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #19 on: May 14, 2011, 10:18:56 AM »
Sad, that is the only pic, where his tris looked good...

Looks good here

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #20 on: May 14, 2011, 10:19:55 AM »
Looks good here
some of the best tris ever
choice is an illusion

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2011, 11:23:28 AM »
What happened to this clown btw ?

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #22 on: May 14, 2011, 11:25:07 AM »
not a fan of ernies tris
choice is an illusion

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #23 on: May 14, 2011, 11:30:18 AM »
Looks good here
Never was good as that other shot---look at the seperation of the his tris and delts, and the striations, and look at his chest and abs---something happened, he never looked better, he was smoother in all the other pics 

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Ronnie had no tris?
« Reply #24 on: May 14, 2011, 11:31:42 AM »
What happened to this clown btw ?

He had to retire from bodybuilding after oil prices shot up a few years ago